Exactly, and the Miyazaki films are chalk-full of sophisticated ideas.2099net wrote:Who cares if its 24 frames or not? It's not important. It's the ideas which are important.

Exactly, and the Miyazaki films are chalk-full of sophisticated ideas.2099net wrote:Who cares if its 24 frames or not? It's not important. It's the ideas which are important.
If all you care about is how many images they use per second, then you're pretty shallow. The quality of the animation has little to do with how many drawings are used.MichaeLeah wrote:I agree with dvdjunkie. Honestly, I don't mean any disrespect, I don't understand how fans of Disney animation can like Japanese anime. The animation doesn't even compare. Japanese anime is about as animated as the books they used to read on Reading Rainbow. They don't use 24 pictures per second like Disney. (I think I have that right.)
Anyway, I just won't buy the Japanese anime. The United States has always created much better animation than Japan.
I think this is how stop-motion studios (such as Aardman) shoot their material, i.e. 12 or 8 different poses/shots for every second of film, but projected to run at 24 fps. As far as I know, no one accuses Wallace and Gromit of looking cheap and/or uninspired.Lord Yupa wrote:Anyway, as a student of animation, this is what I can tell you:
DIsney films are done on 1s (24 drawings per second) much of the time because they use rotoscope, which is tracing over live-action footage frame-by-frame. Hand-drawn animated films from Studio Ghibli (which never use rotoscope), in comparison, are done on 2s (12 drawings per second at 24 frames per second), 3s (8 drawings per second at 24 frames per second), and even occasionally 4s (6 drawings per second at 24 frames per second), going to the 1s only during action scenes or scenes with really subtle and detailed movement because that's their style, and each different motion rate has its own unique and wonderful feel. It's a more abstract, impressionistic approach to movement compared to the realism of Disney, Don Bluth, or Ralph Bakshi, and is extremely similar to the work of the Fleischer Bros., Warner Bros., and UPA in their stylization of the medium.
Exactly. Maybe that's one reason why Nick Park holds Miyazaki in such high regardKarushifa wrote:I think this is how stop-motion studios (such as Aardman) shoot their material, i.e. 12 or 8 different poses/shots for every second of film, but projected to run at 24 fps. As far as I know, no one accuses Wallace and Gromit of looking cheap and/or uninspired.Lord Yupa wrote:Anyway, as a student of animation, this is what I can tell you:
DIsney films are done on 1s (24 drawings per second) much of the time because they use rotoscope, which is tracing over live-action footage frame-by-frame. Hand-drawn animated films from Studio Ghibli (which never use rotoscope), in comparison, are done on 2s (12 drawings per second at 24 frames per second), 3s (8 drawings per second at 24 frames per second), and even occasionally 4s (6 drawings per second at 24 frames per second), going to the 1s only during action scenes or scenes with really subtle and detailed movement because that's their style, and each different motion rate has its own unique and wonderful feel. It's a more abstract, impressionistic approach to movement compared to the realism of Disney, Don Bluth, or Ralph Bakshi, and is extremely similar to the work of the Fleischer Bros., Warner Bros., and UPA in their stylization of the medium.
We're not really taking as such an insult as much as trying to say that while Disney may have been a pioneer in animation (after all, Walt produced the very first feature-length animated film), it is far from being Disney's exclusive baby any more and many other studios have taken what Disney started and gone their own direction with it.MichaeLeah wrote:Hey Guys,
Calm down. I didn't mean that much by saying Disney uses 24 frames/second. I am just very fond of Disney animation. I think of animation as an art that only Disney perfected. In my mind all other animation will always be inferior to Disney animation. Please don't take it personal. I have just never liked Japanese animation and I only ever watch Disney animation. Maybe this has more with taste and preference and lacks an educated perspective. But I think animation is Disney's art. I think that nobody else will ever be able to compare to Disney animation.
Don't take it as such an insult toward anime. Try taking it as a complement toward Disney animation. Whatever you do, don't forget the gigantic contribution Disney has made toward animation.
I agree on Pom Poko, and this is likely due to the fact that it can be really obtuse at times unless you are either Japanese or very savvy with Japanese culture and folklore. It's probably the least accessible to American audiences (a lot of whom probably did a spit-take when they saw the tanukis' testicles...how do you explain something like that?). It also bothered me how they referred to the protagonists as "raccoons" in the English dub, when technically they aren't, at least in the sense of raccoons indigenous to America.Bill W wrote:I have really enjoyed all of the Studio Ghibli movies. I personally think Pom Poko is the weakest of the lot. All of the others are excellent.
I'm wondering how many people catch the joke in Whisper of the Heart about Mr. Nishi's friends? After they played Country Roads, Mr. Nishi introduced his friends as Mr. Kita and Mr. Minami. In Japanese, Nishi means West, Kita is North, and Minami is South. I thought it was pretty funny!
I have a sincere question for you. What anime have you seen? Have you only seen t.v. shows like Pokemon? Or have you actually seen some of the best from Studio Ghibli, Otomo, and others?MichaeLeah wrote:Hey Guys,
Calm down. I didn't mean that much by saying Disney uses 24 frames/second. I am just very fond of Disney animation. I think of animation as an art that only Disney perfected. In my mind all other animation will always be inferior to Disney animation. Please don't take it personal. I have just never liked Japanese animation and I only ever watch Disney animation. Maybe this has more with taste and preference and lacks an educated perspective. But I think animation is Disney's art. I think that nobody else will ever be able to compare to Disney animation.
Don't take it as such an insult toward anime. Try taking it as a complement toward Disney animation. Whatever you do, don't forget the gigantic contribution Disney has made toward animation.
Well, mostly I think it is not quite as accessible for Western audiences as other Ghibli films, and that can really affect how much a viewer gets out of it. Not having grown up with Japanese folktales and traditions, I kept feeling as if the film really wasn't for me, even though I knew about a lot of the various cultural aspects of the film.castleinthesky wrote:I actually would have to disagree with you both and say Pom Poko is one of the stronger Ghibli films.
Personally I find My Neighbor the Yamadas and The Cat Returns to be the weakest.
That is a good question. I intend for this to be my last post on the subject. I happen to dislike anime but I don't have anything against anybody who happens to like anime. The purpose of the threat I though was to share what you thought about those movies so I shared what I thought. I didn't intend for anyone to take such a personal reaction. And by the way, I know better than to say all Japanese animation is created equal. I can choose not like any of it and still think that some of it is better than other anime.castleinthesky wrote:
I have a sincere question for you. What anime have you seen? Have you only seen t.v. shows like Pokemon? Or have you actually seen some of the best from Studio Ghibli, Otomo, and others?
That's like me saying that Disney is the worst ever because look at American Dragon Jake Long or the Rugrats. Those are terribly animated, so Disney must be terrible too.
I actually don't even like the term "anime". It is just animination from Japan. It can be 2-d or fully CGI. It is no different than stuff from the US and Britain that is 2-d or CGI.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I won't argue with you. I agree that My Neighbors the Yamadas and The Cat Returns are of the weaker Ghibli films, but still better than most (other recent animation, i.e. Atlantis). Yamadas is weak in the sense of the rough animation and episodic nature, but its honest and realistic protrayal of family life really hits home for me.castleinthesky wrote:I actually would have to disagree with you both and say Pom Poko is one of the stronger Ghibli films.
Personally I find My Neighbor the Yamadas and The Cat Returns to be the weakest.
Good call, The Cat Returns is a great Ghibli film!brownie wrote:I actually liked The Cat Returns a lot.