Cinderella III plotline revealed

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kram Nebuer
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1992
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 2:03 pm
Location: Happiest Place on Earth :)
Contact:
Contact Kram Nebuer

Post by Kram Nebuer »

Dan05 wrote:Because all Disney sequels are cheapquels, so it will be nothing different for Cinderella III :P
Oh. Then Disney did an awesome job with their tiny budget for Rescuers Down Under, Toy Story 2, and Fantasia 2000. :o
There's got to be something that trigers the stepmothers rage to make her want to change history. Maybe she was about to lose Drazella like she lost Anastasia.
That makes it sound like they died! :( But really, that's a good suggestion because I really can't see the stepmother going back in time only out of hate for Cinderella.

Anyhow, I recently went to WDW for our Senior class trip (woohoo! :) It was so much fun, btw!) and we went into the villains' store at MGM and they had these funny book series called "My Side of the Story" and they were "written" by the different villains. I remember seeing Maleficient and Lady Tremaine. Maybe Cinderella III could be Cinderella, just from a different point of view, much like Lion King 1 1/2. After all, Lion King 1 1/2 is really Lion King III, but due to the nature of the film and its characters, they changed the title. Maybe this is the same case for Cinderella III? :?
Image
<a href=http://kramnebuer.dvdaf.com/>My ºoº DVDs </a>
Top
User avatar
Isidour
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4092
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:09 pm
Location: Mexico!
Contact:
Contact Isidour

Post by Isidour »

"I was never ment to be an evil stepmother, just I want to teach Cinderella a little discipline and look how far she get!"

Yeah, I can imagine that... :roll: :lol:
Top
User avatar
Disney-Fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:59 am
Location: Where it's flat and immense and the heat is intense
Contact:
Contact Disney-Fan

Post by Disney-Fan »

Kram Nebuer wrote:
Dan05 wrote:Because all Disney sequels are cheapquels, so it will be nothing different for Cinderella III :P
Oh. Then Disney did an awesome job with their tiny budget for Rescuers Down Under, Toy Story 2, and Fantasia 2000. :o
Oh yeah, great comparission. :roll:
"See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve." - The Joker
Top
User avatar
bradhig
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1109
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:59 pm
Location: Olathe , Kansas

Post by bradhig »

Where would Tremaine go back into to change? Prevent Cinderella from going to the ball ,from trying on the slipper, or dragging her back into the palace after midnight?
Top
Key
Special Edition
Posts: 891
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:53 am
Location: SoCal
Contact:
Contact Key

Post by Key »

Hrm... HRM.

Not having warm, fuzzy feelings about this one.
Wherever. Whatever. Have a nice day.
Top
User avatar
Fidget1234
Special Edition
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: New England
Contact:
Contact Fidget1234

Post by Fidget1234 »

Lady Tremain using fairy godmothers magic wand to turn back time? Geez, is she jealous much?

I wonder if Anastasia will be wed to the baker in this flick.....
"Get busy livin', or get busy dyin"
Top
User avatar
bradhig
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1109
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:59 pm
Location: Olathe , Kansas

Post by bradhig »

What is it with Disney fans complaining about sequels. I wish it would stop. I can't stand the term cheapquel whoever came up with that is crazy.
Top
User avatar
Disney-Fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:59 am
Location: Where it's flat and immense and the heat is intense
Contact:
Contact Disney-Fan

Post by Disney-Fan »

bradhig wrote:What is it with Disney fans complaining about sequels. I wish it would stop. I can't stand the term cheapquel whoever came up with that is crazy.
The sequels are done on a low, relitavely cheap budget. Sequel + cheap = Cheapquels. :) I don't like to hear certain things too, but I choose to ignore. I'd suggest you do the same otherwise you won't see the end of it.
"See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve." - The Joker
Top
memnv
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2699
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:14 pm
Location: Carson City
Contact:
Contact memnv

Post by memnv »

Nicely said Disneyfan2000
Dark Knight Rulez
Top
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:
Contact 2099net

Post by 2099net »

DisneyFan 2000 wrote:
bradhig wrote:What is it with Disney fans complaining about sequels. I wish it would stop. I can't stand the term cheapquel whoever came up with that is crazy.
The sequels are done on a low, relitavely cheap budget. Sequel + cheap = Cheapquels. :) I don't like to hear certain things too, but I choose to ignore. I'd suggest you do the same otherwise you won't see the end of it.
But a cheap budget alone doesn't mean a poor film. Which is worse? Star Wars: The Phantom Menace or Star Wars: A New Hope? Van Helsing or Bride of Frankenstein? A Nightmare on Elm Street or Freddy's Dead?
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
Top
User avatar
KinOO
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 2:34 pm
Location: France

Post by KinOO »

But a cheap budget alone doesn't mean a poor film.
In Disney's actual case, it does: Cinderella2, Pocahontas2, HunchBack2... cheap cheap cheap...
Image
Top
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:
Contact 2099net

Post by 2099net »

KinOO wrote:
But a cheap budget alone doesn't mean a poor film.
In Disney's actual case, it does: Cinderella2, Pocahontas2, HunchBack2... cheap cheap cheap...
And some would add Atlantis, Treasure Planet and Home on the Range. Expensive, expensive, expensive. In some cases (HotR), stupidly expensive for a film little over an hour.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
Top
User avatar
KinOO
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 2:34 pm
Location: France

Post by KinOO »

I did'nt say Big budgets meant big movies, the movie industry is full of examples, you're mixing everything in your posts. you talked about cheap budgets taht could turn into huge hits.. anyway i don't see a concret example in Disney's politic.
Image
Top
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:
Contact 2099net

Post by 2099net »

KinOO wrote:I did'nt say Big budgets meant big movies, the movie industry is full of examples, you're mixing everything in your posts. you talked about cheap budgets taht could turn into huge hits.. anyway i don't see a concret example in Disney's politic.
OK. Well I would argue Return to Never Land and Lady and the Tramp 2, and perhaps 101 Dalmatians are good films. They're not cinematic milestones, but they are entertaining and more than watchable. (And I do actually think RtNL is better then the original Peter Pan). Although it's not a sequel, I also enjoy the cheaply budgeted Teacher's Pet movie.

But they are not, and have never meant to be replacements for Disney's Big Budgeted Feature Animation films. Was the Lizzie McGuire movie supposed to be seen in the same light as Pirates of the Caribbean?

Just like live action films can have films of various ambition and budgets, so can animated films. Disney are still investing heavily in big budget animated films.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
Top
User avatar
Jens
Special Edition
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 6:14 pm

Post by Jens »

I heard a twist on this plot of Cinderella III somewhere:
Cinderella III is when the step-mother gets some time thing and Cinderella follows her to different time periods.
Even more interesting!
The Disney Database - All the Disney magic in 1 site!
Top
Timon/Pumbaa fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3675
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by Timon/Pumbaa fan »

A plot for Cinderella 3! WOW :o

How many actual plots are there in a DTV! :lol:
Top
User avatar
bradhig
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1109
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:59 pm
Location: Olathe , Kansas

Post by bradhig »

and I though she was going to try to prevent Cindy from marrying the prince.
Top
User avatar
Little Red Henski
Special Edition
Posts: 801
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:36 am
Location: Miami, FL

Post by Little Red Henski »

So are they really going to bring Mickey back to his date raping, liquor drinking, Blackface wearing, cigarette smoking roots? I thought Mickey's wild days were behind him.
Top
User avatar
chaychay102royal
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: California
Contact:
Contact chaychay102royal

Post by chaychay102royal »

orestes. wrote:
KinOO wrote: i was thinking again to this storyline and was so disgusted!! Come On, Cinderella! A pure classic masterpiece, has to sold next to a "movie" that will make the StepMother go BACK IN TIME??? man this is a PURE outrage to the essence of the original movie...

No it can't be, it HAS to be an april fool!
Maybe she'll go back in time and erase the events of the sequel. :p
:lol: I personally think that's a great idea, but Disney would probably either say: :jawdrop: or :headshake: because they're silly.
Top
User avatar
chaychay102royal
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: California
Contact:
Contact chaychay102royal

Post by chaychay102royal »

Little Red Henski wrote:So are they really going to bring Mickey back to his date raping, liquor drinking, Blackface wearing, cigarette smoking roots? I thought Mickey's wild days were behind him.
What???

Can you explain these comments? Since when did Mickey have "wild days"?
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Main Disney”