Not to burn this site (i luv it) but Chicken Little is listed as the 45th anitmated Classic (under the specific section on this site)
That seems wrong to me on many levels but mostly because Disney doesn't seem to classify it as a classic?
Last edited by DisneZ on Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Disney deciding to do CGI only is like a Rembrand or Van Gogh throwing away their brushes and picking up a camera because the photograph was invented,...'nobody would want to see their paintings anymore'..............smart move....
Every movie produced for theaters by Walt Disney Feature Animation, whether hand-drawn, CGI, 2D, 3D, or whatever, is on the list of animated classics, and this group includes Chicken Little.
"Mustard? Don't let's be silly!"
--Mad Hatter, Alice in Wonderland
mmm really? but what's the difference then with movies like dinosaur, James and the G-Peach and Pooh&Friends movies? They are listed among the "Other Animation"
Disney deciding to do CGI only is like a Rembrand or Van Gogh throwing away their brushes and picking up a camera because the photograph was invented,...'nobody would want to see their paintings anymore'..............smart move....
DisneZ wrote:mmm really? but what's the difference then with movies like dinosaur, James and the G-Peach and Pooh&Friends movies? They are listed among the "Other Animation"
Those movies weren't produced by Walt Disney Feature Animation, but by other departments.
Disney deciding to do CGI only is like a Rembrand or Van Gogh throwing away their brushes and picking up a camera because the photograph was invented,...'nobody would want to see their paintings anymore'..............smart move....
And though Disney has downplayed the Animated Classics list in the US for a few years, they've continued to use that brand in the UK and there, <i>Chicken Little</i> is indeed identified as the 45th "Classic."