Snow White Blu Ray Thread Without Blu Ray Versus DVD Posts!!

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Dottie
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2576
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: The Pie-Hole
Contact:

Post by Dottie »

I think the Blu-Ray is fantastic and has plenty of bonus features to make everybody happy.
I don't own the previous PE and would have liked to see some of the stuff that was left off the Diamond Edition, but that's nitpicking IMHO.
The whole Hyperion studio tour is awesome and although I would have preferred a long documentary to the Hyperion studio tour it has an amazing amount of material.
And serously, how many bonus features can you watch?

I guess if people really want to they should hold on to their old PEs, but the Blu-Ray IMHO has enough stuff on it to satisfy at least many of the most ardent Snow White fans.
Image
User avatar
Deco King
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 5:26 am
Location: Ribchester, Preston, Lancashire, England
Contact:

Post by Deco King »

I would have loved to have seen the newly cleaned up Hi Def Cauldron scene have to wait till the 75th or 80th Anniversary now!
To Make Doubly Sure Bring Back Her Heart In This!!
CampbellzSoup

Post by CampbellzSoup »

why would they waste their time cleaning up an old cut scene that wasn't good enough for the movie under Walts direction?

Are you honestly telling me the whole entire Diamond Edition isn't good enough because of one deleted scene thats not in the extras? That's crazy my dear sir.
User avatar
DisneyFreak5282
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: U.S.A.

Post by DisneyFreak5282 »

I'm just having trouble understanding why this couldn't have been discussed in the already existing Snow White Diamond Edition thread. Most people have already posted their opinions in there anyway. :roll:
UDer #3495 :D
User avatar
SpringHeelJack
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by SpringHeelJack »

CampbellzSoup wrote:why would they waste their time cleaning up an old cut scene that wasn't good enough for the movie under Walts direction
Well, that's not really fair. By that logic, it's like why include any deleted scene of anything ever? And I know you wouldn't care, Soupz, but many of us like our deleted scenes.
"Ta ta ta taaaa! Look at me... I'm a snowman! I'm gonna go stand on someone's lawn if I don't get something to do around here pretty soon!"
CampbellzSoup

Post by CampbellzSoup »

SpringHeelJack wrote:
CampbellzSoup wrote:why would they waste their time cleaning up an old cut scene that wasn't good enough for the movie under Walts direction
Well, that's not really fair. By that logic, it's like why include any deleted scene of anything ever? And I know you wouldn't care, Soupz, but many of us like our deleted scenes.
no I'm saying why would they waste their time digitally restoring it B. I like deleted scenes too, but to make a fuss over one missing is :\
Just.A.Friend

Post by Just.A.Friend »

CampbellzSoup wrote: no I'm saying why would they waste their time digitally restoring it B. I like deleted scenes too, but to make a fuss over one missing is :\
I think more of the problem (it isn't exactly a problem at all, to me actually) is the deleted scene was already available and ready from the previous Snow White release. They wanted to make this release the most exclusive and ultimate release yet, starting of this Diamond Collection and what not. Seems like a good idea to just throw in another deleted scene, even only at 30 seconds. Its something easy that adds an extra thing to the release to make it that more "exclusive." They didn't even have to do the digital restoration or whatever..

In any case, I'm very happy with the Blu-Ray release of the film. It looks absolutely fantastic in high definition, but the sound still isn't absolutely terrific to me, but considering the age of the film its very good.
I don't see how many could be disappointed with this release.
User avatar
The_Iceflash
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:56 am
Location: USA

Post by The_Iceflash »

yukitora wrote:Import the aussie release! it is the same region as UK (B).

my thoughts: compared to the DVD the difference in video quality isn't amazing but it's there. The menus are cool but somewhat difficult compared to SB/Pinocchio. Hyperion Studios is cool but again a little difficult to use unless you just watch it off the index.

I'd honestly prefer a more traditional 'backstage disney' approach but they purposely decided to take advantage of blu-ray (which is why none of this appears on the DVD).
I'm surprised no one had anything to say about the bold part.
CampbellzSoup

Post by CampbellzSoup »

User avatar
SpringHeelJack
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by SpringHeelJack »

The_Iceflash wrote:
yukitora wrote:Import the aussie release! it is the same region as UK (B).

my thoughts: compared to the DVD the difference in video quality isn't amazing but it's there. The menus are cool but somewhat difficult compared to SB/Pinocchio. Hyperion Studios is cool but again a little difficult to use unless you just watch it off the index.

I'd honestly prefer a more traditional 'backstage disney' approach but they purposely decided to take advantage of blu-ray (which is why none of this appears on the DVD).
I'm surprised no one had anything to say about the bold part.
Sweet wounded Jesus. What needs to be said? It's seventy freaking years old. You aren't going to notice a staggering difference as you would with, say, the live-action "Transformers". It says it all right there. It's better, but it's not shocking. What are you trying to prove? You're not helping your cause.
"Ta ta ta taaaa! Look at me... I'm a snowman! I'm gonna go stand on someone's lawn if I don't get something to do around here pretty soon!"
User avatar
The_Iceflash
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:56 am
Location: USA

Post by The_Iceflash »

SpringHeelJack wrote:
The_Iceflash wrote: I'm surprised no one had anything to say about the bold part.
Sweet wounded Jesus. What needs to be said? It's seventy freaking years old. You aren't going to notice a staggering difference as you would with, say, the live-action "Transformers". It says it all right there. It's better, but it's not shocking. What are you trying to prove? You're not helping your cause.
What cause? Who's trying to prove anything? :?:


Nice try though..
User avatar
SpringHeelJack
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by SpringHeelJack »

Aw, shucks, you caught me. It was a worthy effort on my part, though. I guess my country lawyer ways are just no match for your city slicker stylings.
"Ta ta ta taaaa! Look at me... I'm a snowman! I'm gonna go stand on someone's lawn if I don't get something to do around here pretty soon!"
User avatar
JustOneBite87
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:09 pm

Post by JustOneBite87 »

I thought there was a pretty big difference... to the trained eye at least.

Perhaps Sleeping Beauty may have been more evident with detail improvements being noticeable, but on Snow White you can see the cell moving fluidly above the background if you look closely. The DVD is sort of flat in appearance, but still excellent.
User avatar
Jules
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4623
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Malta, Europe
Contact:

Post by Jules »

The_Iceflash, let's get one thing straight ...

Blu-ray is better than DVD.

It is better than DVD.

It is up to you whether to embrace it or not, and I respect the direction you wish to take.

But Blu-ray is better than DVD. It has better picture and sound quality.

That is not a matter of opinion.

A good DVD can produce excellent pictures (and I enjoy a good DVD despite owning a Blu-ray player) but Blu-ray discs undeniably produce a better movie-going experience. Case closed.
yukitora
Special Edition
Posts: 947
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:01 am
Location: at home apparently
Contact:

Post by yukitora »

^I think the iceflash was trying to say that there is a HUGE difference in blu-ray and dvd video quality. Which is true.

I just think for this particular film, which is mighty old mind you, the blu-ray isn't amazingly greater than the dvd.
User avatar
The_Iceflash
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:56 am
Location: USA

Post by The_Iceflash »

Julian Carter wrote:The_Iceflash, let's get one thing straight ...

Blu-ray is better than DVD.

It is better than DVD.

It is up to you whether to embrace it or not, and I respect the direction you wish to take.

But Blu-ray is better than DVD. It has better picture and sound quality.

That is not a matter of opinion.

A good DVD can produce excellent pictures (and I enjoy a good DVD despite owning a Blu-ray player) but Blu-ray discs undeniably produce a better movie-going experience. Case closed.
I wish you all would stop getting defensive and saying I said or believe things I never said. It makes you all look bad. First of all, I never ever said that a BD wasn't better than a DVD. Ever. Just because I don't want any parts of it doesn't mean I don't think it's better. Second of all, whether it produces a better moving-going experience is opinion. It's personal preference over what makes a better movie-going experience.

^I think the iceflash was trying to say that there is a HUGE difference in blu-ray and dvd video quality. Which is true.
I didn't say of imply there was a HUGE difference either. :)

All I said was I'm surprised that no one had anything to say about that since I know there are people here who are so overly defensive about any criticism over BD's quality that they'd try to challenge that. I know if I were the one to say that I would be asked what TV I have, etc for them to find something wrong there to try to discredit that.

I just thought what was said was interesting and wanted to point that out since everyone here who has it find it sacrilegious to be critical of BD in that way.
yukitora
Special Edition
Posts: 947
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:01 am
Location: at home apparently
Contact:

Post by yukitora »

I put the emphasis on the wrong word :lol: but your comment is still valid.
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Post by Elladorine »

:brick:
Image
CampbellzSoup

Post by CampbellzSoup »

The_Iceflash wrote:
Julian Carter wrote:The_Iceflash, let's get one thing straight ...

Blu-ray is better than DVD.

It is better than DVD.

It is up to you whether to embrace it or not, and I respect the direction you wish to take.

But Blu-ray is better than DVD. It has better picture and sound quality.

That is not a matter of opinion.

A good DVD can produce excellent pictures (and I enjoy a good DVD despite owning a Blu-ray player) but Blu-ray discs undeniably produce a better movie-going experience. Case closed.
I wish you all would stop getting defensive and saying I said or believe things I never said. It makes you all look bad. First of all, I never ever said that a BD wasn't better than a DVD. Ever. Just because I don't want any parts of it doesn't mean I don't think it's better. Second of all, whether it produces a better moving-going experience is opinion. It's personal preference over what makes a better movie-going experience.

^I think the iceflash was trying to say that there is a HUGE difference in blu-ray and dvd video quality. Which is true.
I didn't say of imply there was a HUGE difference either. :)

All I said was I'm surprised that no one had anything to say about that since I know there are people here who are so overly defensive about any criticism over BD's quality that they'd try to challenge that. I know if I were the one to say that I would be asked what TV I have, etc for them to find something wrong there to try to discredit that.

I just thought what was said was interesting and wanted to point that out since everyone here who has it find it sacrilegious to be critical of BD in that way.
God you are annoying your posts are why the stuff here keeps going on.
User avatar
The_Iceflash
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1809
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:56 am
Location: USA

Post by The_Iceflash »

CampbellzSoup wrote:
The_Iceflash wrote: I wish you all would stop getting defensive and saying I said or believe things I never said. It makes you all look bad. First of all, I never ever said that a BD wasn't better than a DVD. Ever. Just because I don't want any parts of it doesn't mean I don't think it's better. Second of all, whether it produces a better moving-going experience is opinion. It's personal preference over what makes a better movie-going experience.

I didn't say of imply there was a HUGE difference either. :)

All I said was I'm surprised that no one had anything to say about that since I know there are people here who are so overly defensive about any criticism over BD's quality that they'd try to challenge that. I know if I were the one to say that I would be asked what TV I have, etc for them to find something wrong there to try to discredit that.

I just thought what was said was interesting and wanted to point that out since everyone here who has it find it sacrilegious to be critical of BD in that way.
God you are annoying your posts are why the stuff here keeps going on.
It can be people making something out of nothing can it? Nah, It can't possibly be that. It just has to be all me.

Right....:roll:

You saw why I said what I said. If you honestly think the issue is me then apparently the problem is not with me. Everyone needs to stop getting overly defensive. Everyone else irrationally blows up something I said to be something it's not and I'm the reason this stuff keeps going on? Look again.
Post Reply