2007 Oscar Nominations Announced; Cars, Pirates 2, and more

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
MadonnasManOne
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2748
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:08 pm

Post by MadonnasManOne »

Congratulations to Disney and Pixar!

I hope both Cars and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest win in all of their catagories! They certainly deserve it.

Now, I'm sure someone will come along, and tell us how Cars doesn't deserve to win, but, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest does, but, that person wouldn't know what they are talking about.
TheSequelOfDisney
Signature Collection
Posts: 5263
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Ohio, United States of America

Post by TheSequelOfDisney »

TM2-Megatron wrote:I wish we would actually see "Lifted" before the awards, though... it's kind of irritating. Obviously somebody's seen it, if it was nominated.
Does "Lifted" premiere to audiences before "Ratatouille"? I mean, it would seem only natural for it to. Doesn't it have something to do with a UFO??
The Divulgations of One Desmond Leica: http://desmondleica.wordpress.com/
User avatar
TM2-Megatron
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1065
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Post by TM2-Megatron »

TheSequelofDisney wrote:
TM2-Megatron wrote:I wish we would actually see "Lifted" before the awards, though... it's kind of irritating. Obviously somebody's seen it, if it was nominated.
Does "Lifted" premiere to audiences before "Ratatouille"? I mean, it would seem only natural for it to. Doesn't it have something to do with a UFO??
It's supposed to, yes. Doesn't change the fact I'd like to see it before it potential wins for Best Short.
User avatar
TM2-Megatron
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1065
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Post by TM2-Megatron »

MadonnasManOne wrote:Now, I'm sure someone will come along, and tell us how Cars doesn't deserve to win, but, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest does, but, that person wouldn't know what they are talking about.
That's totally dependant on what it's competing against... both of which were either terrible or mediocre films. What's with only 3 films being nominated, though? Surely, there were more than 3 animated films made this year?
User avatar
MadonnasManOne
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2748
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:08 pm

Post by MadonnasManOne »

TM2-Megatron wrote: That's totally dependant on what it's competing against... both of which were either terrible or mediocre films. What's with only 3 films being nominated, though? Surely, there were more than 3 animated films made this year?
I'm saying that Cars is not only worthy of the nominations it received, but, it should also win in those catagories. I'm also pulling for Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest to win in the catagories that it is nominated.

Both of these films deserve their nominations, and deserve to win. To me, it doesn't depend on what films they are up against.
User avatar
TM2-Megatron
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1065
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Post by TM2-Megatron »

MadonnasManOne wrote:I'm also pulling for Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest to win in the catagories that it is nominated.

Both of these films deserve their nominations, and deserve to win. To me, it doesn't depend on what films they are up against.
I'll give Pirates 'Best Visual Effects' no arguments... I thought Poseiden's effects were terrible, and Superman Returns had good effects for a few select elements, and the rest was below-average. Whoever wins Art Direction will probably depend most on the personal tastes of the those voting.

But it's rather dififcult for non-professionals to properly judge Pirates merits over the other nominees in its remaining two categories... particularly from nothing to go with but the finished film. I'd need to listen to a lot of the raw pre- and post-edited and mixed sound elements for all the movies to say whether Pirates actually did a better job.
User avatar
RachelSmachel
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:55 am
Location: Australia

Post by RachelSmachel »

TM2-Megatron wrote:I'll give Pirates 'Best Visual Effects' no arguments... I thought Poseiden's effects were terrible, and Superman Returns had good effects for a few select elements, and the rest was below-average.
Davy Jones. That is all that needs to be said :D
User avatar
Anthony
Special Edition
Posts: 946
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: a few steps from the beach

Post by Anthony »

It should also be mentioned that Kevin O'Connell received his 19th nomination for Sound Mixing in Apocalypto. Dude has been nominated in the Sound catergories for working on such classics as Days of Thunder, Top Gun and both Spider-man films. He has NEVER won! 18 previous nominations and nothing! What's it gonna take to get this poor guy an Oscar??
User avatar
AwallaceUNC
Signature Collection
Posts: 9439
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 1:00 am
Contact:

Post by AwallaceUNC »

On the whole, I probably like this year's picks more than last year's. I'm particularly happy that <i>Dreamgirls</i> and <i>The Departed</i> got so many, and especially Jennifer Hudson. Like most others, though, I'm upset that it didn't get a Best Picture nom. I also think it's kind of lame that J-Hud is getting Supporting credit in all these award shows. I felt that she was pretty clearly the lead (if there was one lead at all, that is). And of course -- not that I was expecting it -- but Johnny Depp should have been nominated for Best Actor.
Loomis wrote:Di Caprio's nomination for Blood Diamond rather than The Departed is interesting, although I am yet to see Blood Diamond as the trailers made it look...well...crap. Other reports seem to indicate otherwise.
Exactly the same here.

Timon/Pumbaa fan wrote:
AwallaceUNC wrote:Disney earned 7 nominations.
Actually, it'd be 8 if we included "Lifted"(Pixar's next short), but then again, you'd also have to include Disney's other branches as well. So yeah, 7. :P
If Disney is in fact distributing it, then I think it would count as #8. I'm sure they will be, but I guess it could be something that was lost in the contract negotiations. Do we have confirmation?

-Aaron
• Author of Hocus Pocus in Focus: The Thinking Fan's Guide to Disney's Halloween Classic
and The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom (Epcot coming soon)
• Host of Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Pod, the longest-running Disney podcast
• Entertainment Writer & Moderator at DVDizzy.com
• Twitter - @aaronspod
User avatar
lord-of-sith
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2288
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 7:03 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him/His)

Post by lord-of-sith »

Only a few surprises here (no Dreamgirls nom as the biggest). But what troubles me the most is no DMC nom for costumes or make-up. However, when I think about it, I can see why make-up might not be the best thing for it to be nominated for. When I think of the good make-ups in the film, I then realise that they are CGI creations. But hey, Revenge of the Sith got the make-up nom last year under the same circumstances (it should have gotten VFX nom). Costumes I understand less why, but I'm glad it got the noms it did. I will be very upset if it doesn't win best VFX (Poseidon's were crap and Superman's were spotty).
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

AwallaceUNC wrote:And of course -- not that I was expecting it -- but Johnny Depp should have been nominated for Best Actor.
Johnny Depp was never going to be nominated for Best Actor having already been nominated for the same role. It's sort of an unwritten law that "repeats" aren't nominated. Notice how Ian McKellen was only nominated once for Gandalf etc.

Of course, the Academy messed up that rule by letting Howard Shore win best Musical Score for Fellowship of the Ring and Return of the King (even though the latter score included a lot of the same themes); a blatant example of the Academy voting as a "crowd pleaser" rather than following through with their own tradition.

Ho hum, another Academy Awards round of nominations, and another example of the Academy voting in one of two ways: either for "worthy, you should watch this" films or crowd pleasing titles.

Are you really telling me that out of the hundreds of films released this year, titles like Blood Diamond, Bable and Apocalypto not only happen to be "worthy" but are also variously the best scripted, acted, edited, sound edited and scored. I don't think so. Once again, a selected few titles hog all the credit.

Tough luck if you happen to be the top of your game, but you only happen to edit Micheal Bay films, you'll never be recognised by your peers, even though, arguably, a fast paced action film is harder to edit.

I think, this year is the year I give up on the Oscars.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
akhenaten
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1267
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: kuala lumpur, malaysia
Contact:

Post by akhenaten »

2099net wrote:
I think, this year is the year I give up on the Oscars.
i gave up on the oscars a long time ago.and it has nothing to do with disney winning or losing. oscars r just a bunch of old people wanting to see their friends win, and wanting to set some odd world record like the first black, the first chinese, the first this the first that.and most actresses would get nominated or win because they appear nude which is the hardest thing to do in this world that includes their integrity and characterization.they also like to create records of longest nomination but never win and finally giving the person their due award after a long torture. thats oscar.
do you still wait for me Dream Giver?
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21407
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Post by Sotiris »

Question: I've read somewhere (can't remember where though) that because there were plenty of animated movies released in 2006, there would be 5 movies nominated instead of 3. What happened?

I'm really hoping for "The Little Matchgirl" to win but i think "Lifted" will.

I'm really hoping for "Cars" to win the Best Animated Feature but i think "Happy Feet" is gonna win.

I'm really hoping for "Cars" to win the Best Song but i think one of the "Dreamgirls" song will.

After not giving "Destino" the Oscar for Best Short :angry: I've lost my faith in the Academy...
User avatar
tsom
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1257
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:09 am

Post by tsom »

I'm surprised Dreamgirls didn't get nominated for Best Pictures! It was a shock. Anyway, I hope Marie Antoinette wins Best Costumes. I saw that movie and the costumes were visually appealing. It deserves to win!
Timon/Pumbaa fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3675
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by Timon/Pumbaa fan »

sotiris2006 wrote:Question: I've read somewhere (can't remember where though) that because there were plenty of animated movies released in 2006, there would be 5 movies nominated instead of 3. What happened?
"Arthur and the Invincibles" turned out it had too much live-action for it to be counted, leaving us one short.

Yes, we all know 15 animated movies should be enough for 5 nominations, but it's how life works. :roll:
2099net wrote: Johnny Depp was never going to be nominated for Best Actor having already been nominated for the same role. It's sort of an unwritten law that "repeats" aren't nominated. Notice how Ian McKellen was only nominated once for Gandalf etc.
Well, Al Pacino got nominated twice for the same character in The Godfather trilogy. It was just for different categories(for the first he got the nomination for "Best Supporting Actor", in the second one he got it for "Best Actor").

As much as I agree Depp deserved a second nomination(not to mention, more nominations and Oscars for his work in the past), I'll be okay since "At World's End" is coming. I'm hoping they AT LEAST give Depp an Oscar for "Best Actor" simply because it's the last one of the trilogy, like they did with the horrible Return of the King. If they don't even give Depp a nomination next year, I'll be boycotting from even watching the Oscars for a long time.
Last edited by Timon/Pumbaa fan on Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sotiris
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 21407
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
Gender: Male
Location: Fantasyland

Post by Sotiris »

Timon/Pumbaa fan wrote:"Arthur and the Invincibles" turned out it had too much live-action for it to be counted, leaving us one short.

Yes, we all know 15 animated movies should be enough for 5 nominations, but it's how life works. :roll:
Thanks for the info! So in order to have 5 nominees there must be 16 animated movies released per year, right?
Dottie
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2576
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: The Pie-Hole
Contact:

Post by Dottie »

I'd love to see "Little Match Girl" win the Oscar, and I hope for Marie Antoinette to win best costume. Those dresses were amazing!!
I guess PotC 2 will win best Special Effects, they deserve it.
Image
User avatar
Anthony
Special Edition
Posts: 946
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: a few steps from the beach

Post by Anthony »

and if there's less than 8 animated movies released in the year then the Academy skips the catergory altogether
User avatar
Prince Phillip
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1419
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Baltimore, MD

Post by Prince Phillip »

I can not believe that V for Vendetta did not get a single nomination, but Babel gets nominated in a majority of the important nominations!? Ewwww, it was bad enough that Crash won, but now Babel has a chance at winning!?
Ugh! :roll:
Defy Gravity
Ting Ting
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1426
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:13 am

Post by Ting Ting »

I believe I posted this in the 2007 Golden Globes thread, but it fits here too.

Don't get me wrong, I loved The Devil Wears Prada, and the same goes for Meryl Streep. But I think she is getting way too much credit for this movie. Sure, she did a good job, as she always does. But the character of Miranda Priestly was pretty one-dimensional and probably could have been played by anyone. She did a good job, but I think she's getting more credit than she deserves.

Now how long do I have to sit in time-out for saying that?
Post Reply