Archives - Do we really Need 3 1/2 Years of Old Topics?

Feedback for the site and forum: comments, questions, suggestions welcome.
Post Reply
JamesDFarrow
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:01 am

Archives - Do we really Need 3 1/2 Years of Old Topics?

Post by JamesDFarrow »

I have noticed the recent (ongoing) discussion of bandwith. Lack of, costly, etc...

Do all the really old topics have an effect on this?

Sorry for being technically uninformed on this but was thinking that if it does, do we really need to keep topics going back 3 1/2 years (April 2003)?

Probably most of what, especially in the "Off Topic" section, is, say older than 2 years, has to be of little use. I can't see very many people searching, or going back, to stuff that old. If there is something back there that may interest people, they are going to ask again anyway as they will figure the replies from back then are probably not relevant anymore or the info has changed.

So why not just delete the really old, no longer valid or obsolete stuff to free up space.

Just a suggestion.

James :)
James D. Farrow
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
castleinthesky
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1626
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 12:21 pm
Location: Laputa

Post by castleinthesky »

Yes, all former information is important. Members should search for past topics. You don't know how many times I've seen lists of the same thing appearing. If some members would just search, the bandwith would not have to worry. Some members, like myself, like to go back and look at older threads. We like to read, sometimes reviews of DVDs, and other information that can be found. I am all in favor for keeping older topics.
Best Movies of 2009:
1. Moon
2. Inglorious Basterds
3. The Hurt Locker
4. Coraline
5. Ponyo
Ktrek
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:45 am
Contact:

Post by Ktrek »

I think it's important to keep all information and posts. Sometimes it's cool to see older threads brought back to the surface. However, if there is one thing I know about bandwidth it is that search functions use more bandwidth than almost any other feature. That's why most free boards actually turn off the onboard search features and opt for a Google type script to replace them. So, if administrators are concerned about bandwidth that's the place to really look.

Kevin
Mr. Toad
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4360
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: Victoria, BC
Contact:

Post by Mr. Toad »

Old posts dont take up bandwith, new ones do. All the old posts take up storage not bandwith. And if Luke has enough he should keep them.

I know Luke has done a couple of cleanup projects over the year especially in Polls and Games.
Disneyland Trips - 07/77, 07/80, 07/83, 05/92, 05/96, 05/97, 06/00, 11/00, 02/02, 06/02, 11/02, 04/06, 01/07, 07/07, 11/07,11/08, 07/09

Disneyworld Trips - 01/05

Disney Cruise - 01/05

Six Flags DK - 03/09, 05/09. 06/09, 07/09
PixarFan2006
Signature Collection
Posts: 6166
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:44 am
Location: Michigan

Post by PixarFan2006 »

There are some topics that are in need of replying. Pretty soon, a lot of the topics will be forgotten if they are not kept up. So it is not a good idea to delete old topics unless it's really necessary.
User avatar
MickeyMouseboy
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3470
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:35 pm
Location: ToonTown

Post by MickeyMouseboy »

hey that's our history! the great posts were written 3 1/2 years ago! it great to see how we have evolved as UDers! :D ::does the UD secret wave::
User avatar
blackcauldron85
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16691
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:54 am
Gender: Female
Contact:

Post by blackcauldron85 »

I think that if there's enough storage/bandwith for the older posts/threads, then they should stay. I often go into the archives of the animation sites I go on, to refresh my memory or to relive the good old days.
Post Reply