Snow White Re-release Platinum Discussion & Cover Art Th

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Locked
User avatar
geniuswalt
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 328
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:09 pm

Post by geniuswalt »

Deco King wrote:Glad you enjoyed the link to Brian's blog! What did you think of the Gustav Tenggren Witch? I think it's a really great atmospheric drawing/painting /image! Amazon.com has this book of Tenggren's illustrations for Disney's Snow White August 18th 2009 : http://www.amazon.com/Walt-Disneys-Whit ... 96&sr=1-11

There are lots of very interesting links regarding Walt Disney's output on the blog/Brian's website.

As you can see Brian's heart is really in what he does , and he has done lots of Disney related programmes for BBC Radio over the last few years.

Brian has had comments on the last few Disney DVD's Platinum Editions : Jungle Book , 101 Dalmatians , Sleeping Beauty , Pinocchio and next Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs!
I enjoyed reading that he was going to NYC to tape an interview for the upcoming SW platinum release, so cool!
I also liked the tenggren witch. I say liked because while I think he is a talented artist, tenggren is not exactly my favorite Disney concept artist, I prefer Mary Blair, although I read about the SW tenggren book to be released next september and I think I might buy that anyway :D

I knew Mr Sibley thorugh his many appearances in the Platinum DVDs.
Last edited by geniuswalt on Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Snow White: Platinum Edition 2009

Post by Disney Duster »

Escapay wrote:The film focuses too much on grabbing the audience through visuals and enjoyable moments that it results in the story being so mind-numbingly plain and the characters becoming nothing but caricatures of what could have been interesting and believable people. It's a gimmick movie. And amazingly, a lot of people fell for it.
You mean like how Belle could have only danced with the Beast like taking her hairy cousin to the prom, then said she loved him when he was going to die soo, and not only do we say certain things we don't mean in moments like that, but she wouldn't have to do anything to follow her claim after he died, but then she kisses him when he's a hot human! Look, she could have kissed him right when she left to take care of her father, or kissed him right before he was about to die, but no, it's only after he transforms.

Even you said at first they might have only a friendship. What if that's just what it was, there was no indication that proved it was more.
EDIT: Except the expressions and gestures like resting her shoulder and holding his hand. But often people in love with these renaissance films neglect the subtle things like that in characters of older Disney films where they say the characters are too simple and 2-dimensional so fair is fair.

So Disney did this trick to make it look like she loved him, and audiences fell for it.

But you know what? People believe she loved him. Audiences believed and felt it. So, yes, they intended her to love him, she does, and all you have to do is believe it, movies are about believing, in those drawings, in those characters, in their feelings. And Disney made audiences believe in Snow White and her feelings, too. That's Disney magic. And Disney magic is in, and was started by Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. It started it all.

I'll take a look at your reasons for this film being something audiences just fell for. Let's see. Gimmick movie? Grabbing the audience with visuals and enjoyable moments? You mean like how the stained-glass windows and computer-aided ballroom dance, long special effected transformation in Beauty and the Beast were visual gimmicks to grab the audience? Unless you would call those innovations, in which case Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs had many, many of them, as you know, that audiences even applauded for during the film (the amazing backgrounds!), only this film had these innovations way, way, way before Beauty and the Beast, and came first among animated films. Interestingly, Snow White had a long special effected transformation of it's own for the Queen, and the animators said she went through a whole lot of emotions and thoughts during it, some guy said animating her mixing the potion was very tricky for the queen's internal feelings, etc. I guess it didn't come through to you in the animation. Reminds me of what I said about noticing the subtley in the animation of the characters, though admittedly I didn't notice this about the queen either, I just didn't assume she was a caricature with few simple emotions or whatever.

Next, believable characters? Disney tried so, so hard to make believable characters, and back then, audiences and critics said they succeeded. Indeed, they did succeed at making believable characters for the audience. It is only today that we need our characters to be more and more like us in every way. You can't appreciate fairy tale archetypes? That word has gotten derogatory but it means an ideal example, like fairy tales are idealistic and romantic. And if caricatures means sticking to the character's pure evil or pure innocence, so be these perfect magical fairy tale characters for a perfect fairy tale.
EDIT: Well Snow White was suspicious of the dwarfs and wouldn't let them eat until they washed, but maybe this was still considered "fair". Also Disneykid said he thought she could be sarcastic to the dwarfs sometimes so...I dunno I would like to talk to him about that. And anyway if those are true than that makes Snow White more believable and realistic anyway.

Now, in something like Cinderella they did seem to modernize the heroine and make her and her stepmother more believable, but Snow White was the fairest one of all, possibly meaning fairest on the inside, while Cinderella was not, in her original fairy tale. Remember that Cinderella stays awake while Snow White's tale is about her protection and salvation from death. At least for the Disney version, Cinderella was meant to be older and wiser and more contend with her stepmother and even did some bad things but that's for some other discussion.

Finally, people cried at the Beast dying, right? People cried at Snow White's death, too. Beauty and the Beast got a standing ovation? Snow White had many. Beauty and the Beast got nominated for Best Picture Oscar? Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs recieved a special Oscar and seven little Oscars.

So, I dunno, this seems to say people's desires and expectations just change with the times. And that's one reason I have so much dislike towards Beauty and the Beast. It's considered so much better than other Disney films today, but it might only be because films were made differently back then and people didn't want, nay, demand the same things we do today. And they couldn't even do certain things back then (animating that prince believably for a long time, remember?).
Escapay wrote:I hated that she was so Stepford Wife-ish to the dwarfs, practically treating them as her children. I hated that she survived the trip through the enchanted forest (which is quite an impressive sequence in itself).
Interesting you picked these because I think these actually show some good things about the Shrill. She takes control of the house she just got accepted in to. It's ironic that the dwarfs say she can stay if she cooks...then she says they can't eat unless they wash! Made ya think, didn't it? Also, the fact that she survived that forest showed she had something in her, bravery or courage or strength or ability, running away from the bad. Though I like to point out that the Hunter told her to run in the first place, she still made it through the place that was after her, trying to harm her, at least in her mind, all by herself.
Image
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

Escapay, trashing Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs is the single most stupid thing you could ever do on a forum where Disney animation fans come together. It shows a profound lack of both knowledge of and appreciation for animated movies.
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Re: Snow White: Platinum Edition 2009

Post by ajmrowland »

Disney Duster wrote:
Escapay wrote:The film focuses too much on grabbing the audience through visuals and enjoyable moments that it results in the story being so mind-numbingly plain and the characters becoming nothing but caricatures of what could have been interesting and believable people. It's a gimmick movie. And amazingly, a lot of people fell for it.
You mean like how Belle could have only danced with the Beast like taking her hairy cousin to the prom, then said she loved him when he was going to die soo, and not only do we say certain things we don't mean in moments like that, but she wouldn't have to do anything to follow her claim after he died, but then she kisses him when he's a hot human! Look, she could have kissed him right when she left to take care of her father, or kissed him right before he was about to die, but no, it's only after he transforms.

Even you said at first they might have only a friendship. What if that's just what it was, there was no indication that proved it was more.
EDIT: Except the expressions and gestures like resting her shoulder and holding his hand. But often people in love with these renaissance films neglect the subtle things like that in characters of older Disney films where they say the characters are too simple and 2-dimensional so fair is fair.

So Disney did this trick to make it look like she loved him, and audiences fell for it.

But you know what? People believe she loved him. Audiences believed and felt it. So, yes, they intended her to love him, she does, and all you have to do is believe it, movies are about believing, in those drawings, in those characters, in their feelings. And Disney made audiences believe in Snow White and her feelings, too. That's Disney magic. And Disney magic is in, and was started by Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. It started it all.

I'll take a look at your reasons for this film being something audiences just fell for. Let's see. Gimmick movie? Grabbing the audience with visuals and enjoyable moments? You mean like how the stained-glass windows and computer-aided ballroom dance, long special effected transformation in Beauty and the Beast were visual gimmicks to grab the audience? Unless you would call those innovations, in which case Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs had many, many of them, as you know, that audiences even applauded for during the film (the amazing backgrounds!), only this film had these innovations way, way, way before Beauty and the Beast, and came first among animated films. Interestingly, Snow White had a long special effected transformation of it's own for the Queen, and the animators said she went through a whole lot of emotions and thoughts during it, some guy said animating her mixing the potion was very tricky for the queen's internal feelings, etc. I guess it didn't come through to you in the animation. Reminds me of what I said about noticing the subtley in the animation of the characters, though admittedly I didn't notice this about the queen either, I just didn't assume she was a caricature with few simple emotions or whatever.

Next, believable characters? Disney tried so, so hard to make believable characters, and back then, audiences and critics said they succeeded. Indeed, they did succeed at making believable characters for the audience. It is only today that we need our characters to be more and more like us in every way. You can't appreciate fairy tale archetypes? That word has gotten derogatory but it means an ideal example, like fairy tales are idealistic and romantic. And if caricatures means sticking to the character's pure evil or pure innocence, so be these perfect magical fairy tale characters for a perfect fairy tale.
EDIT: Well Snow White was suspicious of the dwarfs and wouldn't let them eat until they washed, but maybe this was still considered "fair". Also Disneykid said he thought she could be sarcastic to the dwarfs sometimes so...I dunno I would like to talk to him about that. And anyway if those are true than that makes Snow White more believable and realistic anyway.

Now, in something like Cinderella they did seem to modernize the heroine and make her and her stepmother more believable, but Snow White was the fairest one of all, possibly meaning fairest on the inside, while Cinderella was not, in her original fairy tale. Remember that Cinderella stays awake while Snow White's tale is about her protection and salvation from death. At least for the Disney version, Cinderella was meant to be older and wiser and more contend with her stepmother and even did some bad things but that's for some other discussion.

Finally, people cried at the Beast dying, right? People cried at Snow White's death, too. Beauty and the Beast got a standing ovation? Snow White had many. Beauty and the Beast got nominated for Best Picture Oscar? Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs recieved a special Oscar and seven little Oscars.

So, I dunno, this seems to say people's desires and expectations just change with the times. And that's one reason I have so much dislike towards Beauty and the Beast. It's considered so much better than other Disney films today, but it might only be because films were made differently back then and people didn't want, nay, demand the same things we do today. And they couldn't even do certain things back then (animating that prince believably for a long time, remember?).
Escapay wrote:I hated that she was so Stepford Wife-ish to the dwarfs, practically treating them as her children. I hated that she survived the trip through the enchanted forest (which is quite an impressive sequence in itself).
Interesting you picked these because I think these actually show some good things about the Shrill. She takes control of the house she just got accepted in to. It's ironic that the dwarfs say she can stay if she cooks...then she says they can't eat unless they wash! Made ya think, didn't it? Also, the fact that she survived that forest showed she had something in her, bravery or courage or strength or ability, running away from the bad. Though I like to point out that the Hunter told her to run in the first place, she still made it through the place that was after her, trying to harm her, at least in her mind, all by herself.
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Image
User avatar
Beast_enchantment
Special Edition
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: The West Wing, UK
Contact:

Post by Beast_enchantment »

What did Escapay say??? And how come the subject has drifted onto Beauty and the Beast bashing? :roll:
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n71/ ... nner-1.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Don't Call It a Comeback, I've Been Here For Years...
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

Beast_enchantment wrote:What did Escapay say??? And how come the subject has drifted onto Beauty and the Beast bashing? :roll:
You didn't hear? They're cross-promoting the films!

No, seriously, It's the same on any forum: If two or more topics are even remotely related they'll cross into each other. Even if something is totally unrelated to the topic at hand, it'll get replies.
Image
User avatar
Deco King
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 5:26 am
Location: Ribchester, Preston, Lancashire, England
Contact:

Artists should recapture original beauty of Snow White!

Post by Deco King »

Look up Animation Art For Sale on Google! Look at the fine production drawings for Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, and compare these to the lifeless mess that passes for Snow White Cover Art!!

The new Cover Art image really is a dull lifeless mess in comparison to the beautiful individual drawings of the Witch/Snow White and all the delightful individual Dwarfs from sites such as Animation Art Gallery , sadly out of this fan's pocket money range but marvellous nevertheless!
Last edited by Deco King on Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
To Make Doubly Sure Bring Back Her Heart In This!!
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Re: Artists should recapture original beauty of Snow White!

Post by ajmrowland »

Deco King wrote:Look up Animation Art For Sale on Google! Look at the fine production drawings for Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, and compare these to the lifeless mess that passes for Snw White Cover Art!!

It really is a dull lifeless mess in comparison to the beautiful individual drawings of the Witch/Snow White and all the delightful individual Dwarfs from sites such as Animation Art Gallery , sadly out of this fan's pocket money range but marvellous nevertheless!
That's mass production for ya! Cheapness all around!
Image
User avatar
Escapay
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 12562
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
Contact:

Post by Escapay »

Rather than quote everything you said, Disney Duster, I'll just say you've got your likes/dislikes, and I've got mine. Plus, I'm still weak from my fever so I can't really say much else anyway. Although I have to ask, what exactly made you decide to suddenly reply to something I said like, four months ago?
Goliath wrote:Escapay, trashing Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs is the single most stupid thing you could ever do on a forum where Disney animation fans come together. It shows a profound lack of both knowledge of and appreciation for animated movies.
Yes, god forbid I actually have an opinion instead of sharing the herd mentality. :roll:

My knowledge, love, and appreciation (or anyone's for that matter) for Disney animation should not hinge upon some undying love and loyalty to "the one that started it all". Good god, what's next, shunning of the live-action features simply because not many of the Disney animation fans are remotely aware of them?
Beast_enchanthment wrote:What did Escapay say???
Click Here, but I'll just quote the SW part. I've also bolded a part that Goliath himself should read...
Me on October 11 wrote:From this old March 2007 post (I've since warmed up to Cinderella so disregard the part about it being one of the worst)...

What's ironic is that when I was younger, I really loved parts of the film, mainly because I was brought up on the first two Sing-Along Songs VHS tapes: Heigh-Ho, which included that and "The Silly Song" among its other musical offerings, and Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah, which included "Whistle While You Work". Those sequences entranced me as a kid and I longed to actually see the film. Of course, since its last theatrical outing was 1987, and I didn't see my first theatrical film until 1992 (Aladdin, which is and always will be my #1 favorite Disney film), our family had to wait for the 1994 VHS to come out for us to rent (and for us to illegally record it to a blank tape...yeah, bad Escapay!).

Anyway, come 1994, I had finally seen Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in full. And I was not as impressed as I hoped I'd be. Mainly the voice. It was always the voice that got to me. I had always read that Walt wanted a child's voice, someone that sounded young. He passed up on Deanna Durbin because her voice was too deep, too mature. And who'd he pick? A shrilly high-pitched breaks-glass one-octave-too-high-only-dogs-should-be-able-to-hear-it Adriana Caselotti. Big mistake. It turns what could have been at least a tolerable character into a downright annoying one. I didn't care at all for her at all, I hated how perky and happy she looked cleaning the castle steps or cleaning the house. I hated that she was so Stepford Wife-ish to the dwarfs, practically treating them as her children. I hated that she survived the trip through the enchanted forest (which is quite an impressive sequence in itself). All in all, I hated her character through and through and she was one of the biggest reasons why I rarely watch the film.

I think, though, that the main reason this film is my second least favorite after the tripe known as The Lion King, is because it's been built up by plenty of people over the years as this awesome and wonderful fairy tale that will melt your heart and make you fall in love with Disney. But...it's not. It's simply the first film from Disney, and it made an impact 70 years ago, but that impact seems to have diminished in later years. Nowadays people only know the film by the barrage of Princess merchandise or by one song. It aged gracefully, but still doesn't quite shine as good as it used to. And it's fairly mediocre compared to the films that followed it. Pinocchio and Fantasia are such grand and epic films that when you size Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs up to it, it pales greatly.

It's just that...well, the film is best known as the first, the "one that started it all". But beyond a couple good songs and the incomparable dwarfs, there's not much else I feel it has going for it. And it's just...dull. If I ever do sit to watch the film, I know I'll simply skip to a few chapters and call it a day. I just could never sit through it all in one sitting without shifting around or glancing at my watch.


I still agree with much of what I wrote. It's not a film that I can ever really enjoy when I watch, mainly because I've got such a disdain for the Shrill (be it her voice, her personality, her attitude, etc). And there's really not much that I can enjoy if like 70% of the film is focused on her (and the other 30% is about characters whose actions are based around her). The film focuses too much on grabbing the audience through visuals and enjoyable moments that it results in the story being so mind-numbingly plain and the characters becoming nothing but caricatures of what could have been interesting and believable people. It's a gimmick movie. And amazingly, a lot of people fell for it.

I'm not going to attempt to "like it more" just because it is important in Disney history. That's a bullsh!t excuse and one that I refuse to follow. Hell, I don't like Citizen Kane either and that's easily one of the most important films in cinema history.

I'm grateful for the opportunities the film gave to Disney, and I respect the work that it took to make it, as well as its highly-regarded position in the Disney Company. But no matter how much respect or gratitude I can heap it, it still doesn't change the fact that I simply do not like the film as a whole, and that there are too many things I dislike than there are things I like. I can be critical of it, I can make fun of it, and I can trash it as much as I want because in the end, it's only (and always) a matter of opinion.


I don't feel bad about my opinions about the Shrill, even if they can be hurtful towards people who think that the Shrill is the sun and the moon, or who were deeply affected by watching it. After all, to Jane Doe Thornton who loves the film, what I think of it is bollocks to her anyway. Just as what she thinks of The Rocketeer is bollocks to me. If you love a film enough, you can take all the criticisms other people have in stride. ;)

Perhaps the only complaint I have about Shrill-bashing is from people who do it simply because of the film's importance, or because of its tie-in to merch lines. And these bashers never offer any real reason why they dislike it, instead they just throw out empty insults that don't meean much. It's one thing to be critical about the film, it's another to blindly and emptily hate it for the sake of hating something.
albert
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion? :p

WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

Escapay wrote:
Goliath wrote:Escapay, trashing Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs is the single most stupid thing you could ever do on a forum where Disney animation fans come together. It shows a profound lack of both knowledge of and appreciation for animated movies.
Yes, god forbid I actually have an opinion instead of sharing the herd mentality. :roll:

My knowledge, love, and appreciation (or anyone's for that matter) for Disney animation should not hinge upon some undying love and loyalty to "the one that started it all".
Your 'argument' is a false one and you know it. Because nobody said you couldn't have a different opinion. But this is a classic 'victim role' people on this message board like to play: when someone calls bullshit, they act like that person want to deprive them of their precious opinion. No, it's nothing like that. It's just that I expect your opinion to be based on something substantial. If you're going to trash a film like this one, I expect there to be valid reasons for it; *not* trying to delegitimize my argument by falsely pretending I only argue this way because it's the opinion of "the herd", or that this film was "the one that started it all".

Snow White is a great film, because of the character animation. There are some minor weak ponts, like relying on rotoscoping for Snow White and the Prince in the beginning and end of the movie, but for the most part Walt Disney, in 1937!, succeeded on animating believeable characters that can hold the interest of an audience for more than an hour. That's quite an achievement. The animation is very subtle in place. Like Bill Tytla's wonderful animation of Grumpy, especially at Snow White's coffin. He's not bursting into tears immediately, but he's first trying to hold himself together, then looking desperate, and only *then* tearing up. That's incredible sophisticated animation that you will find all throughout the film, and it's most apparent in the dwarfs. Walt Disney has succeede in giving seven supposedly similar creatures (as described in the Grimms' tale) all believable, distinct personalities. Add to that memorable songs, timeless humor and an engaging story and you have a masterpiece.

Your not liking the voice is irrelevant, because that's a matter of personal preference. It has got nothing to do with objectively judging a historical film.
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

Goliath wrote:
Escapay wrote: Yes, god forbid I actually have an opinion instead of sharing the herd mentality. :roll:

My knowledge, love, and appreciation (or anyone's for that matter) for Disney animation should not hinge upon some undying love and loyalty to "the one that started it all".
Your 'argument' is a false one and you know it. Because nobody said you couldn't have a different opinion. But this is a classic 'victim role' people on this message board like to play: when someone calls bullshit, they act like that person want to deprive them of their precious opinion. No, it's nothing like that. It's just that I expect your opinion to be based on something substantial. If you're going to trash a film like this one, I expect there to be valid reasons for it; *not* trying to delegitimize my argument by falsely pretending I only argue this way because it's the opinion of "the herd", or that this film was "the one that started it all".

Snow White is a great film, because of the character animation. There are some minor weak ponts, like relying on rotoscoping for Snow White and the Prince in the beginning and end of the movie, but for the most part Walt Disney, in 1937!, succeeded on animating believeable characters that can hold the interest of an audience for more than an hour. That's quite an achievement. The animation is very subtle in place. Like Bill Tytla's wonderful animation of Grumpy, especially at Snow White's coffin. He's not bursting into tears immediately, but he's first trying to hold himself together, then looking desperate, and only *then* tearing up. That's incredible sophisticated animation that you will find all throughout the film, and it's most apparent in the dwarfs. Walt Disney has succeed in giving seven supposedly similar creatures (as described in the Grimms' tale) all believable, distinct personalities. Add to that memorable songs, timeless humor and an engaging story and you have a masterpiece.

Your not liking the voice is irrelevant, because that's a matter of personal preference. It has got nothing to do with objectively judging a historical film.
Interesting, cause most people would view the Dwarves as cartoony. You make a good point. I never saw it that way. Surely, they had distinct personalities, but......
Image
User avatar
Sky Syndrome
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1187
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:07 am
Location: Maine

Post by Sky Syndrome »

Since Pinocchio Platinum's cover art has the puppet holding an apple, Snow White Platinum II's cover art should show Snow White and Pinocchio fighting over the apple and Grumpy's about to smash Pinokes's head in with a mining pick and maybe the hag snickering at one side. :lol:

Hope you're right as rain soon, Escapay!
Image
yukitora
Special Edition
Posts: 947
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:01 am
Location: at home apparently
Contact:

Post by yukitora »

LOL.

I'd totally buy that.
User avatar
Kram Nebuer
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1992
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 2:03 pm
Location: Happiest Place on Earth :)
Contact:

Post by Kram Nebuer »

Goliath wrote:
Escapay wrote: Yes, god forbid I actually have an opinion instead of sharing the herd mentality. :roll:

My knowledge, love, and appreciation (or anyone's for that matter) for Disney animation should not hinge upon some undying love and loyalty to "the one that started it all".
Your 'argument' is a false one and you know it. Because nobody said you couldn't have a different opinion. But this is a classic 'victim role' people on this message board like to play: when someone calls bullshit, they act like that person want to deprive them of their precious opinion. No, it's nothing like that. It's just that I expect your opinion to be based on something substantial. If you're going to trash a film like this one, I expect there to be valid reasons for it; *not* trying to delegitimize my argument by falsely pretending I only argue this way because it's the opinion of "the herd", or that this film was "the one that started it all".

Snow White is a great film, because of the character animation. There are some minor weak ponts, like relying on rotoscoping for Snow White and the Prince in the beginning and end of the movie, but for the most part Walt Disney, in 1937!, succeeded on animating believeable characters that can hold the interest of an audience for more than an hour. That's quite an achievement. The animation is very subtle in place. Like Bill Tytla's wonderful animation of Grumpy, especially at Snow White's coffin. He's not bursting into tears immediately, but he's first trying to hold himself together, then looking desperate, and only *then* tearing up. That's incredible sophisticated animation that you will find all throughout the film, and it's most apparent in the dwarfs. Walt Disney has succeede in giving seven supposedly similar creatures (as described in the Grimms' tale) all believable, distinct personalities. Add to that memorable songs, timeless humor and an engaging story and you have a masterpiece.

Your not liking the voice is irrelevant, because that's a matter of personal preference. It has got nothing to do with objectively judging a historical film.
I don't think you fully understood what Escapay was saying. He wasn't saying it was a bad film with the animation or anything, he was just saying that he doesn't like it because he doesn't like Snow White's voice among other things. He admitted that the visuals were breathtaking and groundbreaking and ushered Disney into a period of success and a long lasting career in Hollywood, but he's simply saying, despite all of this, he just doesn't like the movie. It's his personal opinion. "Not liking the voice" is certainly irrelevant if you're judging the movie as a visual piece of art, but when looking at Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs as a film among others, he simply doesn't like it for the reasons he clearly stated. I was shocked when I read that people said he was trashing it, but he wasn't at all. He was just saying why he doesn't enjoy watching the movie as a whole. He's not forcing anyone to not like it too. He's just saying why he doesn't because it certainly makes one wonder why one would anyway. In this case, he values the overall story, characterizations, and voice talent over the history and animation quality.

Just try and think of why people enjoy movies. It seems that you enjoy them based mostly on the animation, which isn't a bad thing at all. To each his own. Others may look at the whole package and others may enjoy movies for the story or the whole package. You're lucky if a movie succeeds in everything.

Heck, I love Cinderella III because it's such a fun, fast paced, story. Okay, many will say NO IT"S A SEQUEL, but I love Cinderella III and I showed it to my friends here at college and they loved it too. Some like it more than the original. True, the original's animation and art is loads better than the 3rd movie, but let's face it, it was made for a 1950s family audience. Times have changed and me and my friends found the story of the 3rd movie much more engaging. True, some moments were cheesy and silly, but that's what made the movie memorable.

It's all a matter of opinion anyway. I just want to say you're right to defend SWatSD for everything it represented and its animation and memorable songs and moments, but I think that you're wrong to try and say Escapay's wrong when he's simply saying why he personally does not enjoy watching SWatSD as a film by itself. We can't like them all; Escapay just happens to not like the ones that the whole world loves, but at least he has reasons why. Just talk to him.
Image
<a href=http://kramnebuer.dvdaf.com/>My ºoº DVDs </a>
User avatar
Deco King
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 5:26 am
Location: Ribchester, Preston, Lancashire, England
Contact:

Lucille La Verne the probable model for The Witch !

Post by Deco King »

I never tire of watching this wonderful movie, it has so many beautifully animated sequences , : the Wicked Queen's initial question for the Slave in the Magic Mirror , Snow White's run through the scary forest after the Huntsman has warned her of the Wicked Queen's plan to have her killed , the discovery of the Dwarf's cottage , the Whistle While You Work cleaning the Dwarfs cottage the Silly Song dance sequence , the Wicked Queen's flight down the stairs after the Slave in the Magic Mirror has told her that Snow White still lives , the transformation and subsequent Poisoned Apple dipping scene etc.

We take animated movies for granted but this was the first and IMHO still the finest full length animated movie that Disney ever made!

I wonder if Lucille La Verne the voice of the Wicked Queen /Witch or Peddler Woman did the live modelling for the Rotoscoping of the Live Characters? I have seen a frame of an actress in the Queen's regal garb , but never a movie of the Witch , although thinking about it , there are stills of a heavily made up male actor is seen clambering up the rocks as a guide for the animators of one of the penultimate scenes of the the Witch's flight up the mountainside towards the end of the movie!

If you watch the 1935 version A Tale Of Two Cities starring Ronald Colman , the actress who provided the voice of the Wicked Queen - Lucille Laverne - appears as an old hag La Vengeance cackling by the Guillotine , and I'm sure Disney must have seen this and thought of the Witch in Snow White!
To Make Doubly Sure Bring Back Her Heart In This!!
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 14017
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs: Platinum Edition

Post by Disney Duster »

Ajmrowland, thank you very much. Really, thank you. :)

Escapay, if all you said was that you just disliked the film, I wouldn't have written that. But you said, basically, with your words, that the film was not very good. I mean, what is "it's a gimmick film that everyone surprisingly fell for" supposed to mean? And saying the characters are only caricatures when they tried and most people thought they succeeded at making them believable, you mean that's not saying the film is bad, it's only saying you dislike it? And I will say it again, doesn't matter what you think, when Walt and all his artists put so, so much effort into trying to make the characters real, believable, and yes, even deep and complicated as I have read in many places including specifically "The Disney Villain", you can't say they are indeed caricatures, just say they come off that way or something. But You were attacking the film saying things about it were bad or mediocre or lackluster or not good in some way. And I decided to write to it now because I remembered, I had time, and I felt it was important. Yes, indeed I did.

Kram Nebuer, it's really cool you defended your brother, but see above.

Deco King, in my book "The Art if Walt Disney", it shows a sketch made of Lucille Laverne during one of her dramatic readings of the witch's lines. But this could just be how they always do this for every voice actor because the animators tend to use characteristics and movements of the voice actors for the characters as well as the live-action models and their own imaginations and ideas. But I don't remember if I read if they used her as an actual model for some scenes or not.
Image
BambiFan87
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:31 pm
Location: Halifax, PA
Contact:

Post by BambiFan87 »

Me and my best friend LOVE everything to do with disney for the most part. we know all the movies and a lot of lines and most of the characters. we critique the dvd covers and the bonus features and everything else. We both agree 100% that snow white is almost unwatchable because of her VOICE!!!! its sooo annoying. :)
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

ajmrowland wrote:Interesting, cause most people would view the Dwarves as cartoony. You make a good point. I never saw it that way. Surely, they had distinct personalities, but......
Well, of course they are cartoony in the way they are drawn. They are, after all, still dwarfs; they're fairy tale characters. And they behave silly at times. Not all dwarfs are as well rounded out, but I think certainly Doc and Grumpy show much subtelty (sp?) in their relationship to Snow White.
Kram Nebuer wrote:I don't think you fully understood what Escapay was saying. He wasn't saying it was a bad film with the animation or anything, he was just saying that he doesn't like it because he doesn't like Snow White's voice among other things. He admitted that the visuals were breathtaking and groundbreaking and ushered Disney into a period of success and a long lasting career in Hollywood, but he's simply saying, despite all of this, he just doesn't like the movie. It's his personal opinion.
There's nothing wrong with expressing an opinion on a film, and I would be the last person to say he has no right to his opinion. But what I like to do, is to seperate personal preference from 'objectively' judging a film (realizing nothing is *ever* 100% objective, but you get my point).
Kram Nebuer wrote:"Not liking the voice" is certainly irrelevant if you're judging the movie as a visual piece of art, but when looking at Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs as a film among others, he simply doesn't like it for the reasons he clearly stated. I was shocked when I read that people said he was trashing it, but he wasn't at all. He was just saying why he doesn't enjoy watching the movie as a whole. He's not forcing anyone to not like it too. He's just saying why he doesn't because it certainly makes one wonder why one would anyway. In this case, he values the overall story, characterizations, and voice talent over the history and animation quality.
Escapay said the film is "a gimmick movie". He said the film only was a succes because it lured the audience with pretty visuals (I'm parafrasing here). That, to me, constitues "trashing". And because Escapay uses such strong language (in fact, he always uses strong language when expressing his opinion), I have no doubt he won't mind me replying with strong words myself.

I pointed out a few things where Escapay is wrong. I started with animation. That doesn't mean animation is the only thing I value, but Escapay stated the film is a "gimmick movie" and the visuals are only there to impress the audience, and the animation doesn't provide for believable characters. So naturally, that's the first thing I adress. I'm sure we will discuss story later on, because from what I've read from him, he enjoys a good discussion as well, and he doesn't shy away from it.
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Re: Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs: Platinum Edition

Post by ajmrowland »

Disney Duster wrote:Ajmrowland, thank you very much. Really, thank you. :)

You're welcome.

Deco King, in my book "The Art if Walt Disney", it shows a sketch made of Lucille Laverne during one of her dramatic readings of the witch's lines. But this could just be how they always do this for every voice actor because the animators tend to use characteristics and movements of the voice actors for the characters as well as the live-action models and their own imaginations and ideas. But I don't remember if I read if they used her as an actual model for some scenes or not.
I have the same book, and actually spent a few minutes reading it last week. You don't happen to remember the page number, do you? No wait! you're talking about the sketch of the Queen in front of the MM, aren't you?

Oh, and upon opening the cover, the characters have a few color changes. But, of course, you probably noticed.

And it also calls the image of Dopey with the diamonds in his eyes "frightening". I always thought it was intended for comical effect. maybe, the writer just misinterpreted.

GoliathWrote:
Goliath wrote:Well, of course they are cartoony in the way they are drawn. They are, after all, still dwarfs; they're fairy tale characters. And they behave silly at times. Not all dwarfs are as well rounded out, but I think certainly Doc and Grumpy show much subtelty (sp?) in their relationship to Snow White.
Yeah, I guess. At least their animation would've been sophisticated for the time Nowadays, though, the funeral scene would look almost comical. The two characters you mentioned do have some subtlety, at least. I honestly don't get the same effect, watching the movie, as those who grew up with it.
Image
Marky_198
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1019
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 11:06 am

Post by Marky_198 »

ajmrowland wrote:
Besides, technology has advanced far too much for the scene to fit comfortably back into the film. It's not like disney could just go beck to Ink and Paint Girls and 70 yr old film cameras.
Exactly!

How dare they even think of this?
Walt would roll over in his grave!!!!
The idea is really rude and respectless.
We're talking about Walt's masterpiece Snowwhite here!
You can't just throw scenes in or out!!!!!

I assume they are giving this film a modern, computer generated 2009 look anyway, like they do with all the films, so the scene would fit in perfectly, but the idea alone.........unacceptable.

Just like the Lion King, the just put the morning report in, but when you watch the film, it's always there. I haven't figured out how to find the version without that scene on the disc, although I know it should be on there somewhere. So basically it's pushed through people's throats.
Locked