What's Roy up to?

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Post Reply
thatartguy
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 336
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 9:56 am

What's Roy up to?

Post by thatartguy »

What eventually happened with Roy's crusade, and what's he doing now?

Last I knew he was buying the Harlem Globetrotters.
User avatar
Jules
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4629
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Malta, Europe
Contact:

Post by Jules »

I'm really curious aswell, but I have no idea. It's strange; we haven't heard about anything concerning him since he was fired from the Disney Board of Directors. :?

Any UD members who know a bit more?
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

Oh, he's up to about 76 years or so by now I think.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
Buzz Lightyear
Limited Issue
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Buzz Lightyear »

I think after Eisner quit, Roy came to a truce with the company.
Mushu2083
Special Edition
Posts: 905
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 8:16 pm
Location: Peoria, Arizona

Post by Mushu2083 »

That sounds about right. I'm guessing Roy and Eisner never really liked each other in the first place.
Dragon, not lizard. I don't do that tongue thing.

Lilo: I'm not touching you!
Stitch: TOUCHING ME!
User avatar
AwallaceUNC
Signature Collection
Posts: 9439
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 1:00 am
Contact:

Post by AwallaceUNC »

Well it was Roy who brought Eisner to the company in the first place. Roy is still involved with the WDC, he's just not on the board of directors anymore. He is currently a Director Emeritus and consultant for the company, not to mention a very large shareholder. He's also still president of Shamrock Holdings, though I don't know how much of his time that consumes, as I think it's mainly for controlling his own money and investments. I would like to see him brought back to the Board or the Animation Dept., but I'm happy that he's still at least involved. Just because we aren't hearing much about him doesn't mean he's not around. He's obviously very passionate about the company, so I'm sure he's keeping himself in the mix.

-Aaron
• Author of Hocus Pocus in Focus: The Thinking Fan's Guide to Disney's Halloween Classic
and The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom (Epcot coming soon)
• Host of Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Pod, the longest-running Disney podcast
• Entertainment Writer & Moderator at DVDizzy.com
• Twitter - @aaronspod
User avatar
disneyboy20022
Signature Collection
Posts: 6868
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:17 pm

I wonder if....

Post by disneyboy20022 »

I wonder if his name will be included on the next set of Walt Disney Treasure DVD Tins. Does anyone know if it will or won't.
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Post by Elladorine »

Anyone know if he's still interested in having The Thief and the Cobbler restored?
Image
Maerj
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2748
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 11:31 pm
Location: Ephrata, PA
Contact:

Post by Maerj »

enigmawing wrote:Anyone know if he's still interested in having The Thief and the Cobbler restored?
I've actually just been reading about that film lately. There's a guy who did a restored cut and its online. The animation is pretty amazing even though the film was never properly finished.

You can see it here:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p ... 54FBA[url]
User avatar
totallyminnie86
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:15 pm
Contact:

Post by totallyminnie86 »

Maerj wrote:
enigmawing wrote:Anyone know if he's still interested in having The Thief and the Cobbler restored?
I've actually just been reading about that film lately. There's a guy who did a restored cut and its online. The animation is pretty amazing even though the film was never properly finished.

You can see it here:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p ... 54FBA[url]
I didn't know anything about that film until I read it mentioned on here. At first I was confused because I only knew it as what I thought was an aladdin knock-off called the princess & the cobbler, a non-disney release form the mid 90s right? This is that same movie isn't it? I started trying to look up some info on it...evidently some reincarnation or another of it was in production for a long time.... was disney ever involved? its interesting to find out the history of this.
User avatar
so it goes
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:50 pm

Post by so it goes »

Wow, that movie looks amazing. I only watched the trailer but some time I'll have to sit down and watch it all. Thank you for posting that link.
User avatar
Kram Nebuer
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1992
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 2:03 pm
Location: Happiest Place on Earth :)
Contact:

Post by Kram Nebuer »

totallyminnie86 wrote:I didn't know anything about that film until I read it mentioned on here. At first I was confused because I only knew it as what I thought was an aladdin knock-off called the princess & the cobbler, a non-disney release form the mid 90s right? This is that same movie isn't it? I started trying to look up some info on it...evidently some reincarnation or another of it was in production for a long time.... was disney ever involved? its interesting to find out the history of this.
That's exactly what I thought when I was little. This is the movie with the guy named Tack (or Tac or Tak or Taq...I dunno how he spells it) and the cover of the video had some blue character that looked like a combination of Genie and Jafar.
Image
<a href=http://kramnebuer.dvdaf.com/>My ºoº DVDs </a>
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14050
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

The Thief and the Cobbler

Post by Disney Duster »

Oh wow my dad actually took me to this movie when I was a kid! But that's about all I remember...it's obviously a visual masterpiece, but I guess the story was not as well-told and memorable as Disney's films. Still, I might like to own a restored version of this work of art. But what would Roy Disney have to do with it? Does he really want to restore a film he wasn't involved with? If he's just doing it because he appreciates the art, and wants to give the film the respect it deserves, then that's really impressive and commendable.

And apparently, totallyminnie86, this film inspired Aladdin, and thus it was not a knock-off of it. However, I read that Disney bought it and edited it in an attempt to make it more mainstream, and released that as Arabian Nights. But I though the title in theaters when I saw it was The Thief and the Cobbler...so I don't know.
Last edited by Disney Duster on Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
User avatar
JiminyCrick91
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3930
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: ont. canada
Contact:

Post by JiminyCrick91 »

Disney Duster wrote: But what would Roy Disney have to do with it? Why would he want to restore something he(or Disney) wasn't involved with?
Miramax is owned (now) by Disney.
Image
User avatar
Jules
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4629
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Malta, Europe
Contact:

Post by Jules »

I want to ask whether there's been any development regarding Richard Williams' The Thief and the Cobbler restoration (the fan edit doesn't count). I don't know if Roy Disney is still interested, but I think I read somewhere (Wikipedia?) that a few years ago Don Hahn mentioned that all the art from the film was sitting at the Disney Animation Research library.

I think the only way we might ever see this film completed is if all the current surviving material is restored and remastered, and the remaining incomplete 15 minutes of screen time be animated at Walt Disney Animation Studios and integrated with the older material.

Unfortunately Richard Williams will likely not want to have anything to do with any restoration process. He's disassociated himself from the film.

I've only seen YouTube clips of the film, and the animation looks glorious beyond anything I've ever seen done at Disney. And the art direction? It gives me chills ...
User avatar
milojthatch
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2646
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:34 am

Post by milojthatch »

Yes, Iger reached out to him and made peace.
____________________________________________________________
All the adversity I've had in my life, all my troubles and obstacles, have strengthened me... You may not realize it when it happens, but a kick in the teeth may be the best thing in the world for you.

-Walt Disney
User avatar
jpanimation
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1841
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:00 am

Post by jpanimation »

The Thief and the Cobbler is a bad movie. I have all the respect in the world for Richard Williams and his work on Roger Rabbit but The Thief and the Cobbler is BAD. The characters are one dimensional and uninteresting and the story just sucks, not to mention the whole thing just drags. The problem is Williams thought of a bunch of fantastic sequences and animated them beautifully but never really had a story to piece them together. Miramax tried to save what they could with some bad new voice overs, crappy songs, and cutting up the jumbled mess even more. The original bad movie became worse.

I only recommend you watch the movie if you want to see some great animation. If you want a good movie then you might want to skip this one.
User avatar
Jules
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4629
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Malta, Europe
Contact:

Post by Jules »

jpanimation wrote:The Thief and the Cobbler is a bad movie. I have all the respect in the world for Richard Williams and his work on Roger Rabbit but The Thief and the Cobbler is BAD. The characters are one dimensional and uninteresting and the story just sucks, not to mention the whole thing just drags. The problem is Williams thought of a bunch of fantastic sequences and animated them beautifully but never really had a story to piece them together. Miramax tried to save what they could with some bad new voice overs, crappy songs, and cutting up the jumbled mess even more. The original bad movie became worse.

I only recommend you watch the movie if you want to see some great animation. If you want a good movie then you might want to skip this one.
I just watched the Recobbled Cut and I must agree on the quality of the story. I was underwhelmed. Various gobsmackingly brilliant sequences of animation seemed to exist solely to show off the animation (e.g. the climax with the thief and the machine).

In the end, though not as artistically ambitious, I think Disney's Aladdin is the better movie.
Post Reply