He really is.darth_deetoo wrote:Wow! I can't believe what a rude, nasty, irritating, and downright unpleasant individual you are.rodis wrote: If you had used your brain, you would have realized I was being sarcastic as to how bright and too pastel like the colors had turned. Gee.
Here you have the official site for the soundtrack:darth_deetoo wrote:I've looked around on a few sites and all I can find is the original single disc soundtrack. Does anyone have a track listing for the bonus disc?
Just because some people don't understand sarcasm doesn't mean he's unpleasant.MerXAN wrote: He really is.
You always think you're so clever, rodis. Be nice.
quote]
What we get to see is the theatrical aspect ratio, the way the directors WANTED it to be seen!!!! 
Couldn't have said it any better! I'm reading the reviews and the sometimes petty complaints make me laugh because I know everyone is now going to get mad that the transfer is apparantly subpar while in reality as soon as we watch the DVD ourselves, most of us will forget of all the flaws mentioned in those reviews. So come down everybody, I'm currently relying on the dozens of pictures that we've been served with and the video quality looks impressive so far.Dottie wrote:Guys!!! Y'all should calm down!!!
And honestly how many of us have such great tvs that they really realize if the transfer is pretty amazing, or just like normal. I, and I guess, like many of the others here own a normal fullscrenn tv, and I really can't see the differences between a good restoration and a not so good restoration. I enjoy the movie and I don't wanna be sitting there all the time thinking:" Oh, look there's some grain, now there isn't..."
Just wait till everyone of us has a copy and then let's decide,ok?
I doubt many of us will see grain, or no grain, or have a large enough screen to recognize it.
Good positive thinking!Dottie wrote: I enjoy the movie and I don't wanna be sitting there all the time thinking:" Oh, look there's some grain, now there isn't..."
Just wait till everyone of us has a copy and then let's decide,ok?
I doubt many of us will see grain, or no grain, or have a large enough screen to recognize it.
Well I definitely remembered a few seconds of graininess when I saw this last month at El Capitan. The graininess was towards the beginning of the film and I don't think it was done for atmosphere (in other words - it was degradation that had not been corrected) but it was momentary and the rest of the film, I don't recall seeing it, but by then I was fully engrossed in the film so I might not have noticed it. And as Dottie mentioned, we'll ALL be watching this on a fraction of the size of that screen. How noticeable could the flaws be on our much smaller TV sets? (I know this is not making anyone feel better, esp. after having read a few pages of the Cinderella restoration thread, but hey, I thought I would try!)Disneykid wrote:I'm shocked to hear that this isn't a Lowry restoration. That explains why the screencaps look a tad softer than other Disney restorations. The reviewer's comments against Lowry annoy me, though. Film grain in films is sometimes intentional to give off a certain look, usually in film noir. Disney films, on the other hand, do not use grain as a means of expressing a visual style. You're not supposed to be seeing it.
