Well, its all over, bar the voting. And another good show. Well done Finland - once again a professional and well produced. Apart from the horrible pink woman! (Who was not our Pink Renata, because we all know Renata is delightful!)
Our Tel said it was awful, but I rather liked the French entry. Sadly, the presentation of the song was appalling, but I liked the song. It was different and didn't really sound like any other. I may be going out on a limb, but I think it was my favourite of the competition (sound only).
I liked Hungry's Unsubstantial Blues, but that probably suffered from poor presentation. I also liked Sweden's tribute to glam rock. I actually thought I was Sam Tyler and had awoken in 1973 watching that!
Finland's entry seemed a little odd. Somewhat... depressing? But it warmed on me by the end.
Our Scooch did well, but I was surprised to see the two backing singers. I don't think Scooch will do well I think, but will only come somewhere in the top 5.
The problem is a lot of the songs are somewhat generic - both in format and presentation. Its a song contest, but its also Euro
vision. A noticable casulty of this was Ireland - who despite having a perfectly fine, traditional song looked somewhat dead and static on screen.
I think this year's entries were probably better quality on the whole, and a numbe of the songs would grow on a listener, but I feel last year's had more songs with instant appeal, even if technically they weren't as good.
You can view videos of all the songs here
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/eurovision/ ... ntestants/