
I find it more likable and interesting than several of the more preferred classics / masterpieces, like Lady and the Tramp, Bambi, and Beauty and the Beast.
Maybe it's because blue and orange or complimentary colours? An artistic coincidence perhaps? Not that you'll ever reply to this, which reminds me....Prince Phillip wrote:I saw it, way back whenIggieKuzco wrote:this is somthing i wrote on this thread about a month ago and i never got an answer.... i dont think ppl saw it and i want to know what u guys think:
reply!![]()
I guess in response I would have to say NO CONNECTION!!!!!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Actually who knows, maybe there is one, it is interesting...
I found it boring and lazy, because it's so standard for wizards in cartoons/comics. You need a wizard? Well, he's got a pointy hat, and a long beard, and glasses etc. I expect Disney to do more, to put more effort into their character designs.Chernabog_Rocks wrote:I also don't see what's wrong with the big nose, the tache, long beard and glasses. What would you have rather seen on him?
Like Bill Peet basing Merlin's nose of Walt's? Site examples of Wizards in animation prior to Merlin that feature the same look. Some Silly Symphony cartoons? but hats and robes in general are similar to begin with. What you deem unoriginal may work best for what the character is meant to be in terms of personality in the end and another design may not have been as effective. I'm sure Disney did more than just one drawing in trying to develop his character design.Goliath wrote:I found it boring and lazy, because it's so standard for wizards in cartoons/comics. You need a wizard? Well, he's got a pointy hat, and a long beard, and glasses etc. I expect Disney to do more, to put more effort into their character designs.Chernabog_Rocks wrote:I also don't see what's wrong with the big nose, the tache, long beard and glasses. What would you have rather seen on him?
What exactly would you suggest?Goliath wrote:I found it boring and lazy, because it's so standard for wizards in cartoons/comics. You need a wizard? Well, he's got a pointy hat, and a long beard, and glasses etc. I expect Disney to do more, to put more effort into their character designs.Chernabog_Rocks wrote:I also don't see what's wrong with the big nose, the tache, long beard and glasses. What would you have rather seen on him?
You do that too?!?????? I thought I was the only one. I make myself and my kids sit down and watch every Disney animated (and some live-action) movie we own before going on each and every Disney trip.Flanger-Hanger wrote:...which I re-watched today as part of my Going-to-WDW Disney Filmathon.
There are certain films I even save watching until I'm about to go. Stuff like Sleeping Beauty. Bedknobs, Cinderella, 101 Dalmatians etc. I break that rule if a new release happens (like Beauty last October) but I try to keep it like this.kbehm29 wrote:You do that too?!?????? I thought I was the only one.Flanger-Hanger wrote:...which I re-watched today as part of my Going-to-WDW Disney Filmathon.
What's original about that? It still is just a nose. I'm talking about the whole character design.Flanger-Hanger wrote:Like Bill Peet basing Merlin's nose of Walt's?
As I've understood it, Disney himself didn't have much, if anything, to do with the film. He gave Peet and Reithermann the free hand.Flanger-Hanger wrote:I'm sure Disney did more than just one drawing in trying to develop his character design.
I don't have an 'issue' with them, because that sounds so overly dramatic. I just don't like it. And that has nothing to do with being uninformed. Frankly, saying it's uninformed isn't very polite. Besides, a good film stands on its own. One shouldn't need to read a book first to appreciate a film.Flangr-Hanger wrote:Those events are all based off the book and Disney cut two additional transformations in order to tighten the plot which has very good pacing. If you have an issue with them I suggest you read the book and then make an informed opinion.
While that undoubtely is true for alot of people, it isn't true for me. There are tons of memorable songs in classic films like Snow White, Peter Pan, Junglebook etc. Just none in Sword.Flanger-Hanger wrote:As for the songs, once again it's a matter of opinion. Weak or just different? People today are just too used to the modern Broadway style of recent Disney songs to appreciate the older, simpler style that dominated most of Disney's earlier features.
All based of Peet's original drawings like the other characters, backgrounds etc. If you look at his children's books you can see how he draws his charactres and the animator's adapted this style, and just labeling it "unoriginal" shows how unfamiliar you are with it (which is not your fault but just look more into what the artists does first, I doubt he intended his creations to look "unoriginal). Note how Merlin's hat isn't just a pointed one it bends with odd angles and such and having comedic touches like his pink boxer shorts and white undershirt beneath it all add to his design.Goliath wrote:What's original about that? It still is just a nose. I'm talking about the whole character design.
Because of their success with Dalmatians. Peet was the only man Walt trusted to single handedly board and entire movie. Also Disney had reasons to get less involved with animation (this was way before sword came along) with projects like Disneyland ,The World's Fair, Mary Poppins etc. He know doubt trusted hi team and called the shots as to who did what, it still shows his stamp because of the way he had taught the animators and directors beforehand. the film is unmistakably Disney and just because it's not heavy with drama (and why should it be? Sleeping Beauty was criticized for being too serious and Dalmatians was a hit for being light hearted and comedic) it's not "Walt" enough for some?Goliath wrote:As I've understood it, Disney himself didn't have much, if anything, to do with the film. He gave Peet and Reithermann the free hand.
Yes but one should at least get the purpose of these episodes as clearly explained through the situations, the dialouge, lyrics of the songs etc. It's hard to miss. saying they have "nothing to do with pulling a sword from a stone" is ridiculous as the sword pulling is trivial compared to the main issues addressed before and after it. Besides wart had to do that act on his own anyway and find out it's importance.Goliath wrote:I don't have an 'issue' with them, because that sounds so overly dramatic. I just don't like it. And that has nothing to do with being uninformed. Frankly, saying it's uninformed isn't very polite. Besides, a good film stands on its own. One shouldn't need to read a book first to appreciate a film.
You really shouldn't keep insulting me by repeating I'm not familiar with the process of animation, just because I hold a different opinion. I would bet I know as much as you, if not more, about it. Of course I'm not saying Peet intended it to look 'unoriginal'. I'm just saying I find it to be unoriginal, because it's a standard outfit for wizards in comics/cartoons.Flanger-Hanger wrote:All based of Peet's original drawings like the other characters, backgrounds etc. If you look at his children's books you can see how he draws his charactres and the animator's adapted this style, and just labeling it "unoriginal" shows how unfamiliar you are with it (which is not your fault but just look more into what the artists does first, I doubt he intended his creations to look "unoriginal).
Who said a film has to be 'heavy on drama' to be "Walt enough"? Ever seen One Hundred and One Dalmatians or The Jungle Book? They are at least as light-hearted as Sword. Jungle Book shows Walt's hand in the departure from the Kipling stories and making it into a unique *Disney*-film. It shows Walt's hand in the characters, their acting, interaction, personalities etc. Jungle Book, besides being funny, has a heart. Sword comes off as an assembly line product.Flanger-Hanger wrote:[...] the film is unmistakably Disney and just because it's not heavy with drama it's not "Walt" enough for some?
I'm talking about storytelling here. How do you best translate the message that Merlin's lessons are connected with Wart pulling out the sword? They failed at doing a good job on that; they dropped the ball. Wart still want to be Kay's assistant, and that's why he looks for a sword. He's still captivated by the idea of one day becoming a knight himself. He isn't thinking about Merlin's lessons, or studying or those kind of things.Flanger-Hanger wrote:saying they have "nothing to do with pulling a sword from a stone" is ridiculous as the sword pulling is trivial compared to the main issues addressed before and after it. Besides wart had to do that act on his own anyway and find out it's importance.