disneyprincess11 wrote:Julie Andrews and DickĀ van Dyke, whose performances areĀ iconic and can not be outdone. Not to mention that she won an Oscar for it. Despite her age and singing voice, I can't see why JulieĀ can't reprise her role. The fact that they're getting another actress is terrible.Ā Dick's Bert can easily get a cameo.Ā
Julie will be gracious about this. She complimented Carrie Underwood in
The Sound of Music for goodness' sakes. She'll give the film her seal of approval, and if Disney wants her at the red carpet premiere or to do promotion for the film, she'll go. I'd love for her to rip it, but that's not Julie.
disneyprincess11 wrote:And most of all, P.L Travers, who hated the movie to literally the point of tears and now, they're making it worse for Travers with this sequels. Are the people, who hold the rights, even going to approve this? Disney needed special permission for the musical.
Well, I don't think P.L. is exactly spinning in her grave over this news, nor do I think Disney would have announced this project without securing the rights. There are contradictory reports regarding how Travers felt about the film-- some indicate she despised it, others that she watched it all the time. And in the 80s, P.L. actually worked on a script for a sequel to the Disney film that was to star Julie as Mary and
Michael Jackson as Bert's brother as Dick van Dyke was deemed to have aged too much at that point. So, maybe P.L. hated the Disney movie, maybe she actually liked it in spite of herself-- we don't know. But she was
always willing to capitalize off the property.
I wonder what they'll call the film? "Mary Poppins"? "Mary Poppins Comes Back" like one of the sequels? Something entirely new?