It hurts me... In the deepest...

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Tangela

It hurts me... In the deepest...

Post by Tangela »

Take a look at this quotes that I've seen through the internet:
"Disney finally gets into he sex movie business" (Referring to the rescuers)

"Disney recalls dirty movie" (the Rescuers)

"The Rescuers should have been a porn film"

"Disney's first R-Rated film"

"The greatest, dirtiest film yet!"

"The most gross and dirty Disney Film"
This are quotes that all refer to The Rescuers, imagine how I'm feeling...

What do you guys think...?

:cry: :cry: :cry:
User avatar
BasilOfBakerStreet427
In The Vaults
Posts: 700
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 6:31 pm
Location: 9764 Jeopardy Lane With Al,Peg,Kelly and Bud Bundy

Post by BasilOfBakerStreet427 »

All it was was two topless women.Why call it dirty?
G'Day!
My DVD Collection

Miracle 2/6/2004
Home On The Range 4/2/2004
User avatar
MickeyMousePal
Signature Collection
Posts: 6629
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 10:40 pm
Location: The Incredibles LA!!!
Contact:

Post by MickeyMousePal »

I think that's horrible they misjudge the film. :(

It's a good movie people just like to give negative reviews.

Why do people put bad things like that.

I say Rescuers was a very touching story for me. :D :D :D
The Simpsons Season 11 Buy it Now!

Fox Sunday lineup:

8:00 The Simpsons
8:30 King of the Hill
9:00 Family Guy
9:30 American Dad

Living in the 1980's:
Image
User avatar
Lady
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 429
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 10:19 pm

Post by Lady »

must be religious fanatics
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

You're really pushing the Rescuers threads per week quota....
Tangela

Post by Tangela »

Luke wrote:You're really pushing the Rescuers threads per week quota....
What...? What do you mean by that, Luke...?

:? :? :?
User avatar
Loomis
Signature Collection
Posts: 6357
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
Contact:

Post by Loomis »

BasilOfBakerStreet427 wrote:All it was was two topless women.Why call it dirty?
Because most censorship boards, especially in the US, seem to have more of an issue with sex and nudity than they do with violence.

You get a lesser rating for Neo killing a bunch of innocent people in a lobby than you would for two people doing what comes natural...

Trust the media to blow it out of proportion.
Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
User avatar
BasilOfBakerStreet427
In The Vaults
Posts: 700
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 6:31 pm
Location: 9764 Jeopardy Lane With Al,Peg,Kelly and Bud Bundy

Post by BasilOfBakerStreet427 »

Maybe call The Rescuers with two topless pictures of women PG-13(Singles had 3,and Sixteen Candles which was PG,had 1.)But,that was MPAA,1984.Now,because of a certain religous cult in Utah,67% of films are rated R.Stupid MPAA!
G'Day!
My DVD Collection

Miracle 2/6/2004
Home On The Range 4/2/2004
User avatar
Udvarnoky
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 7:34 pm

Post by Udvarnoky »

Considering that these two offensive frames did not have the images in the original print, it's not fair to blame the film itself.
User avatar
PheR
Special Edition
Posts: 510
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:08 am
Location: México

Post by PheR »

don´t worry Tangela!!! it´s a good thing to have some controversy, it adds some salt and pepper and more eyes to the movie...my favourite movie was acused to have a sex message, so what?!!

Anyway, the rescuers is a great movie, with or without boobs in it :lol:
I'ts enough for this restless warrior just to be with you...
XxSuRgEoxX
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
Contact:

Post by XxSuRgEoxX »

Luke wrote:You're really pushing the Rescuers threads per week quota....

:lol:
Tangela

Post by Tangela »

XxSuRgEoxX wrote:
Luke wrote:You're really pushing the Rescuers threads per week quota....

:lol:
I still don't know what Luke meant by that!!!

:? :? :?
User avatar
BasilOfBakerStreet427
In The Vaults
Posts: 700
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 6:31 pm
Location: 9764 Jeopardy Lane With Al,Peg,Kelly and Bud Bundy

Post by BasilOfBakerStreet427 »

Hey,PheR.Can I guess what your favorite movie is.Is it Yu Tu Mama Tambien(And Your Mother Too)?
G'Day!
My DVD Collection

Miracle 2/6/2004
Home On The Range 4/2/2004
User avatar
Porce
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 9:53 pm
Location: Undisclosed

Post by Porce »

Lady wrote:must be religious fanatics
Is there something wrong with being said "religious fanatic"?? :roll:
The user formerly known as Dacp
User avatar
indianajdp
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1813
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 7:10 pm
Location: Central Hoosierland

Post by indianajdp »

Tangela wrote:
XxSuRgEoxX wrote:
:lol:
I still don't know what Luke meant by that!!!

:? :? :?
It means he's getting a bit bothered by the fact that you have started about ten or so Rescuer's threads in the past couple weeks. One or two should be sufficient to discuss topics related to the movie.

I think it's great that you are so passionate about the film, but don't think you should start a new thread about The Rescuers everytime you have another thought about it. It clutters up the forum and I think ultimately hurts the chances that folks will continue to respond to them.

My recommendation: Start one more OFFICIAL Rescuers thread and discuss ALL THINGS Rescuers in there. When the need arises to talk about something else related to the movie...you know where it would need to go 8)
Last edited by indianajdp on Sat Oct 18, 2003 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
" There's no Dumbass Vaccine " - Jimmy Buffett
User avatar
quasi72
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 11:41 am
Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Post by quasi72 »

People that judge a Disney animated featured like that are truly SICK.
Tangela, don't get upset.
Let's ignore ignorants.

The Rescuers and TRDown Under are beautidul good hearted films that touch my sensibility to the deepest. I love them.
Sanctuary! Please, give me Sanctuary!
User avatar
IggieKuzco
Special Edition
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:04 am
Location: Wonderland
Contact:

Post by IggieKuzco »

Look... i dont see what the big deal is here! it's about 2 micro-seconds of film and even when i saw the stills of it it was hard to make out!
personally.... it wouldn't bother me too much if they did it more often... to add a little sauciness to the flick@ :wink:
Luke wrote:You're really pushing the Rescuers threads per week quota....
LoL!! :lol:
55 days 'till Jack is back

They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head. - Blackadder the Third
User avatar
Chernabog
Special Edition
Posts: 945
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 1:56 pm
Location: Malmo, Sweden

Post by Chernabog »

:twisted:
YEah, I think this is so incredibly silly so there is only to laugh about it... :lol:
User avatar
karlsen
Special Edition
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Norway

Post by karlsen »

Some people are just in such an hate for Disney that they will take whatever they can find to "show" that Disney is bad.

I think it seas more about the people that can find a penis in the castle in the mermaied movie then about anything else. To me that shows how perverted these people realy are and that they see thing like this even where there are nothing to see.

I even read that the man that draw that picture did not even see it before a long time after people had begun to speak about it.

The Disney studio have nothing to gain in something like this, so why should they.

But I found it funny that this topic was started by tangella, the same boy that stated in the topic about the covers that he did not like the dirty version of the mermaide cover. :lol:

In the resquers there realy are a dirty picture, in the little mermaid there are nothing at all. 8)
User avatar
thomashton
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: College Ward, Utah
Contact:

Post by thomashton »

BasilOfBakerStreet427 wrote:Maybe call The Rescuers with two topless pictures of women PG-13(Singles had 3,and Sixteen Candles which was PG,had 1.)But,that was MPAA,1984.Now,because of a certain religous cult in Utah,67% of films are rated R.Stupid MPAA!
Which religious cult is this that has that much power of the MPAA?
To all who come to this happy place, Welcome...Disneyland is your land...
Post Reply