dvdjunkie wrote:TM2-Megatron has some very good points, but I wish he would put them in an English we can all understand. Why would anyone care about the input or output of a computer (a laptop one, at that). I would never watch a movie on a computer for any reason.
Maybe it is just me, but Techno-babble just doesn't register with me. I own a 1080i HDTV monitor and a Samsung Blu-Ray Disc Player and I have yet to see anything that matches that quality - or sound. And you can't tell me that a computer can give you 6.1 Dolby Digital through 13 speakers.
If your HDTV is an LCD, are you sure it actually has a native resolution of 1080? Usually, manufacturers fudge the difference and say their TVs are 1080i-capable, despite only having a native resolution of 1366x768. Those TVs are able to accept a signal coming in at 1080i, but they shrink the image to fit their reduced pixels (probably the biggest weakness of LCD technology, as this process always results in an extremely noticeable drop in quality). IMO, it's this quality that renders probably 90% of the "HDTVs" on the market today completely useless beyond maybe 5 years; which is a pretty pathetic useful life for a television, particularly considering ones that cost so damn much, and the fact that LCD panels are supposed to last quite a long time before burning out. When 720p is removed from the HD standard (and it will be, I'm quite sure), none of these televisions will even be considered HD anymore.
Also, what's with the bias against computers? Personally, I'm moving to the point where I hope to just own a single display (or two, for a dual-monitor computer setup) that can be used as both computer display and television. This would require a rather large screen, of course, to make an appropriate full-time television. The only reason I'm still waiting is that there isn't a single consumer LCD display I know of capable of the resolutions I prefer my computer to occupy. One of the current HDTVs would essentially throw me back to the 1024x768 days, and I haven't used a computer at that resolution for 5 or 6 years.
Computer monitors have always had more capabilities than their television contemporaries, except for the fact they're usually a bit smaller. I'd certainly watch a Blu-Ray movie on my 24" Dell LCD before I'd play it on a regular HDTV; at least the computer monitor is truly capable of displaying 1920x1080 pixels without screwing around with its sizing.
And I don't know about most computers, but the sound card in mine is capable of supporting 5.1, 6.1 or 7.1 channels using Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital EX, DTS Digital Surround, DTS-ES, and Neo:6. You won't find many receivers for a television set-up able to decode all those standards in one unit.