No, the original black-and-white 1968 version.Lazario wrote:The color version? I mean, the 1990 color movie?PeterPanfan wrote:Night of the Living Dead - A little overrated. The acting was horrible, but the cinematography was very good.

I'm pretty daft most of the time- this is the first rave I've heard of this film's cinematography.PeterPanfan wrote:No, the original black-and-white 1968 version.Lazario wrote: The color version? I mean, the 1990 color movie?
 
  I mean, with a film like this, the last thing I'll ever complain about is the acting. Really bad acting can kill a movie, but that's a rare occurence. My personal philosophy with acting (is just like special effects): if the story is smart and the director is ambitious and knows exactly what they're doing... the acting doesn't matter. The film's implications about race are enough by themselves to make acting quality a non-issue. And then of course... all actors back then were incredibly stiff and reserved. Until the moment when action called for them to do something. I usually ignore what would pass for social commentary in this movie and focus on the action. Which kind of amounts to schlock in these current times.
  I mean, with a film like this, the last thing I'll ever complain about is the acting. Really bad acting can kill a movie, but that's a rare occurence. My personal philosophy with acting (is just like special effects): if the story is smart and the director is ambitious and knows exactly what they're doing... the acting doesn't matter. The film's implications about race are enough by themselves to make acting quality a non-issue. And then of course... all actors back then were incredibly stiff and reserved. Until the moment when action called for them to do something. I usually ignore what would pass for social commentary in this movie and focus on the action. Which kind of amounts to schlock in these current times.
And it's also the closest a Disney heroine has come to being a true femme fatale.... Meg is quite close in spirit to an animated Barbara Stanwyck.Margos wrote:Hercules - You know, the gag timing was very similar to TPatF, but the design (especially of the characters) was a lot more sort of "fast and loose." I do love the songs in this, but there is a segment of the score that has always sounded suspiciously like "Hellfire." (I'm referring to the very end of "Go the Distance," btw.) All in all, an excellent movie. Is it the tone that I personally would have liked to see a Greek mythology film done in? No. But it's so funny that I don't care, and the relationship between Meg and Herc is just so perfect. Lovely film.
.

Well, one could make the arguement for Jessica Rabbit.... although that's really more of a facade than her true nature, I guess.Cordy_Biddle wrote: And it's also the closest a Disney heroine has come to being a true femme fatale.... Meg is quite close in spirit to an animated Barbara Stanwyck.
 
  
Jess isn't really a femme fatale...she's just drawn that way!Margos wrote:Well, one could make the arguement for Jessica Rabbit.... although that's really more of a facade than her true nature, I guess.Cordy_Biddle wrote: And it's also the closest a Disney heroine has come to being a true femme fatale.... Meg is quite close in spirit to an animated Barbara Stanwyck.


To my shame, I only managed to catch "Toy Story 2" a couple of years ago--my brother urged me to see it when it came to TV--and I must say I was most pleasantly surprised. Totally agree with your thoughts about it. Didn't think it would live up to the incredible hype of the first movie but it's even better in my opinion.Margos wrote:She can act the part if she wants to, which I think makes her very interesting. She isn't a one-note character, and she is very in control of her every action. But, you're right, she isn't much of a femme fatale, really.
Toy Story 2 - Really, this is one of the few sequels in all of movie-dom that really does surpass the original. Now, it's not perfect by any means, especially in the visuals department. Pixar still had quite a ways to go to get to perfection, for example, Buster doesn't look anywhere near as nice as the dogs in "Up" (depsite being a ten-fold improvement over Scud), and the humans really approach uncanny valley at times (Pixar really didn't master the human form in an appealing way until "The Incredibles). But story and theme wise, this was a huge step for the young studio. "Toy Story" was a heartwarming buddy comedy. "A Bug's Life" was an uplifiting story about how even though an individual is weak, there is a very powerful strength in numbers. But "Toy Story 2" really was an examination of mortality: both literally and in the sense of the death of childhood, not to mention the concept of a short, full life as opposed to empty immortality. And "When She Loved Me" is one of the best songs that Randy Newman has ever written, simply heartbreaking! This movie always makes me a little weepy... I love it!

I thought it looked good too, but truthfully aside from pushing the envelope in effects (which is a given for any new effects movies) it really doesn't add anything new.blackcauldron85 wrote:Was it really? I don't want to see this bad enough to pay the regular price of a ticket, but I'd see it at the second run theater or through Netflix. I thought that it looked really good...Disney-Fan wrote:2012 - Predictable and bland