Marky, do you know how illogical you sound. Do you even read back what you've typed, or is it some strange, random stream on conciousness ramble?
Do you not think in the decades since the motion picture camera was invented, great minds haven't solved the problem of how to film a film sequence in focus? I mean, even since before film was created, lenses were created that could magnify many times, enabling scientists to both look out into the heavens with untold clarity and likewise view microscopic organisms.
Do you really think the best they could do for motion picture cameras was a "unsharp blur"?
And the same is true for film stock. Evidence suggests that contrary to impressions from crappy copied or transferred TV/DVD viewings, original 1930's filmstock did in fact have high-fidelity. Check out this wikipedia page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technicolor
In 1931, an improvement of Technicolor Process 3 was developed which removed grain from the Technicolor film and resulted in a more vivid and vibrant color.[4] This process was first used on a Radio Picture entitled: The Runaround (1931). The new process not only improved the color but also removed specks (that looked like bugs) from the screen, which had previously blurred outlines and lowered visibility.
That's from freaking 1931!
1931! Indeed, it appears the transfer of such films to the so called "safety film" (which was less liable to spontaniously combust) that issues with grain became more apparent - no doubt because the transfer was done from a generational copy rather then the original negatives.
For more on Technicolor's tie-dye processing read this article here about the process when it was revived in the late 1990s.
http://www.mkpe.com/publications/d-cine ... icolor.php
I have never seen video pictures like this displayed on any type of display. The most costly studio monitor cannot show images like this. And Digital Cinema comes no where close. The lack of film grain is amazing in this dye transfer print. This film is obviously shot with a lot of high speed negative (probably pushed) and many practical lights (flaming torches) and there is little to no grain in the projected image.
Films on Blu-ray do have grain, if it is appropriate - look at Ghostbusters for example or
The images in this post explaining what grain is. It would appear in the case of the tie-dyed films, grain (or at least excessive grain) is not appropriate
no matter how you remember them from TV and VHS showings. The main reason grain exists is because later films were shot or distributed on cheaper film stock.
Why do you so stubbornly keep ignoring facts which can be supported with external references?
I was hoping for that exact release in the US. Oh well. Good for them then. 
