Disney Studios Scared off By Affleck's Image - Cancel Film

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Post Reply
User avatar
indianajdp
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1813
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 7:10 pm
Location: Central Hoosierland

Disney Studios Scared off By Affleck's Image - Cancel Film

Post by indianajdp »

http://www.msnbc.com/news/984669.asp?0cv=CB20

All I can say is ... WHEW 8)
Although it does concern me that Disney signed a deal that requires them to pay Affleck regardless...I can't see any other studio wanting to take this mess off of their hands.

----------

Studio pulls plug on Affleck movie
Actor’s tarnished image reportedly scared off Disney


LOS ANGELES, Oct. 24 — Four weeks from starting production on its Ben Affleck wedding comedy “Ghosts of Girlfriends Past,” the Walt Disney Co. has had a case of matrimonial jitters.The studio pulled the plug on the project late Monday.

“GHOSTS” WAS TO star Affleck as a bachelor who goes to his younger brother’s wedding, where he is visited by the ghosts of his past girlfriends. In August, Betty Thomas (”I Spy”) came on board to direct the film, and several high-profile castings were close to being finalized.

Disney declined comment on the decision. But it is believed that in addition to the film’s expected high cost, another contributing factor was Affleck’s tarnished image. The star has taken a beating in the tabloids and at the box office with the failure of his most recent film, “Gigli.” He returns to theaters on Christmas Day with the John Woo actioner ”Paycheck.”

Because Disney signed a pay-or-play deal with Affleck — meaning that he gets paid even if the movie is not made — it has reason to hope that one of its competitors will step in to take the project off its hands.

Representatives from Affleck’s LivePlanet production company, which is producing the film along with Jon Shestack, could not be reached for comment.
" There's no Dumbass Vaccine " - Jimmy Buffett
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

He's a terrible leading man - the only movies of his I can enjoy are those where he's a supporting character.
User avatar
BriarRose32
Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 2:21 pm
Location: West Palm Beach, fl

Post by BriarRose32 »

I agree with you Luke. I really liked his role in Armageddon (sp?) other than that I can't think of anything else.
User avatar
Loomis
Signature Collection
Posts: 6357
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
Contact:

Post by Loomis »

Luke wrote:He's a terrible leading man - the only movies of his I can enjoy are those where he's a supporting character.
I have to disagree. In Chasing Amy (Miramax) he was a great and honest leading man. His supporting roles have been good though.

The worst thing about this is that Kevin Smith's Jersey Girl (also Miramax) may suffer publicity-wise because of the J-Lo-Affleck connection, although all reports indicate it will be a terrific film.

I just find it a shame that such things, in a supposedly "creative" industry, can happen. I know essentially it is a business, but you'd like to think that actors are chosen for more than their 'bankability'.
Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
User avatar
IggieKuzco
Special Edition
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:04 am
Location: Wonderland
Contact:

Post by IggieKuzco »

BriarRose32 wrote:I agree with you Luke. I really liked his role in Armageddon (sp?) other than that I can't think of anything else.
I think he rocked in Mallrats (a minor role)...... but like Loomis said...
Loomis wrote:I have to disagree. In Chasing Amy (Miramax) he was a great and honest leading man. His supporting roles have been good though.
He really was awsome in Chasing Amy.... i personally think it was his best ever... even though it was Jason Lee who stole the show in that flick....
55 days 'till Jack is back

They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head. - Blackadder the Third
Uncle Remus
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 6:24 am
Location: In the South.

Post by Uncle Remus »

i dont like Ben Afleck at all. i alos dont like having to hear all this news about J-Lo and Ben.
User avatar
IggieKuzco
Special Edition
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:04 am
Location: Wonderland
Contact:

Post by IggieKuzco »

Uncle Remus wrote:i dont like Ben Afleck at all. i alos dont like having to hear all this news about J-Lo and Ben
yeah... it's seriously getting boring already!!
55 days 'till Jack is back

They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head. - Blackadder the Third
STASHONE
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 5:32 pm

Post by STASHONE »

Agree with Chasing Amy and Mallrats and he was a good suppoorting actor in Good Will Hunting, Dogma and Dazed and Confused also. Plus he killed his role in Boiler Room. I just got the dvd last week.
User avatar
indianajdp
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1813
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 7:10 pm
Location: Central Hoosierland

Post by indianajdp »

Luke wrote:He's a terrible leading man - the only movies of his I can enjoy are those where he's a supporting character.
For the most part I agree. Sure he's had at least one solid performance (Chasing Amy), but all-in-all it just doesn't seem to work too well for him. He was just too cheesy in Pearl Harbor.
" There's no Dumbass Vaccine " - Jimmy Buffett
User avatar
quasi72
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:41 am
Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Post by quasi72 »

I have a problem with Ben Affleck: I can't believe in any of his characters. I always see Ben Affleck as... and that, to me, doesn't make a good actor.
Sanctuary! Please, give me Sanctuary!
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

Ben isn't a bad actor. He's won an Oscar for his role in Shakespeare in Love (not that he deserved it).

His problem is, mainly, his choice of movies. He can do well. He was good in Good Will Hunting and Chasing Amy. He was even reasonable in Daredevil (I wasn't expecting him to be). And don't forget "Affleck was da bomb in Phantoms" :)

So he's always Ben Affleck. Eastwood is always Eastwood. Arnie is always Arnie. Technically he may not be a character actor - but I think he could be if he had a chance - but he's what Hollywood wants these days.

Look at Depp in Pirates - the Hollywood Execs wanted him to tone his performance down. In other words they wanted his acting to be blander. Perhaps Ben has the same demands made, and simply does what is asked.

I think when Ben's ten years older, we will see some better and more character driven acting from him.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

2099net wrote:Ben isn't a bad actor. He's won an Oscar for his role in Shakespeare in Love (not that he deserved it).
Actually he wasn't even nominated for that. His "Oscar winner" label is strictly as co-writer of "Good Will Hunting."
Post Reply