Trailer for Fox and the Hound 2! more midquel madness...
- IggieKuzco
- Special Edition
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:04 am
- Location: Wonderland
- Contact:
Trailer for Fox and the Hound 2! more midquel madness...
55 days 'till Jack is back
They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head. - Blackadder the Third
They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head. - Blackadder the Third
-
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5263
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:30 pm
- Location: Ohio, United States of America
I didn't know that tF&tH 2 was a midquel. I thought that it was a squel. I'm serious too. Disney sure is having a fun time making midquels. What is this, the third or fourth?
The Divulgations of One Desmond Leica: http://desmondleica.wordpress.com/
-
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 8:35 pm
- Location: Sugar Land, TX
- Contact:
- lord-of-sith
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2288
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 7:03 pm
- Gender: Male (He/Him/His)
-
- Special Edition
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:10 pm
It really seems boring, but there are two new characters that seem interesting; that dog voiced by Patrick Swayze and that other pretty ....umm...err...bitch!he, he! You know that one with Ariel's hair on her head! And, talking about Ariel, I too hope that TLM3 is a midquel or a prequel BUT I would hate too see a whole movie with an 8-year-old Ariel. I WANT MY GOOD OLD TEENAGE ARIEL BACK!!!!
- Loomis
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
- Contact:
Let me get this straight...
1) Death to 3D. Bring back 2D
AND
2) Death to the 2D sequels.
C'mon folks, let's make up our minds. This actually looks quite fun, but it is hard to tell from a minute of new footage.
Besides - PATRICK SWAYZE!!! How can it be wrong when it feels so right?
1) Death to 3D. Bring back 2D
AND
2) Death to the 2D sequels.
C'mon folks, let's make up our minds. This actually looks quite fun, but it is hard to tell from a minute of new footage.
Besides - PATRICK SWAYZE!!! How can it be wrong when it feels so right?
Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
-
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3675
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm
Here here!Loomis wrote: C'mon folks, let's make up our minds. This actually looks quite fun, but it is hard to tell from a minute of new footage.
I actually think it looks better than the original!
For some reason, if they DO make a Little Mermaid prequel, I bet EVERYONE will be saying bad things about it before it happens. It just works like that.
Disney is evil, Pixar are Gods!
- IggieKuzco
- Special Edition
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:04 am
- Location: Wonderland
- Contact:
slight exaggeration?Timon/Pumbaa fan wrote: I actually think it looks better than the original!
it doesnt seem all as bad as everyone seems to think, but it also doesnt look as though it keeps in tone with the original film at all, which is very important for a sequel and especially a midquel.
it looks more like an oliver and company spinoff then anything else, but we can only wait and see.
55 days 'till Jack is back
They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head. - Blackadder the Third
They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head. - Blackadder the Third
-
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3675
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm
Well, I think people are forgetting that "The Fox and the Hound" isn't one of Disney's most magical classic. I mean I could understand if it was something like Snow White or Pinocchio(though, I can't understand what's with this request TLM prequelIggieKuzco wrote: slight exaggeration?
it doesnt seem all as bad as everyone seems to think, but it also doesnt look as though it keeps in tone with the original film at all, which is very important for a sequel and especially a midquel.
it looks more like an oliver and company spinoff then anything else, but we can only wait and see.

Now will I buy it? Probably not. In all honesty, I only own 2 DTV's(The Lion King ones

Didn't we get rave reviews for "Bambi 2" recently?
This is the same trailer that was on the Bambi II DVD.
<a href="http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/" target="_blank">Got a question? Ask Google first.</a>
Is it just me...or does the animation look a little jerky for even a DTV, as if they decided not hire as many inbetweeners as usual. I mean, I noticed some strobe when the characters moved. Maybe it's just me, though.
<img src="http://img123.imageshack.us/my.php?imag ... nyoqn0.jpg" target="_blank></img>
Miyazaki's "Ponyo on the Cliff by the Sea"
-->Japanese release July 19th, 2008!
Miyazaki's "Ponyo on the Cliff by the Sea"
-->Japanese release July 19th, 2008!
- Disney Duster
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 14017
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: America
What happened to that fox and that hound?!
Regarding the animation, the whole trailer seemed jerky to me, so I think it was just the speed of the computer. On some computers, the movie loads/plays slow and skips a few frames. But the number of frames is the least of my worries. The characters don't look like themselves at all! Especially Todd. There's something wrong with his mouth. And both his and Copper's eyes are bigger and more cartoony! It just looks really bad.Lord Yupa wrote:Is it just me...or does the animation look a little jerky for even a DTV, as if they decided not hire as many inbetweeners as usual. I mean, I noticed some strobe when the characters moved. Maybe it's just me, though.
As for the little hints at a story, it is definately silly. The event of a friendship being torn between one friend wanting to be part of something the other friend not wanting to be a part of that something has been done many times before. It's nothing compared to the first movie, about a friendship being torn between too friends who are trained to be enemies. Although that has been done before, too, it's much more meaningful and serious than, "I won't be your friend if you join that group of country singing dogs!"

- singerguy04
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:40 pm
- Location: The Land of Lincoln
i just never saw a sequel or anything to add to this movie as being really needed. It's pretty powerful as it is, and adding something that's not as serious as the original isn't really a good thing. However, i think it will fit well as a midquel just because it's not all that serious. This will dive deeper into their childhood and proove even more just how tragic it is that they are forced to become enemies later on in life. It could make the original even sadder, which i don't know is that great of a thing, lol.
Overall i'll probably like it because anything that has a Disney logo on it tends to entertain me.
Overall i'll probably like it because anything that has a Disney logo on it tends to entertain me.
- sealightbreeze
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:31 pm
See, they even used a colour scheme that matched the story!Wikipedia wrote:Purple as one of the liturgical colors in Christian symbolism can express sorrow and mourning.

And look, Christian symbolism too! That will mean all the churches will tell people to buy the DVD. Well done Disney!
Oh dear. It also says
Perhaps I didn't think this through.Wikipedia wrote:Purple is the color of insanity.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
- Disney-Fan
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:59 am
- Location: Where it's flat and immense and the heat is intense
- Contact:
I'd prefer another midquel trash fest that can be ignored, rather than a sequel that will ruin the beautiful bittersweet ending of the first movie. It might not be Disney's most recognized classics, but in my opinion it's one of Disney's best efforts at storytelling. It fits the Disney 'genre', yet has a mature narrative of the characters. Nothing is forced upon us. Everything is built up until the tragic end.
So, in short after a long ramble.... Let them make all the midquels they wish, so long as it doesn't ruin the memory of the beautiful end.
So, in short after a long ramble.... Let them make all the midquels they wish, so long as it doesn't ruin the memory of the beautiful end.
"See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve." - The Joker
- Roger Rabbit
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 3:40 pm
- Location: Upstate New York, USA
Wow...never thought I'd see that coming...a midquel where Copper instead of going hunting goes singing....or something like that. Where exactly is that going to fit in again? At least the style of the characters is pretty faithful to the original ones.
<b>You were born original and unique; don't die a copy.</b>