WARNING! The Rescuers Thread: Beware!

Any topic that doesn't fit elsewhere.
Tangela

WARNING! The Rescuers Thread: Beware!

Post by Tangela »

This thread is to discuss an Einster Era Disney Lie. Since I don't believe a word the Disney Company says.

I'm not sure if its really a lie, but I wouldn't trust them. The lie is "The Images were included in original 1977 theatrical release" You know the Rescuers 1999 release video recall and then reissue thingie. They spect me to believe that the original team of Disney's animators would do this, uh huh, :roll: Yeah right! And also "The images were not included in the 1992 version because it was made from a different print." Sure!

Anything they say is to defend themselves and keep their money. Has anyone proved that the images were there in the 1977 version? With all that record of liers. M. Einster would do anything for money or to gain respect, well, from my side, he's lost all the respect, I feel sick everytime I see his stupid face. I believe that the two images were placed into the film just before the 1999 release, besides it seems very interesting that it was them who discovered the frames, I mean you really have to know they're there to see them, I don't think they just decided to view the film frame-by-frame...
:x
What do you guys think? Am I confusing anybody?
;)
Last edited by Tangela on Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

You're confusing me.

What's lye got to do with it?

Image

:?
Tangela

Post by Tangela »

I knew I was a bit confusing. Well, I think the lie is that the two inappropiate images were inserted into the film before the 1999 release but not in the 1977 version. I mean if you look at the facts it is just too obvious:

The Images were in the 1999 release but not in the 1992 one.

They were discovered buy the modern company, you really have to know they were there to find them, I think they knew.

No one has ever proved that the images were in the original theatrical release.

So, my guess is that someone in the modern times Disney Company did it, not some jealous post-producer back in 1977.

Do you understand now Luke? What my point is...
;)
Last edited by Tangela on Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
catNC
Special Edition
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 8:04 pm
Contact:

Post by catNC »

the lye will be used to make soap to "clean" up the inappropriate images in the newer home video release??

we made lye soap in chemistry class in high school, and it blew up in my face.. and that's no LIE :lol:
Image
Tangela

Post by Tangela »

Alright! How the heck do you spell "not the truth"?

:(
RoyalNatalie

Post by RoyalNatalie »

To 'lie.' :roll:
STASHONE
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 5:32 pm

Post by STASHONE »

damn that Einster!
User avatar
Loomis
Signature Collection
Posts: 6357
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
Contact:

Post by Loomis »

Luke wrote:You're confusing me.

What's lye got to do with it?

:?
Wasn't that a Tina Turner song?
Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
User avatar
indianajdp
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1813
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 7:10 pm
Location: Central Hoosierland

Post by indianajdp »

What the ..... :?

Is it February already?




:wink: :D
" There's no Dumbass Vaccine " - Jimmy Buffett
Tangela

Post by Tangela »

Ant I guess this marks the end of the discussion since the main point was totally lost...

:( :( :(
Maerj
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2748
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 11:31 pm
Location: Ephrata, PA
Contact:

Post by Maerj »

Feel free to smoke if ya got em! This thread has been dooby-rific!
User avatar
FOXSTAR
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 9:14 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Lost Point

Post by FOXSTAR »

Tangela wrote:Ant I guess this marks the end of the discussion since the main point was totally lost...

:( :( :(

Will did you look in the lost and found :scratch:




Foxstar 8)
Member of The Big Cartoon DataBase!
Member Of Sonic FanClub!
Maerj
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2748
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 11:31 pm
Location: Ephrata, PA
Contact:

Re: WARNING! The Rescuers Thread: Beware!

Post by Maerj »

Tangela the Jellyroll wrote:This thread is to discuss an Einster Era Disney Lye. Since I don't believe a word the Disney Company says.

I'm not sure if its reelly a lye, but I wouldn't trust them. The lye is "The Images were included in original 1977 theatrical release" You know the Rescuers 1999 release video recall and then reissue thingie. They spect me to believe that the original team of Disney's animators would do this, uh huh, :roll: Yeah right! And also "The images were not included in the 1992 version because it was made from a different print." Sure! And I own my own golf course!

Anything they say is to defend themselves and keep their money. Has anyone proved that the images were there in the 1977 version? With all that record of lyers. M. Einster would do anything for money or to gain respect, well, from my side, he's lost all the respect, I feel sick everytime I see his stupid face. I believe that the two images were placed into the film just before the 1999 release, besides it seems very interesting that it was them who discovered the frames, I mean you really have to know they're there to see them, I don't think they just decided to view the film frame-by-frame like I have. I watch it over and over, frame by glorious frame.
:x
What do you guys think? Am I smoking pot or just weird? Am I the real lyer?
;)
Why don't we have good, intelligent discussions like this anymore? Why?
User avatar
Joe Carioca
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2039
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:05 pm
Location: Brazil

Post by Joe Carioca »

Hey, Tangela... Disney is politically-correct... But that doesn't mean that all the artists within the corporation are. ;)
Uncle Remus
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 6:24 am
Location: In the South.

Post by Uncle Remus »

why does everyone keep complaining about the naughty frame in the rescuers? it is sorta a pointless topic to talk about over and over and over and over and......(20 minutes later)......over and over and over again. just face it. disney is never going to bring back the original rescuers that wasnt edited. so there is no use for this topic anymore.
Maerj
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2748
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 11:31 pm
Location: Ephrata, PA
Contact:

Post by Maerj »

THAT'S what this thread was about? Oh okay, it was hard to tell. Nevermind then, everyone just move to the next unread post. Sorry for the inconvenience!
Tangela

Re: WARNING! The Rescuers Thread: Beware!

Post by Tangela »

Maerj wrote:
Tangela the Jellyroll wrote:This thread is to discuss an Einster Era Disney Lye. Since I don't believe a word the Disney Company says.

I'm not sure if its reelly a lye, but I wouldn't trust them. The lye is "The Images were included in original 1977 theatrical release" You know the Rescuers 1999 release video recall and then reissue thingie. They spect me to believe that the original team of Disney's animators would do this, uh huh, :roll: Yeah right! And also "The images were not included in the 1992 version because it was made from a different print." Sure! And I own my own golf course!

Anything they say is to defend themselves and keep their money. Has anyone proved that the images were there in the 1977 version? With all that record of lyers. M. Einster would do anything for money or to gain respect, well, from my side, he's lost all the respect, I feel sick everytime I see his stupid face. I believe that the two images were placed into the film just before the 1999 release, besides it seems very interesting that it was them who discovered the frames, I mean you really have to know they're there to see them, I don't think they just decided to view the film frame-by-frame like I have. I watch it over and over, frame by glorious frame.
:x
What do you guys think? Am I smoking pot or just weird? Am I the real lyer?
;)
Why don't we have good, intelligent discussions like this anymore? Why?
Ok! I am so sick of this idiot, I'm sorry but this time I'm leaving and I'm leaving for good!!! I can't stand any more jokes from that stupid Maerj. Goodbye!!!! You really got me angry this time, "Terry"!!!!!!

:x :x :x :x :x :x :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :x :x :x :x :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
:x :x :x :x :x :x :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :x :x :x :x :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
:x :x :x :x :x :x :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :x :x :x :x :x :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

Stop! Don't! Come back!

Surely someone who's brought so much humor to this forum as you, Tangela, should be able to recognize when someone is kidding.

You're angry, and anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. Nonetheless, there's no need to dish out names like "stupid" and "idiot" at other members. Thanks.
Maerj
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2748
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 11:31 pm
Location: Ephrata, PA
Contact:

Post by Maerj »

LOL, you should see the PM I just got, there is worse language than that in it! But at least it was well written! Thanks! :D
Tangela

Post by Tangela »

Maerj wrote:LOL, you should see the PM I just got, there is worse language than that in it! But at least it was well written! Thanks! :D
Well, you did get me really mad, you know!!!! So I couldn't help myself from writting those things to you, I told you a million times I don't like those jokes, even if you and Luke think they're funny. Then I mean to take the PM back but you had already seen it. So, I didn't mean those things, but at the same time, I did mean that you got me really upset.

:x
Post Reply