
Cheers,
JM

He insulted the great Chuck Norris in this post.Disney-Fan wrote:Seriously? I can't think of a single reason for his suspension.![]()
I'm puzzled by his suspension as well. The last couple days he's been pretty tame, and I can't find any suspension-worthy posts in his posting history. Unless it's the whole "Family Guy sucks, and people who watch it are mindless idiots who have no grasp of true humor!" debacle.Lazario wrote:Walker Texas Ranger needs to be preserved as a series in some Museum of Modern Film & TV Art - it's one of those amazing examples of "So Bad-It's Good." Much like Full House, you just get the feeling that the writers are either sellouts or insane. And the actors are definitely crazy. The quality of the show leaves the viewer with so many questions. The biggest of which is clearly - "is this for real?" Is this like some kind of complex, ahead-of-its'-time satire? Or is it a kind of Dragnet-update? I mean, when I look at NYPD Blue and say- "their criminals seem realistic" (in comparison)... you know something's amiss. I'm from the school that thinks you actually have to put the criminal(s) and the cop(s) on the same level if we're to understand the criminal mind. This show just exploits what it thinks the criminal mind is like. Or what it doesn't think. And basically ends up a sappy, ultra-trashy show. Where the criminals are like the Teens being peer-pressured in an after-school special and the cops are playing the timelessly, relentlessly comatose "Macho, Cool, and Dressed to Kill" cliche. And the whole time, instead of taking this ridiculous show seriously- I have to wonder how smart Chuck Norris actually is.
Let me assure you that the moderators aren't in the habit of suspending members without reason. In this case, there was actually more than one single reason.Disney-Fan wrote:Seriously? I can't think of a single reason for his suspension.![]()
Oh, I'm well aware. The mods around here do a great job. My comment was in no way an attempt at accusation! I was just a bit perplexed as to why is all. Thanks for clearing the air, Aaron, even if it isn't a part of the job description.AwallaceUNC wrote:Let me assure you that the moderators aren't in the habit of suspending members without reason. In this case, there was actually more than one single reason.Disney-Fan wrote:Seriously? I can't think of a single reason for his suspension.![]()
-Aaron
Clearly, you didn't learn a lesson. Maybe another week will help. Such hostility and negativity is just not welcome here.Lazario wrote:My suspension was a complete and utter crock of horse-s***. And everyone who took part in it are a bunch of whiny, two-timing, back-stabbing cowards.
I would like to thank Aaron for being very polite and upfront about everything... However, a message to the moderators at UD - you procrastinators need to clean yourselves up first.
I hate to be out of the loop. Who's been suspended recently and who is now keeping company with Tangela, lolopimp, Disneybell, princesssnowbunny, and a few others?memnv wrote:I see it has been a busy week one suspension and one in the vault this week already. and no it is not Laz or the personI expected to be banned
Don't forget sotiris2006 was suspended for repeat signature violations too.Escapay wrote:ETA:
Never mind. I see that danfrandes is suspended while disneyfreak90 (aka Disneyfreak1990) is in the vaults. I'm guessing that DF90's "new" account was banned and Luke gave him his old password (which, IIRC, he said he couldn't remember) so he could use his first account.
Yay! Do I get a special prize? Bah, no matter, I'll just give myself a pink elephant!AwallaceUNC wrote:as Escapay correctly guessed