The Black Cauldron: Live-Action?
The Black Cauldron: Live-Action?
Just wondering what you guys like of a live action remake of The Black Cauldron. I know with the "books make good fantasy adventure movies" era we are in that this could be done really good and disney owns all the rights to the books still. The High King would be a frickin awesome movie. What do you think?
-
Aladdin from Agrabah
- Special Edition
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:10 pm
If you think That Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter and Narnia are huge success and directors seem like they found what today's audience wants, yeah, the Black Cauldron is a great oppurtunity for the filmmakers.
I've heard very bad words about Disney's Black Cauldron, but I'haven't seen and probably will never see it, cause in my country it never came, even as a theatrical release. So it would be nice for me to see that story in cinemas, even in life-action.
I've heard very bad words about Disney's Black Cauldron, but I'haven't seen and probably will never see it, cause in my country it never came, even as a theatrical release. So it would be nice for me to see that story in cinemas, even in life-action.
- Fflewduur
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:14 am
- Location: Waiting For Somebody
It is an idea whose time has come! Really, The Prydain Chronicles deserve a more sensitive treatment than The Black Cauldron could give. Disney should go back to the beginning & make The Book of Three, then move on from there.
Of course if anyone at Disney listened to me, they'd make a jazz Fantasia.
Of course if anyone at Disney listened to me, they'd make a jazz Fantasia.
- jwa1107
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 3:15 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
- Contact:
right there with you on both counts, Fflam man!Fflewduur wrote:It is an idea whose time has come! Really, The Prydain Chronicles deserve a more sensitive treatment than The Black Cauldron could give. Disney should go back to the beginning & make The Book of Three, then move on from there.
Of course if anyone at Disney listened to me, they'd make a jazz Fantasia.
there is no way to undo the mess Disney made of The Black Cauldron, but it could be rectified by live action movies (which might even make a decent sales increase in the animated version too)
-
Lars Vermundsberget
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
- Location: Norway
- lord-of-sith
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2288
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 7:03 pm
- Gender: Male (He/Him/His)
I thought the animated film was good! I don't understand the negative remarks like:
I thought the darker tone was really good, and I think Disney should do something darker than anything done in the past 10 years. They should team up with Tim Burton and do something. I guess, after Corpse Bride, I'm just dying for more dark animated features.jwa1107 wrote: there is no way to undo the mess Disney made of The Black Cauldron
- Fflewduur
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:14 am
- Location: Waiting For Somebody
Tim Burton was working for Disney at the time & did some conceptual work for The Black Cauldron that was darker & (I think) more compelling than what actually made it into the movie.lord-of-sith wrote:I thought the darker tone was really good, and I think Disney should do something darker than anything done in the past 10 years. They should team up with Tim Burton and do something.
This was the first Disney animated film to get a PG rating, I guess. Mostly I wish it had been made when someone were truly minding the store for feature animation & WD Pictures in general--the 80s were dark days.
-
goofystitch
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 1:30 pm
- Location: Walt Disney World
Fflewduur wrote:
Maybe Disney animation wasn't at it's peak in the 80's, but how were the 80's dark days? "The Fox and the Hound" is popular enough to have a direct to video sequel. "Oliver and Company" has a decent sized following and was given a "special edition" treatment. I love "The Great Mouse Detective" and "The Little Mermaid" was the dawn of one of Disney's greatest periods. One movie in the 80's was a box office failure and is widely overlooked by the general public. Most decades in Disney history had a failure. "Alice in Wonderland" wasn't a success upon initial release. I don't think you could refer to the 50's as dark days due to one failure. Therefore, I don't see how you can considder the 80's to be dark days. I would say that if any period in Disney animation history can be classified as "dark days," it would be the period we are in now. While I enjoy the current animated features, I don't see them withstanding the test of time. My children will probably not laugh when Chicken Little says "Oh snap!""Mostly I wish it had been made when someone were truly minding the store for feature animation & WD Pictures in general--the 80s were dark days."
-
Lars Vermundsberget
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
- Location: Norway
- Fflewduur
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:14 am
- Location: Waiting For Somebody
I was probably speaking of dark days for Disney the corporate structure as much as for feature animation--this is the period when the company was in danger of being dismantled & sold off piecemeal (and as mad as I've been with Eisner for several years I'll still thank him keeping the company together).
And I'll admit it was a bit of a generalization, yes. But direct-to-video sequel notwithstanding (when is that a guarantee of quality anyway?), "The Fox and the Hound" was the first Disney movie I was ever disappointed in--at the age of 12, when i saw it on its first theatrical release. And I wasn't swept away by a Disney film again until "The Little Mermaid."
I don't intend to debate the 80s canon in depth in this thread...but I would agree that I'd be more likely to spend money on "Oliver & Company" than "Home on the Range," "Lilo & Stitch," or (shudder) "The Emperor's New Groove."
And I'll admit it was a bit of a generalization, yes. But direct-to-video sequel notwithstanding (when is that a guarantee of quality anyway?), "The Fox and the Hound" was the first Disney movie I was ever disappointed in--at the age of 12, when i saw it on its first theatrical release. And I wasn't swept away by a Disney film again until "The Little Mermaid."
I don't intend to debate the 80s canon in depth in this thread...but I would agree that I'd be more likely to spend money on "Oliver & Company" than "Home on the Range," "Lilo & Stitch," or (shudder) "The Emperor's New Groove."
-
Lars Vermundsberget
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
- Location: Norway
- jwa1107
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 3:15 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
- Contact:
don't get me wrong; I like the end product, BUT I think it could have been so much better. In particular the "mess" IMHO is the mashing of the stories from "The Book Of Three" and "The Black Cauldron" I don't mind that the Horned King replaces Arwan, but I think the story was weaker than it had to be.lord-of-sith wrote:I thought the animated film was good! I don't understand the negative remarks like:
I thought the darker tone was really good, and I think Disney should do something darker than anything done in the past 10 years. They should team up with Tim Burton and do something. I guess, after Corpse Bride, I'm just dying for more dark animated features.jwa1107 wrote: there is no way to undo the mess Disney made of The Black Cauldron
I have a personal problem in not being able to get past some mashings like Wonderland and Looking-Glass when I think both could have been excellent on their own. But I still like Alice and I still like Black Cauldron.
-
Aladdin from Agrabah
- Special Edition
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:10 pm
-
Lars Vermundsberget
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
- Location: Norway
- Fflewduur
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:14 am
- Location: Waiting For Somebody
I think another reason the 80s seem so bleak was the production & release schedule--only 2 movies came out in the 8 years following The Rescuers. That's a pretty long wait. Today if you're disappointed in the latest release--well, there's always next year!
Also...I think I'm a member of the last generation whose first exposure to most of the Disney canon was actually at a movie theatre and not in front of a VCR; that probably has something to do with my feelings, too. I don't know what movies were re-released when in the 70s & 80s but I feel safe in assuming they were generally better films thanThe Fox and the Hound or The Black Cauldron--the newer product could only suffer by comparison.
My biggest problem is my own, I guess. I want every Disney animated feature to be a great film, and I suppose it's unrealistic to expect a Pinocchio or a Beauty & the Beast with every debut. But I'd be willing to wait three years between releases if they stood a better chance of knocking one out of the park each time.
Also...I think I'm a member of the last generation whose first exposure to most of the Disney canon was actually at a movie theatre and not in front of a VCR; that probably has something to do with my feelings, too. I don't know what movies were re-released when in the 70s & 80s but I feel safe in assuming they were generally better films thanThe Fox and the Hound or The Black Cauldron--the newer product could only suffer by comparison.
My biggest problem is my own, I guess. I want every Disney animated feature to be a great film, and I suppose it's unrealistic to expect a Pinocchio or a Beauty & the Beast with every debut. But I'd be willing to wait three years between releases if they stood a better chance of knocking one out of the park each time.

