MadonnasManOne wrote:Great review of The Shaggy Dog, Luke. It's a tad bit hard to read when some of the words appear in the darker fur. Anyway, I haven't seen this film, but, I might have to give it a rental. That's crazy about how much picture you actually lose with the widescreen presentation!
Well, I don't think Luke choose a good example (or alternatively he did choose a good example, because the cropped shot was poor) but if you look at his other screenshots, such as

or

its clear that the STORYTELLING is improved by the cropping.
In the first example, Tim Allen is clearly the subject of the image, with Spencer Breslin's reaction neatly framed in the background. Also, by reading left-to-right (as we tend to process visual information visually because of reading words) Breslin's reaction may be smaller than Allen's but is somewhat emphasised by its position.
In th second example, the Wife is again, the focus of the shot, and on the left, while her children and the dog are framed in the background neatly. Imagine that shot open matte, there would be far to much headroom above the children, and their presence would be reduced as the brain would spends some time deciding where to focus.
This isn't so say widescreen is the only viable storytelling format, but the film was clearly framed for widescreen presentation. (Deathie would be proud of me!)