Cheers,
JM
If you read my earlier posts, we went to see "Cars" at the theater for the eighth time and when we came out of the theater there was a guy in the parking lot with a trunkload of 'new releases' on DVD. He said they were all "film-chain" recorded and would be far and above anything we could get on-line. Since I don't ever buy anything on-line and I only wanted "Cars", I plunked down the money - $25 - and took the product home, expecting a below average copy. What I got was a pristine 'film-chain' copy complete with a Dolby 5.1 soundtrack and I was blown away. No extra special features, just "One Man Band". It will do until November 7th.Didn't know there were bootlegs out - I assume these are people who are recording off the bit torrent sites, packaging them and selling them on Ebay - which is a pretty dangerous occupation.
I was in Best Buy one day and they made me an offer that I couldn't refuse. Buy the new Blu-Ray for $859, get five free movies of my choice, and they would deliver it to my home by the end of the week. I had already had an HD-DVD player and it was more trouble than it was worth, so I said why not. I will tell you, if you have a good Hi-Def Monitor, your current DVD's will look like Hi-Def DVD's, no question. And the sound will blow you out of your house. Even my cheesy 'bootleg' copy of "Cars" looks amazing played through this system. I only have two titles in actual Blu-Ray - "Hitch", and "RV" - and they are very good. The Blu-Ray technology I am sure will soon catch up to the already burgeoning HD-DVD, and then the fight will be on. I don't care which side wins, Blu-Ray is backwards compatible so I will never have to worry about having a DVD player to play my 3000+ DVD's on.I know this is off-topic, but wow, DVDjunkie so you jumped right in with a purchase of a Blu-Ray player? So what is coming out in that format that you can play on that? Have you been able to purchase any movies made for BluRay? How's the quality of that when you view non-HD quality DVDs on there?
Wow, that is incredible that a guy is that brazen to be selling pirated DVDs out of his trunk, on site at a movie house! Unbelievable. I don't know that I would have chanced buying one, but it sounds like he turned out to "stand by his product" eh?dvdjunkie wrote: there was a guy in the parking lot with a trunkload of 'new releases' on DVD. He said they were all "film-chain" recorded and would be far and above anything we could get on-line. Since I don't ever buy anything on-line and I only wanted "Cars", I plunked down the money - $25
What kind was this that doesn't work so good so I can tell my husband (so we won't buy it). Is it the brand or technology that's not working, I wonder?dvdjunkie wrote:I had already had an HD-DVD player and it was more trouble than it was worth...
This is all good stuff to know. Thanks!dvdjunkie wrote:I will tell you, if you have a good Hi-Def Monitor, your current DVD's will look like Hi-Def DVD's, no question. And the sound will blow you out of your house. Even my cheesy 'bootleg' copy of "Cars" looks amazing played through this system..... I don't care which side wins, Blu-Ray is backwards compatible so I will never have to worry about having a DVD player to play my 3000+ DVD's on.

Pluto Region 1 wrote:I had already had an HD-DVD player and it was more trouble than it was worth...
It was a Toshiba......and it would stop for no reason in the middle of movies, and on dual layer discs it would freeze up between layers, and you would have to start over again because it wouldn't read past where it stopped. They are saying that they have fixed that problem, but now that I have a Blu-Ray, I am not interested.What kind was this that doesn't work so good so I can tell my husband (so we won't buy it). Is it the brand or technology that's not working, I wonder?
Like Luke said, I think chances of that happening are non-existant. Disney(and Pixar) have had many lawsuits and complaints in the past, and a lot of them didn't make any change.magicalwands wrote:Now I still stand by the petition, but remember what we could really lose here. I would much rather have a 1-disc now and a 2-disc later that both include the scene the train organization wants to cut, than only a 2-disc release with the scene deleted.
The outcry about the Cars single-disc edition is mostly because Pixar usually does a superb job with their DVDs. Their last three movies have been 2-disc sets right away, and the other three have received great editions as well. The merger should not be an excuse for a DVD release below Pixar's usual standards.Timon/Pumbaa fan wrote:I think all Junkie was saying was that if you really do love this movie so much, the petition seems rather silly. I agree to an extent. Frankly, I'll say it again, I don't see why people are making a big deal out of this release. It's not like it's the first time Disney's(or any company) has ever released a single disc DVD of a popular movie and then latter release a double-dip. I mean, we still haven't gotten Lilo and Stitch, and no one has complained about this(or any) "bad" release like they've had with Cars.
Well, I was a little disappointed by the Finding Nemo DVD, (and not just because of the filmBrandonH wrote: The outcry about the Cars single-disc edition is mostly because Pixar usually does a superb job with their DVDs. Their last three movies have been 2-disc sets right away, and the other three have received great editions as well. The merger should not be an excuse for a DVD release below Pixar's usual standards.
I think people would be depressed to hear Disney is doing 3d animation. Plus, Cars has a whole backstory with Route 66. All Chicken Little can talk about is the folk tale it came from and I bet Disney would gather people up to tell how differently they each heard the story.2099net wrote:I know people scoff at Chicken Little, but a 2 disc release of Chicken Little had the potential to be much more interesting and informative than a 2 disc Cars being as it would document the beginning of CGI at Disney.
I don't think Disney has anything new to talk about the process of making a 2d film either. And if they talked about the 3d process, it would be repeating everything Pixar talked about in their dvds.2099net wrote:Like the old "How we make a Cartoon", "Production Progression Multi-Angle" and "Art of Storyboarding" featurettes on most traditional Disney 2 disc DVDs, There's not really much Pixar can put on their discs about the physical production process that would be new.
Pixar films are just as important as any other Disney film, and vice versa. To say only a few one disc films of Disney are better than Pixar's dvds combined is unfair. Pixar puts just as much heart into their films as Disney. It's stupid you're attacking Pixar just because Finding Nemo got a 2-Disc in 2003/04 and Disney only started doing one discs for their Special Editions last year.2099net wrote:So, yes - when Disney stopped releasing 2 discs sets with their single disc sets (like they used to with Tarzan, Dinosaur, The Emperor's New Groove and the wonderful Atlantis) I think we did loose something just as important, if not more important, than Pixar's 2 disc sets.

No they wouldn't. Because they would be talking about people making their first 3D film. How they had to change from doing traditional animation to computer animation. What they had to learn, what they thought they could carry over.I don't think Disney has anything new to talk about the process of making a 2d film either. And if they talked about the 3d process, it would be repeating everything Pixar talked about in their dvds.
What does this mean, and when did I say it?To say only a few one disc films of Disney are better than Pixar's dvds combined is unfair.
No, I think Cars deserves a 2-disc. It's sort of like Pocahontas-Lion King. Cars is Pocahontas, while, The Incredibles is Lion King. People didn't like Cars or Pocahontas much because it taught a lesson, which I think is lame because both movies are good. But I was a little Pixar overboard in that post.2099net wrote:Am I bashing Pixar, or are you putting Pixar on a pedestal?
I don't think it's a good idea to make it though, not because it won't be good, but because people are angry enough Disney threw away 2d animation.No they wouldn't. Because they would be talking about people making their first 3D film. How they had to change from doing traditional animation to computer animation. What they had to learn, what they thought they could carry over.
"I think we did loose something just as important, if not more important, than Pixar's 2 disc sets." I don't think it's fair to say Disney films deserve 2-discs while Pixar films don't. That's what I meant.2099net wrote:What does this mean, and when did I say it?To say only a few one disc films of Disney are better than Pixar's dvds combined is unfair.



What--what--WHAT?? "Also available in an Exclusive 2-disc Set"?!?MadonnasManOne wrote:I just came across this on EzyDVD.com.
http://www.ezydvd.com.au/item.zml/788498
Damn you beat me to it! I just posted news about this in international DVD. Yes Australia, and only EzyDVD Australia, will be getting a 2 disc set. It looks to have features that the American version doesn't have. I guess this means a 2 disc set will come out in region 1 at some point later?PixarFan wrote:What--what--WHAT?? "Also available in an Exclusive 2-disc Set"?!?MadonnasManOne wrote:I just came across this on EzyDVD.com.
http://www.ezydvd.com.au/item.zml/788498![]()
At first I thought the tin would be cool...but now I couldn't care less about the tin as long as US gets that second disc!!