The Little Mermaid III Discussion

purin · Post by **purin** » Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:28 pm

Off model, you mean? Well, she is supposed to be at least 10 years older, so in some scenes it looks like her waist is a little thicker...
(And in the TLM III sneak peek she doesn't have lipstick. I wonder when she started applying it)

(Actually, I think that the big problem with Ariel's looks when she's done nowadays is that they've finally decided what on model is for her and they stick to it too well. I've always noticed that something's always "off" about the way Ariel looks in the original TLM... but not necessarily in a bad way.)

Disneyfreak1990 · Post by **Disneyfreak1990** » Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:05 pm

she probably started doing lipstick in her teen years. in the preveiw she looks about 14/15 so probably a little before the movie or she probably forogt to put her lipstick on in that scene since its night and it seems she snuck out and who would put lipstick on just to sneak out at night?

Atlantica · Post by **Atlantica** » Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:10 pm

I've heard this lipstick / no lipstick thing before; but I've never really noticed it! But looking at screencaps right now, there is a great difference. It really changes her face.

Disneyfreak1990 · Post by **Disneyfreak1990** » Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:18 pm

and lets not forget her ditsyness

. she just sounds like it in the trailer and she really is in kingdom hearts to the point she trusts Ursula... TWICE. the first time was to give her the trident so Ariel can go to other worlds and the gang plus Ariel kill her but a year later she has no clue who Ursula is

and does the movie all over again. how ditsy can one teenage mermaid get?

Super Aurora · Post by **Super Aurora** » Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:59 pm

Disneyfreak1990 wrote:and lets not forget her ditsyness . she just sounds like it in the trailer and she really is in kingdom hearts to the point she trusts Ursula... TWICE. the first time was to give her the trident so Ariel can go to other worlds and the gang plus Ariel kill her but a year later she has no clue who Ursula is and does the movie all over again. how ditsy can one teenage mermaid get?

Or how redundant and repetitive can a game get?

Disneyfreak1990 · Post by **Disneyfreak1990** » Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:40 pm

well the game was dull anyway since the stories were just the movies and who would want a game with disney that originally had wonderful original stories but then change the stories into the films? heck my favorite movie that made it i hated because it was ruined and you can't recreate a classic. if your wondering which movie i'm talking about its BATB. i loved how Belle and Beast were done in the first game, an outcast who's love was taken from him along with his world and his will got him to his love and would whatever it took to get her back from Maleficent, but then in the sequel he just kept hurting people and even thretened to throw Belle out of the castle just because Xaldin stole the rose and blamed her for it. if they had just gave the game that same magic and story originalness it would've been better instead of a rehash of movies stuffed into a game.

purin · Post by **purin** » Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:52 am

Yeah, I didn't notice the lack of lipstick immediately, either. I was thinking "Hm, I can't put my finger on it... OH, wait. I can. It's the lipstick." All Disney women have their lips lined and colored (unlike, say, children and men), but that bright red lipstick makes a huge difference in setting her apart from the other princesses.

It doesn't matter, because Belle elbowing Xaldin in the stomach and running off grinning ear to ear made it all worth it! XD

(Actually, yeah, the second game's actual acting out of the stories of the movies instead of simply setting little plots inside its universe and canon the way the first game did for the most part did strike me as a little odd, since now we can't use those games' worlds anymore. We're going to need new Disney Worlds in future games)

Disneyfreak1990 · Post by **Disneyfreak1990** » Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:10 pm

the only worlds that were original were Disney Castle, Timeless River, Space Paranoids, and the Colosium since they take place after the film, outside the film's origins, or it never happens and those worlds were still lame except for Space Paranoids. if the worlds were in the first game they would've been a million times better than the piece of junk they gave us and what was the story? destroy a group of people that want to be whole again? what's so wrong about that? and when you started into the worlds the 'story' was gone until you went to the world that never was. i hope the next game goes down the path of the first and not make it the easiest thing since microwave popcorn. i liked the diffuculty of the first since you could actually have a challange by using the kingdom key the whole game but in the second i tried the challange and i didn't die once unlike in the first where i would die a few times per world.

Fantasmic · Post by **Fantasmic** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:05 am

Disneyfreak1990 wrote:the only worlds that were original were Disney Castle, Timeless River, Space Paranoids, and the Colosium since they take place after the film, outside the film's origins, or it never happens and those worlds were still lame except for Space Paranoids.

Timeless River was AMAZING. It's a breathtaking game to begin with, and Timeless River topped it all off. I'm not too big of a gamer, but I understand that technically-speaking it wasn't the best. But you need to think of it as this: Sora finding his place in these stories that we're all so familiar with, and making his was through a much larger, epic tale. This is Disney Magic, in game form. It doesn't get any better than that. Unless the gamer is as cynical as you, and then it's bound to fail.

Disney Magic: Best experienced with a healthy dose of child-like wonder.

Disneyfreak1990 · Post by **Disneyfreak1990** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:28 am

well the worlds did nothing to contribute to the story, whatever it was. in the first game the worlds actually did contribute espesially Neverland, Wonderland, Agrabah, and Deep Jungle. the only one that really contributed was Space Paranoids and i didn't like the film that much. and Timeless River was cool but it was too bad they didn't include it for the revists where an org member was doing something to the cornerstone. but what i don't understand is if the cornerstone keeps heartless out of the world how can they be in Timeless River anyway?

Fantasmic · Post by **Fantasmic** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:30 pm

the villains went back in time and stopped them from placing the cornerstone... thats why it's not there in the past. pete takes it, if i'm not mistaken...

and the worlds did contribute; pete teamed up with barbossa in potc, you chased riku through china (er, "Land of the Dragons"

) in mulan, the organization kidnapped belle in an attempt to turn beast into one of them... the list goes on and on.

Disneyfreak1990 · Post by **Disneyfreak1990** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:08 pm

actually the cornerstone is safe and sound since you rescue it from Pete. and those examples don't have anything to show how the worlds contributed to the plot. the closest are learning Riku is okay by going to Mulan and finding a little about the org's plot in Beast's Castle. but in the first they actually had plot devices like in Wonderland you learn that the princesses are being kidnapped for a reason, in Deep Jungle you learn about how your friends are in your heart(that contributes because if Sora didn't learn that he wouldn't have gotten the keyblade back from Riku), in Agrabah you learn what Male's plot is by kiddnapping the princesses to open the final door, and in Neverland you learn that you have to go to Hollow Bastion to rescue Kairi. that's way more than KH2 and it has more worlds than the original and more gametime.

jeremy88 · Post by **jeremy88** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:20 pm

I love how this thread randomly went off on a tagent to discussing Kingdom Hearts

Maybe someone should search for the Kingdom Hearts thread, I'm sure its lost somewhere in the off-topic forum hehe.

BUT since we're on the nice subject of KH, I think the first one has a cleaner "on topic" story, in KH2 most of the worlds were just episodic and didn't intertwine with the core of the story as much. Atlantica and Agrabah to me were such a let down because they were so awesome in the first one, and they were basically cut down. Plus KH2 was so easy! It's still a good game, but I think the first one is better and more of a challenge.

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:38 am

Disneyfreak1990 wrote:and lets not forget her ditsyness . she just sounds like it in the trailer and she really is in kingdom hearts to the point she trusts Ursula... TWICE. the first time was to give her the trident so Ariel can go to other worlds and the gang plus Ariel kill her but a year later she has no clue who Ursula is and does the movie all over again. how ditsy can one teenage mermaid get?

no,she didn't trust her in the second time,she wanted to go way but she didn't other choice,and she allready knew who Ursula was so she knew what she was doing.
and i think Kingdom Hearts 2 was kinda suck,the new worlds are boring and arn't colorfull as the world in the new one and look what i mean-in Kingdom Hearts you can swim in Monstro,in KH 2 you can't swim in port royal,in any world actully,no swimming,no flying (and that Agrabah Mini games and the Peter Pan summon dosn't count).
the worlds from the first one were bad in the second one (Atlantica and Agrbah were the worse),i was so dissapointed from Atlantica,i"m dening this game,the first one is the best.

wrestling_stat · Post by **wrestling_stat** » Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

Ok, first off this topic is about the upcoming movie called TLM 3 not Kingdom Hearts. Secondly you guys are spoiling the game for us who had not been able to play them yet. I'm halfway through the first game and it is taking me forever because I can only play it when I'm home (I'm in college). So can you guys please start another thread to discuss this. Thanks.

pasito_4 · Post by **pasito_4** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:40 am

This is true?

* Jodi Benson - Ariel
* Pat Carroll - Ursula, The Evil Sea Witch [3]
* Parker Goris - Flounder[4]
* Samuel E. Wright - Sebastian
* Scott Weinger???? - Prince Eric
* Maurice LaMarche - Scuttle
* Kenneth Mars - King Triton (Ariel's father)[citation needed]
* Rene Auberjonois - Chef Louis
* Edie McClurg - Carlotta the Maid
* Ian McKellen[citation needed] - Grimsby the Valet
* Frank Welker - Max the Sheepdog
* Rob Paulsen - Swifty [5][6]
* Sally Field - Athena (Ariel's mother)[7]
* Kari Wahlgren - Alana (one of Ariel's sisters)[8]
* Danny Cooksey -e Urchin[citation needed]
* Tress MacNeille??? - Arista (one of Ariel's sisters)
* Tara Strong - Various voices [9]

From Wikipedia

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:46 am

pasito_4 wrote:This is true?
* Scott Weinger???? - Prince Eric

Scott Weinger is Eric? sweet

i allways he and Aladdin are almost the same.

wrestling_stat · Post by **wrestling_stat** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:53 am

pasito_4 wrote:This is true?

* Jodi Benson - Ariel
* Pat Carroll - Ursula, The Evil Sea Witch [3]
* Parker Goris - Flounder[4]
* Samuel E. Wright - Sebastian
* Scott Weinger???? - Prince Eric
* Maurice LaMarche - Scuttle
* Kenneth Mars - King Triton (Ariel's father)[citation needed]
* Rene Auberjonois - Chef Louis
* Edie McClurg - Carlotta the Maid
* Ian McKellen[citation needed] - Grimsby the Valet
* Frank Welker - Max the Sheepdog
* Rob Paulsen - Swifty [5][6]
* Sally Field - Athena (Ariel's mother)[7]
* Kari Wahlgren - Alana (one of Ariel's sisters)[8]
* Danny Cooksey -e Urchin[citation needed]
* Tress MacNeille??? - Arista (one of Ariel's sisters)
* Tara Strong - Various voices [9]

From Wikipedia

According to imdb.com

Maurice LaMarche ... Scuttle
Jodi Benson ... Ariel
Pat Carroll ... Ursula
Kenneth Mars ... King Triton
Rob Paulsen ... Prince Eric
Samuel E. Wright ... Sebastian
Parker Goris ... Flounder

The Little Merboy · Post by **The Little Merboy** » Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:27 am

Tress MacNeille is an amazing voice actress, I hope she is in TLM3!

Aladdin from Agrabah · Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:32 pm

AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRGH!!!
Not the damn voice cast issue again!!! It drives me crazy!
OK, I believe NOTHING until Disney gives us some official information!
I've had ENOUGH!
Damn it Disney, why's it taking you so long?????????

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

The Little Mermaid III Discussion