Song of the South on Dvd Discussion & Speculation Thread

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
Escapay
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 12562
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
Contact:

Post by Escapay »

Cameron wrote:you guys got ripped....i payed 8 bucks....one of the few boots i own, and will gladly replace it for an official release
Bwahaha, I can beat you by $0.50! Though I can't beat four dollars...

Escapay
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion? :p

WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
User avatar
bennyb98
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 339
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 9:22 pm
Location: Orlando, FL for WDWCP

Post by bennyb98 »

If you want to get REALLY technical, part of SOTS was released on the Alice in Wonderland Masterpiece Edition DVD. But that is a stretch... :roll:
memnv
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2699
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:14 pm
Location: Carson City
Contact:

Post by memnv »

I think the Title of this thread needs to be fixed
Dark Knight Rulez
Christian
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 12:07 pm
Location: Orange County
Contact:

Post by Christian »

to not have it released on video just because the black people's lives in that movie were "unrealistic" is ridiculous considering there are much more racist films that are able to get released
It's especially ridiculous since there is absolutely nothing racist about SOTS. There is nothing racist about Pocahontas or Peter Pan either. Pocahontas may not be entirely accurate in depicting native Americans and Peter Pan flagrantly stereotypes them but that still doesn't add up to racism.
Lars Vermundsberget
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Lars Vermundsberget »

SotS is very harmless IMO, but neither am I American nor does my skin have much colour, so how would I know anyway...

As long as enough people make such a big deal about this movie, I guess Disney is going to stay a bit scared of what might happen if... if...

BTW, I've got an official disc of SotS myself.
Lazario

Post by Lazario »

This is excellent news. And it might be the first Disney DVD I buy for keeps.
User avatar
eric89
Limited Issue
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:03 pm

"Song of the South"...My Commentary on the Rumors.

Post by eric89 »

While reading about "Song of the South"'s possible release in Fall of 2006, I decided to look up the past rumours about "Song of the South" being released and the recent marketing possiblities by Disney Co.

We know that Eisner does not want "Song of the South" released. We don't know if that's out of fear, marketing advice, or personal opinion. (Hey, you have to give the guy credit for doing a pretty awesome job while being CEO regardless of his mistakes!) We do know that Roy Disney wants "Song of the South" released to the public. With Eisner stepping down that started a huge amount of rumors. But think about it, Eisner wasn't the only man with this opinion inside Camp Disney, he must have had a group of high-level execs. who felt the same way. To be honest, I think it might be possible for a release, but a very VERY limited one unless Roy and those around him can change those people's minds.

But, if you look at recent "Treasure" releases and "Anniversary" material for Disney Animation, Disney Theme Parks, and Disney Pictures you'll see that a little more of "Song of the South" (Brer Group in particular) has been placed than ever before. For example the new edition of "Who Framed Roger Rabit?" includes some promotional material for "Song of the South" in it's Special Features, The Disney "Treasures" is rumoured (though I haven't seen it) to have a clip of the movie in one of it's installments and Disneyland/Word seems to be putting out a lot more "Song of the South" collectables as the 60th Anniversary for this movie draws near. A hopeful mind, like mine, could guess that Disney is "testing the waters" to get a little taste of public reaction. We know we have good chances for this movie being released due to the fact that there are no recorded complaints abot the '86 re-release on file.

I am hopeful, but highly doubt, that "Song of the South" will be released as soon as the rumors say (Fall of '06). But, I see Disney out there possibly promoting this movie a little more to get the public looking for that movie and when un-able to find it, that "Demand" sets in that needs to be there for a DVD to be released in the first place. (Supply and Demand ya know?) Anoter reason I don't see "Song of the South" being released in Fall of '06 is because Disney is going to be pushing "The Little Mermaid" around that time, but we might see a "Song of the South" release around the spring/summer of '07 because for some odd reason there is no solid schedule for The Platnium Edition DVDs after "The Little Mermaid". Could this maybe be Disney getting prepared for "Song of the South" to get the platnium treatment? I mean, they only have to release this one time and they could get the bootleggers to really be crushed and the public happy. Just some of my thoughts...
John 3:17
Image
Image
User avatar
Roger Rabbit
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Upstate New York, USA

Post by Roger Rabbit »

The longer they wait the more the bootleggers profit because the customer demand is there and Disney hasn't wanted to release it.

Of course Michael may not be the only one who doesn't want SOTS released, but since he's the top dog, he can continue to say "no" as many times as its brought up and that's the end of it. Doesn't matter how many don't want it so long as one person holds the cards as to say if it gets released or not.

I think they may go for an '06 release. Why not? The internet has sturred up a nice rumor and got people talking and now waiting. Instant sales. They'd be foolish not to. Plus I don't think the Little Mermaid will do anything to hurt SOTS since they're very different films.
<b>You were born original and unique; don't die a copy.</b>
User avatar
eric89
Limited Issue
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:03 pm

Post by eric89 »

It's just a fact, that the Platnium Editions get the publicity. If "Song of the South" goes into compitition with "The Little Mermaind" Platnium Edition, "The Little Mermaid" would get most of the promotion. And since "Song of the South" would be marketed as "First Time Ever Released!" Disney needs it to be their season seller.
John 3:17
Image
Image
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

eric89 wrote:It's just a fact, that the Platnium Editions get the publicity. If "Song of the South" goes into compitition with "The Little Mermaind" Platnium Edition, "The Little Mermaid" would get most of the promotion. And since "Song of the South" would be marketed as "First Time Ever Released!" Disney needs it to be their season seller.
I don't think <i>Song of the South</i> would get or need a big marketing campaign to put up big sales numbers on DVD. The Treasures take Disney's vintage material, with very little (if any) marketing, and are able to sell hundreds of thousands of copies as a profitable niche line. <i>Sleeping Beauty</i> was released within a month of <i>The Lion King</i>'s DVD release and one assumes both sold fine - with <i>The Lion King</i> setting records for a catalogue title. Some DVDs will be able to put up impressive numbers with or without advertising behind it. Last year, the "Gargoyles" DVD release seemed as if Disney was consciously NOT trying to promote it in any way - it still rose up Amazon's charts and is bringing a second release in the same fashion. "The Muppet Show" was announced only a couple of months before release and it was a Top 10 seller its first week. Certain things can create interest themselves, simply by keeping the Internet abuzz, climbing up Amazon's charts, etc., and <i>Song of the South</i> has as much of a curiosity/interest factor as any Disney title released or not released, in that regard.
User avatar
eric89
Limited Issue
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:03 pm

Post by eric89 »

That's true. But, I would like to see Song of the South get Platnium or even Masterpiece honors.
John 3:17
Image
Image
User avatar
Roger Rabbit
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Upstate New York, USA

Post by Roger Rabbit »

You'd need commentaries to do that, and I'm not sure who's left thats alive that would do it. Offhand, I forget his name, but I would suspect only the servant boy is still alive. I know the one who played Johnny isn't alive anymore. Just wouldn't be easy.
<b>You were born original and unique; don't die a copy.</b>
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

Roger Rabbit wrote:You'd need commentaries to do that, and I'm not sure who's left thats alive that would do it. Offhand, I forget his name, but I would suspect only the servant boy is still alive. I know the one who played Johnny isn't alive anymore. Just wouldn't be easy.
The boy who played Toby died last year. I'm not sure if any of the cast are still alive, but an audio commentary by Leonard Maltin or John Canemaker could easily be pulled off, or even another Inside Walt's Story Meetings, if transcripts exist (and only four years away from <i>Bambi</i>, I'd think they do). There is no way that <i>Song of the South</i> will be released as a Platinum Edition, however. Those are the marketing pillars of BVHE's schedule and I don't think you'll find too many advertisers clamoring for some kind of special relationship on this film's DVD the way they do for <i>Cinderella</i> or <i>The Lion King</i>.
User avatar
eric89
Limited Issue
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:03 pm

Post by eric89 »

There's a rumor that they will use a black celebrity to introduce the film and talk about it's importance. Why not have that person do it? Or even better, Leonard Maltin and various other Disney Historians telling the story.
John 3:17
Image
Image
Class316
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 8:03 am

Post by Class316 »

eric89 wrote:There's a rumor that they will use a black celebrity to introduce the film and talk about it's importance. Why not have that person do it? Or even better, Leonard Maltin and various other Disney Historians telling the story.
I'd prefer no one "introduce" it, but if anyone does it better be Maltin!
User avatar
Roger Rabbit
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Upstate New York, USA

Post by Roger Rabbit »

eric89 wrote:There's a rumor that they will use a black celebrity to introduce the film and talk about it's importance. Why not have that person do it? Or even better, Leonard Maltin and various other Disney Historians telling the story.
I think they wanted to use Maya Angelou at one time and she downright rejected it and that's one of the reasons why its never been released to the home video market. Gee I wish I could remember where I read that. I'm sure Luke has the answer. (He always seems to)
<b>You were born original and unique; don't die a copy.</b>
Mr. Toad
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4360
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: Victoria, BC
Contact:

Post by Mr. Toad »

Well Ruth Warwick and Glenn Leady died recently enough that maybe they got some extra material done. Maybe even Luana Patten.

According to IMDB the only cast member still alive is one of Luana Patten's brothers from the movie. Not very relevant.
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

Roger Rabbit wrote:I think they wanted to use Maya Angelou at one time and she downright rejected it and that's one of the reasons why its never been released to the home video market. Gee I wish I could remember where I read that. I'm sure Luke has the answer. (He always seems to)
You read that at JimHillMedia.com, which as always requires a grain of salt, since it is based on unverified insider claims.
Timon/Pumbaa fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3675
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by Timon/Pumbaa fan »

Mr. Toad wrote:Well Ruth Warwick and Glenn Leady died recently enough that maybe they got some extra material done. Maybe even Luana Patten.

According to IMDB the only cast member still alive is one of Luana Patten's brothers from the movie. Not very relevant.
Well Ollie Johnston is still alive!(He animated Br'er Fox)

The DeCastro Sisters could still be alive(uncredited as bird voices)

Also even if all the cast members/workers died, Disney could still easily think of something to put on the DVD. I mean most of the people interviewed for Bambi were mainly credited as "Animation Historians". Not to mention they could also use old clips.

Also they can even do a mini-documentary on Splash Mountain. Nick Stewart(the voice of Br'er Bear) died only about 5 years ago and he provided the voice for Br'er Bear on Splash Mountain. So there are most likely chances that they have interviews of him.

EDIT: As for a black celebrity, how about Bill Cosby. There have been Urban Myths that he bought the rights to this movie so it couldn't be shown again, but of coarse it was false. Alse he did express his feelings about black people so which to me sounded like he would like the film to be released.
Last edited by Timon/Pumbaa fan on Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Roger Rabbit
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Upstate New York, USA

Post by Roger Rabbit »

Ah, yes, Jim Hill...I go there often so I guess that makes sense. :P

I did forget Ollie was still alive. (better slap myself) I'm sure he could offer some input on the live action/animated sequences...how they worked on that. Certainly not a new technique but nowhere as advanced as today either.
<b>You were born original and unique; don't die a copy.</b>
Post Reply