here's a little something:
A Bug's Life
-
TheSequelOfDisney
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5263
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:30 pm
- Location: Ohio, United States of America
A Bug's Life
Why do you really not hear about A Bug's Life? Everytime there is a commercial for a new Pixar movie, you don't here from the creators of A Bug's Life. Why is that? Was A Bug's Life not very good at the Box Office? For the commercials for Finding Nemo it said from the creators of Toy Story and Monster's, Inc., but never for A Bug's Life Can someone please explain why Pixar, to me, feels like A Bug's Life was a dissapointment, and that they don't praise it like their other movies?
here's a little something:

here's a little something:
The Divulgations of One Desmond Leica: http://desmondleica.wordpress.com/
It grossed less in North America than any other Pixar film. Now at the time, there were only 2, and it was $30 million shy of <i>Toy Story</i> (a difference it more than made up internationally), but it remains only the 6th highest-grossing of the 6 Pixar films as far as domestic returns are concerned. I would imagine it's also sold less home video copies than most if not all of the Pixar films. And it didn't get quite as unanimously praised as <i>Toy Story</i> and subsequent Pixar films have. (Though it was close, and it's still in the 90% range at that "Tomatoes" site.)
Still, its reputation as the least of Pixar's films is something I and many others would dispute. (I'd rank it among Pixar's better half.) I wouldn't put too much stock into worrying about its status - it was still a huge blockbuster and isn't going to be forgotten very soon. Think of it as the Chris Mullin of Pixar's Dream Team, if you will. It will still likely make the Hall of Fame, eventually. Besides, <i>Toy Story</i>, <i>Toy Story 2</i>, and <i>Monsters, Inc.</i> aren't being mentioned in many of the trailers for <i>Cars</i> either. They just go with what is freshest in people's minds. In Europe, <i>A Bug's Life</i> was a bigger success than <i>Toy Story</i> and would be more likely to be cited in ads there.
Still, its reputation as the least of Pixar's films is something I and many others would dispute. (I'd rank it among Pixar's better half.) I wouldn't put too much stock into worrying about its status - it was still a huge blockbuster and isn't going to be forgotten very soon. Think of it as the Chris Mullin of Pixar's Dream Team, if you will. It will still likely make the Hall of Fame, eventually. Besides, <i>Toy Story</i>, <i>Toy Story 2</i>, and <i>Monsters, Inc.</i> aren't being mentioned in many of the trailers for <i>Cars</i> either. They just go with what is freshest in people's minds. In Europe, <i>A Bug's Life</i> was a bigger success than <i>Toy Story</i> and would be more likely to be cited in ads there.
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
-
TheSequelOfDisney
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5263
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:30 pm
- Location: Ohio, United States of America
Okay, thanks luke! Wish I could put some dancing elephants. Why does Escapay have so many forms to use those?!?!?!?!
The Divulgations of One Desmond Leica: http://desmondleica.wordpress.com/
TheSequelofDisney wrote:Okay, thanks luke! Wish I could put some dancing elephants. Why does Escapay have so many forms to use those?!?!?!?!
My DVD Collection:
http://www.dvdspot.com/member=DisneyGirl
http://www.dvdspot.com/member=DisneyGirl
- Jake Lipson
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:33 pm
The only reason the first trailer for Cars had A Bug's Life mentioned was because the music used during that portion of the trailer was Randy Newman's theme from A Bug's Life. I too hold that it deserves a whole lot more respect than it gets.
Also see my earlier thread on this from when Finding Nemo came out:
http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=95.
Unfortunately it is as I feared; the movie's reputation doesn't seem to have been helped much by the DVD reissue as I had hoped it would.
Also see my earlier thread on this from when Finding Nemo came out:
http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=95.
Unfortunately it is as I feared; the movie's reputation doesn't seem to have been helped much by the DVD reissue as I had hoped it would.
<a href=http://jakelipson.dvdaf.com/owned/ target=blank>My modest collection of little silver movie discss</a>
- Escapay
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 12562
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
- Contact:
MinnieMe wrote:TheSequelofDisney wrote:Okay, thanks luke! Wish I could put some dancing elephants. Why does Escapay have so many forms to use those?!?!?!?!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
First elephant on loan to MinnieMe: $10
Second elephant on loan to MinnieMe: $25 (he's got tenure)
Selling four more elephants to MinnieMe: $40
TheSequelofDisney actually believing I've got a monopoly on them: Priceless
Escapay
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?
WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion?
WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
-
TheSequelOfDisney
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5263
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:30 pm
- Location: Ohio, United States of America
Escapay wrote:MinnieMe wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
First elephant on loan to MinnieMe: $10
Second elephant on loan to MinnieMe: $25 (he's got tenure)
Selling four more elephants to MinnieMe: $40![]()
![]()
![]()
TheSequelofDisney actually believing I've got a monopoly on them: Priceless
Escapay
The Divulgations of One Desmond Leica: http://desmondleica.wordpress.com/
- MadonnasManOne
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2748
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:08 pm
- Artlad
- Limited Issue
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:22 pm
- Location: Sunny (and sometimes soggy) Florida
I thought that the reason was because it was directed by John Lasseter. Since Cars is Lasseter's first film since Toy Story 2 I figured they were reminding us of the the ones Lasseter directed.The only reason the first trailer for Cars had A Bug's Life mentioned was because the music used during that portion of the trailer was Randy Newman's theme from A Bug's Life. I too hold that it deserves a whole lot more respect than it gets.
-
mvealf
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 9:02 am
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Speaking of A Bug's Life music, the Japanese trailer uses "Teenage Wasteland" from The Who as theme music. I never could figure that one out.Jake Lipson wrote:The only reason the first trailer for Cars had A Bug's Life mentioned was because the music used during that portion of the trailer was Randy Newman's theme from A Bug's Life. I too hold that it deserves a whole lot more respect than it gets.
Visit the home of my Disney Japanese laserdiscs
http://www.geocities.com/disney_laserdiscs
http://www.geocities.com/disney_laserdiscs
- blackcauldron85
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:54 am
- Gender: Female
- Contact:
Which professional actor was the original voice of Heimlich the caterpillar?
http://jimhillmedia.com/Editor_In_Chief ... illar.aspx
http://jimhillmedia.com/Editor_In_Chief ... illar.aspx

- KubrickFan
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:22 am
Great, now I can't get the thought of Al Pacino being the voice of Hopper, or William H. Macy being Marlin out of my head. Sure, Kevin Spacey is exceptional as Hopper, but Al Pacino? That would be awesome. I also wonder why Macy didn't work out, since he's a great actor and can do the lovable (and not so lovable) loser in his sleep, probably.blackcauldron85 wrote:Which professional actor was the original voice of Heimlich the caterpillar?
http://jimhillmedia.com/Editor_In_Chief ... illar.aspx

- blackcauldron85
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 16689
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:54 am
- Gender: Female
- Contact:
(Maybe I should've put this in the Pixar thread and not the Bug's Life thread..?KubrickFan wrote: I also wonder why Macy didn't work out, since he's a great actor and can do the lovable (and not so lovable) loser in his sleep, probably.
http://jimhillmedia.com/Editor_In_Chief ... -nemo.aspx
Speaking of Marlin ... One of the other reasons that Disney's then-Chairman & CEO wasn't all that enthusiastic about "Finding Nemo" was the actor that Andrew initially hired to provide the voice of the Father clownfish. William H. Macy's vocal performance in this role just lacked ... something. Though this award-winning performer tried his damnest, he just couldn't make Marlin a character that you cared about. Which is why Stanton was eventually forced to recast this role.
And as for the actor that Andrew eventually did hire to play the Father clownfish, the "Finding Nemo" director had this to say about that performer:
Albert Brooks. He absolutely saved this picture. He is exactly what I needed this father character to be. You needed someone who was neurotic, over-protective but still appealing throughout. And that is one of Albert's gifts. That he can sort of play both. Usually it's such an off-putting thing. But he just makes it so winning.
But -- again -- the version of "Finding Nemo" that Michael Eisner saw didn't have Albert Brooks performing the voice of Marlin. But rather William H. Macy. Who's a very talented man but not the right guy if you're looking for the proper performer to voice an over-protective clownfish.

- KubrickFan
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:22 am
Okay, it didn't work out. Too bad, but it happens a lot. Though I wonder if Jim Hill has actually seen bits of it with Macy, because if he doesn't think Macy can do overprotective, Hill needs to rewatch some movies, I think.blackcauldron85 wrote:(Maybe I should've put this in the Pixar thread and not the Bug's Life thread..?KubrickFan wrote: I also wonder why Macy didn't work out, since he's a great actor and can do the lovable (and not so lovable) loser in his sleep, probably.)
http://jimhillmedia.com/Editor_In_Chief ... -nemo.aspx
Speaking of Marlin ... One of the other reasons that Disney's then-Chairman & CEO wasn't all that enthusiastic about "Finding Nemo" was the actor that Andrew initially hired to provide the voice of the Father clownfish. William H. Macy's vocal performance in this role just lacked ... something. Though this award-winning performer tried his damnest, he just couldn't make Marlin a character that you cared about. Which is why Stanton was eventually forced to recast this role.
And as for the actor that Andrew eventually did hire to play the Father clownfish, the "Finding Nemo" director had this to say about that performer:
Albert Brooks. He absolutely saved this picture. He is exactly what I needed this father character to be. You needed someone who was neurotic, over-protective but still appealing throughout. And that is one of Albert's gifts. That he can sort of play both. Usually it's such an off-putting thing. But he just makes it so winning.
But -- again -- the version of "Finding Nemo" that Michael Eisner saw didn't have Albert Brooks performing the voice of Marlin. But rather William H. Macy. Who's a very talented man but not the right guy if you're looking for the proper performer to voice an over-protective clownfish.
