Jonathan Taylor Thomas
He was like the greatest in TLK and Home Improvement. WHo I'm not too sure of is the girl who played young Nala. She wasn't in too much stuff. Only like one movie.
Number 1 Lady and the Tramp 2 fan what can I say?
Scamp: I just want want to be somewhere where I can be wild and free.
Angel: You got your own style don't you Tender Foot?
Scamp: I just want want to be somewhere where I can be wild and free.
Angel: You got your own style don't you Tender Foot?
jtt on home improvement
do any of u guys watch home improvement everyday?
Re: jtt on home improvement
Only when I can.chick588 wrote:do any of u guys watch home improvement everyday?

It shows at 6:30 p.m. and then 11:30 p.m. here!

We have the Season 1 Box set...but it's not open.

It doesn't need to be...since we always see HI on the T.V.!
It's just weird seeing the kids really young at 6:30 and at 11:30, they're in high school.


jtt on home improvement
yea. here, we see HI at 5:30pm. yup.
~lisa~
~lisa~
- Prince Eric
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:27 am
Rotten Tomatoes doesn't give ratings. They compile all the national reviews for a title and give it a percent rating in terms of positive reviews. Percent ratings above 60 percent are considered fresh and those below are considered rotten. It's an important tool for those of us who want to see movies that matter. I have never seen those movies in full, and I don't plan to. Trust me, I don't think I'll lose any sleep if I never get to watch Man of the House.awallaceunc wrote:I never check Rotten Tomatoes, and could care less what their ratings are, to be honest. I really like all the aforementioned movies, and of course I don't like any of them less because the have low ratings, you know what I mean?Mr. Toad wrote: Man of the House, Tom & Huck and I'll be home for Christmas were all terrible with rotten tomato ratings of 13,25 and 18 percent respectively. Now I am not saying critics are the be all and end all. But those ratings absolutely suck. I have to agree with the critics on all three. Man of the House was among the worst five movies I have ever seen.
-Aaron

The Top 10 Films of 2005:
1) Brokeback Mountain 2) The Squid and the Whale 3) Me And You And Everyone We Know 4) The New World 5) A History of Violence 6) Match Point 7) Munich 8.) Crash 9) Wallace and Gromit 10) Pride & Prejudice
1) Brokeback Mountain 2) The Squid and the Whale 3) Me And You And Everyone We Know 4) The New World 5) A History of Violence 6) Match Point 7) Munich 8.) Crash 9) Wallace and Gromit 10) Pride & Prejudice
-
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4360
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: Victoria, BC
- Contact:
[quote="Prince Eric"[
Rotten Tomatoes doesn't give ratings. They compile all the national reviews for a title and give it a percent rating in terms of positive review:[/quote]
Huh Eric? They dont give ratings they give percent ratings? Whats the difference?
Rotten Tomatoes doesn't give ratings. They compile all the national reviews for a title and give it a percent rating in terms of positive review:[/quote]
Huh Eric? They dont give ratings they give percent ratings? Whats the difference?
Disneyland Trips - 07/77, 07/80, 07/83, 05/92, 05/96, 05/97, 06/00, 11/00, 02/02, 06/02, 11/02, 04/06, 01/07, 07/07, 11/07,11/08, 07/09
Disneyworld Trips - 01/05
Disney Cruise - 01/05
Six Flags DK - 03/09, 05/09. 06/09, 07/09
Disneyworld Trips - 01/05
Disney Cruise - 01/05
Six Flags DK - 03/09, 05/09. 06/09, 07/09
OMG.... you people actually remember all that...lol. RK, there's no need to put it in such a small size, I'm not going to attack you.RJKD23 wrote:Guys, we're getting off topic.
We're talking about Jonathan Taylor Thomas!
Not about <a href="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/vie ... >[b]Finest Chick[/b]</a> or <a href="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/vie ... lolopimp's[/b] computer</a> being used by other users from California (finest chick)...even though he's from New Jersey.
*laughs out loud in her most sarcastic tone*Mr. Toad and Dan05 are hilarious.
just kidding!
- Prince Eric
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:27 am
Huh Eric? They dont give ratings they give percent ratings? Whats the difference?[/quote]Mr. Toad wrote:[quote="Prince Eric"[
Rotten Tomatoes doesn't give ratings. They compile all the national reviews for a title and give it a percent rating in terms of positive review:
Rotten Tomatoes doesn't give movies a rating themselves. It's based on the percent of positive reviews from national papers/online journals.

The Top 10 Films of 2005:
1) Brokeback Mountain 2) The Squid and the Whale 3) Me And You And Everyone We Know 4) The New World 5) A History of Violence 6) Match Point 7) Munich 8.) Crash 9) Wallace and Gromit 10) Pride & Prejudice
1) Brokeback Mountain 2) The Squid and the Whale 3) Me And You And Everyone We Know 4) The New World 5) A History of Violence 6) Match Point 7) Munich 8.) Crash 9) Wallace and Gromit 10) Pride & Prejudice
- Disney Guru
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3294
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 5:31 pm
- Location: Utah
Hi
Sure the guy was great in the early 90's, but his acting has gone down hill. I mean hardly anybody wants him, I mean with kid Actors when you are cute they want ya, but when you grow up they drop ya, in most cases. Sad but true
"I have this tremendous energy. I just loved and love life. I love it today. I never want to die."
~Jayne Meadows Allen~
~Jayne Meadows Allen~
The <i>Man of the House</i> rating on Rotten Tomatoes is based on a whopping total of 4 reviews, one of which is actually readable and is a total of 5 sentences long. For everyone else, it's a matter of putting a <img src="http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images ... /fresh.gif"> or <img src="http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images ... rotten.gif"> and I think a graphic of a tomato or an asterisk doesn't say a whole lot.
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
- DaveWadding
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2236
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:11 pm
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
- AwallaceUNC
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 9439
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 1:00 am
- Contact:
Yeah, I get how it works. I didn't mean that they assign ratings themselves, but rather that that's where you'd find the percentages of reviews. As far as it being an important tool, I stick with trailers, plot summaries, cast & crew, and the advice of people I know and/or trust when it comes to films, not the overall spectrum of reviewers out there who I think almost exclusively assess films on arbitrary and unfair criteria. That's just my bias, though. There's certainly no pressure on you to watch Man of the House if you don't want to.Prince Eric wrote:Rotten Tomatoes doesn't give ratings. They compile all the national reviews for a title and give it a percent rating in terms of positive reviews. Percent ratings above 60 percent are considered fresh and those below are considered rotten. It's an important tool for those of us who want to see movies that matter. I have never seen those movies in full, and I don't plan to. Trust me, I don't think I'll lose any sleep if I never get to watch Man of the House.awallaceunc wrote: I never check Rotten Tomatoes, and could care less what their ratings are, to be honest. I really like all the aforementioned movies, and of course I don't like any of them less because the have low ratings, you know what I mean?
-Aaron

-Aaron
• Author of Hocus Pocus in Focus: The Thinking Fan's Guide to Disney's Halloween Classic
and The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom (Epcot coming soon)
• Host of Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Pod, the longest-running Disney podcast
• Entertainment Writer & Moderator at DVDizzy.com
• Twitter - @aaronspod
and The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom (Epcot coming soon)
• Host of Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Pod, the longest-running Disney podcast
• Entertainment Writer & Moderator at DVDizzy.com
• Twitter - @aaronspod
- Prince Eric
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1235
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:27 am
This is due to the fact that Rotten Tomatoes doesn't have access to all reviews or the reviews have long since been taking off the internet. Therefore, if it was positive, the put a tomato. If it was negative, they put a green splat.Luke wrote:The <i>Man of the House</i> rating on Rotten Tomatoes is based on a whopping total of 4 reviews, one of which is actually readable and is a total of 5 sentences long. For everyone else, it's a matter of putting a <img src="http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images ... /fresh.gif"> or <img src="http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images ... rotten.gif"> and I think a graphic of a tomato or an asterisk doesn't say a whole lot.
Also, I agree that I'm not the type of person to change my opinion to find the majority of critics. Some very prominent critics have been known to get some movies misunderstood, but their opinions should not be taken less seriously. Again, it goes to preference. I need something with more than laugh value.

The Top 10 Films of 2005:
1) Brokeback Mountain 2) The Squid and the Whale 3) Me And You And Everyone We Know 4) The New World 5) A History of Violence 6) Match Point 7) Munich 8.) Crash 9) Wallace and Gromit 10) Pride & Prejudice
1) Brokeback Mountain 2) The Squid and the Whale 3) Me And You And Everyone We Know 4) The New World 5) A History of Violence 6) Match Point 7) Munich 8.) Crash 9) Wallace and Gromit 10) Pride & Prejudice