On page 3 of this thread, after reading your post, where you told us of the VERY negative review MTR got in your local newspaper...
So... are you gonna do it?I wrote:dvdjunkie, I am ORDERING you to grab that review, stuff it, along with all this week's garbage, down that critic's throat, and hold his head inside the toilet, until he swallows it! Boring indeed! Why doesn't he go chop his toes off? I bet he'll think that's more fun!
To the critic:
HOW THE HELL CAN MEET THE ROBINSONS BE BORING YOU MORON!! GO AND BURY YOURSELF WITH BARBIE IN THE NUTCRACKER!

EDIT: goofystitch, you said that there was nothing that wowed you in particular in MTR. In my case, it was the total opposite.
 I was dazzled!  I had never seen such lovely animation!  Also, bear in mind that I saw the standard 2D version, as we have no 3D theatres in Malta.
 I was dazzled!  I had never seen such lovely animation!  Also, bear in mind that I saw the standard 2D version, as we have no 3D theatres in Malta.Oh well ... I suppose it all boils down to opinion.
Wait a sec ... it's true that Pixar raise the bar with every release. Wouldn't it be fair if we simply say that MTR lives up to Pixar's standards (and beats a lot of the competition by miles)?


 
 





 
  This is the weakest opening I have ever seen for an animated film in my country.  Last year, Over the Hedge, Ice Age, and Cars all claimed the no. 1 spot immediately.  Chicken Little took the no. 2 spot on release on 11th February 2006, being beaten by Munich.
 This is the weakest opening I have ever seen for an animated film in my country.  Last year, Over the Hedge, Ice Age, and Cars all claimed the no. 1 spot immediately.  Chicken Little took the no. 2 spot on release on 11th February 2006, being beaten by Munich. 
 

 
 

