Disney Panics over "Disney War"

Any topic that doesn't fit elsewhere.
Post Reply
User avatar
AwallaceUNC
Signature Collection
Posts: 9439
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 1:00 am
Contact:

Disney Panics over "Disney War"

Post by AwallaceUNC »

Very interesting article out today from the New York Post:
MOUSE TROUBLE

By TIM ARANGO
PHOTO BOB IGER and MICHAEL EISNER

Email Archives
Print Reprint

January 28, 2005 -- Disney management is so distraught over damaging revelations in a book on CEO Michael Eisner that the public relations head offered to resign, The Post has learned.

Sources say Disney obtained several chapters of James B. Stewart's soon-to-be published book "Disney War" last week, and immediately put their lawyers and spinmeisters into overdrive to try to get Stewart to soften the portions most damaging to Eisner and his top deputy, Bob Iger.

Sources say the publisher, Simon & Schuster, has no idea how the Mouse House was able to obtain an advance copy of "Disney War," and is trying to find out how it was leaked.

A spokeswoman for Simon & Schuster declined to comment beyond saying, "The book will speak for itself when it's published."

The material was believed to be so damaging to Eisner that public relations exec Zenia Mucha offered to resign — an offer that Eisner refused. Sources said the move was spurred by the anticipated negative public relations, and that as department head she felt she should take the fall. Both top executives cooperated with Stewart on the book.

Mucha said she "can't confirm or deny" that she got an unauthorized copy, adding, "I went through a normal fact-checking process."

She declined to comment on whether she offered to resign from Disney.

The hard-charging Mucha — known for her aggressive p.r. tactics — was formerly an adviser to New York Gov. George Pataki.

The only public glimpse thus far of Stewart's exposé is an excerpt this month in The New Yorker, which detailed the ill-fated relationship between Eisner and his ex-No. 2, Michael Ovitz, the subject of a high-profile shareholder lawsuit.

"Disney War" is set to hit store shelves March 7. Stewart, a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, also wrote the Wall Street classic, "Den Of Thieves."

Iger, Eisner's preferred successor, stands to suffer even more from any negative portrayals since his boss has agreed to resign in September 2006.

This partly explains Disney management's "overly harsh reaction," according to one source.

While Disney's board of directors has promised to conduct an independent search for Eisner's successor — it has hired search firm Heidrick & Struggles — management has been waging a pro-Iger campaign, while the board has yet to seek out any outside candidates. The next chief is expected to be named by June.

"I think the danger for Iger is that [management is] controlling the process and not the board," said one industry source close to Disney.

The perception that a wide-ranging search is not being conducted could ignite further outrage from disgruntled shareholders, as well as Stanley Gold and Roy Disney, the former board members who resigned in late 2003 to campaign for Eisner's ouster.

Disney and Gold largely succeeded in their efforts, as Eisner resigned his chairmanship last March and later announced he would not continue on as CEO beyond the terms of his contract.
Source: http://www.nypost.com/business/38925.htm

Anybody pre-ordered the new book? I'm strongly considering it. SaveDisney.com should have a field day with this. :)

-Aaron
• Author of Hocus Pocus in Focus: The Thinking Fan's Guide to Disney's Halloween Classic
and The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom (Epcot coming soon)
• Host of Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Pod, the longest-running Disney podcast
• Entertainment Writer & Moderator at DVDizzy.com
• Twitter - @aaronspod
User avatar
Disney-Fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:59 am
Location: Where it's flat and immense and the heat is intense
Contact:

Post by Disney-Fan »

Very interesting.

In my opinion Iger should NOT be Disney's next CEO. I'm hoping for a CEO that'll revive Disney's traditional animation department.
User avatar
AwallaceUNC
Signature Collection
Posts: 9439
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 1:00 am
Contact:

Post by AwallaceUNC »

Disney War was rushed due to press leaks and was released to book stores this week. Apparently, it's selling like crazy.
DisneyWar' rushed to stores
S&S speeds release of Mouse House tell-all

By JONATHAN BING, PAMELA MCCLINTOCK

'DisneyWar'

"DisneyWar," James B. Stewart's expose of Michael Eisner's 20-year tenure at Disney, arrived in bookstores Wednesday -- three weeks ahead of schedule.

Publisher Simon & Schuster, which had sought to preserve a publicity campaign tied to the original release date of March 7, decided earlier this week to accelerate publication.

Several Disney executives and reporters had seen early drafts of the manuscript, which paints a decidedly unflattering picture of Eisner's time atop the Mouse HouseMouse House.

The leaks generated so much publicity for "DisneyWar" that industry insiders have begun to speculate whether the accelerated schedule was an elaborately choreographed PR stunt.

Sources at Simon & Schuster denied the publisher was behind the leaks. "We would never plan a campaign like this," said S&S spokeswoman Rachel Nagler, adding that breaking a publication date can lead to plenty of confusion, particularly with regard to book reviews and TV appearances timed to the release of the book.

The publisher sent copies of "DisneyWar" to most media outlets on Wednesday and Thursday, receiving splashy coverage from the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times on Thursday. The Journal published an extensive excerpt; the Times ran on the front page of the Arts section a long, lukewarm review comparing the book to "a PowerPoint boardroom presentation" and an analysis of Stewart's findings on the front page of Business Day.

Shelves emptied

Some Los Angeles bookstores sold their stock of "DisneyWar" in one day, including Dutton's locations in Brent wood and Beverly Hills, as well as Barnes & Noble at the Grove. Each bookstore got roughly 80 copies and has already put in a new order for the weekend.

"I wish we had more of them. We got some Wednesday and sold out within an hour," Dutton's general manager Ed Conklin said. "We got more in today, which also sold within an hour.

"We knew it would be a big book, but we had no idea it would be this big," Conklin said. "Obviously, this is an industry town. People were buying multiple copies."

Barnes & Noble in New York's Union Square said Thursday the book was in the store but not yet on display.

Simon & Schuster spokeswoman Victoria Meyers said the crash publication schedule was motivated by rising demand from retailers. "Accounts were clamoring for it. It was really to meet the interest we felt was there among consumers as well as our customers."

Shareholders interested

Rising interest in the book can be attributed in part to the Disney shareholders meeting, which gets under way this morning at the Minneapolis Convention Center.

Stewart's saga of corporate squabbles and mismanagement could be a point of reference during the shareholders' question period in Minneapolis. The Barnes & Noble near the Convention Center did not have the book in stock on Thursday, but booksellers said numerous people have come there looking for it.

Stewart, who was skedded to appear for an exclusive interview on NBC's "Today" in early March, began scrambling this week to revise his promotional schedule. He's now expected to appear on "Today" next Tuesday and Wednesday.

In the past, publishers have threatened legal action against news organizations that ran early excerpts of embargoed books. Simon & Schuster threatened to slap the AP with a lawsuit after it published juicy tidbits of Sen. Hillary Clinton's memoir in 2003.

The leaks of "DisneyWar" demonstrate that reporters have grown more intrepid about unearthing copies of embargoed books -- and that the attendant publicity is a useful marketing gimmick.

"It's very difficult to keep a book under strict embargo," an exec at a rival publishing house said Thursday. "Publishers have become more nimble and adept at accelerating publication dates. And some embargoes are wink-wink nudge-nudge."

Date in print: Fri., Feb. 11, 2005, Los Angeles
Source: http://www.variety.com/article/VR111791 ... =1&s=h&p=0 (linked from The Drudge Report)
• Author of Hocus Pocus in Focus: The Thinking Fan's Guide to Disney's Halloween Classic
and The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom (Epcot coming soon)
• Host of Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Pod, the longest-running Disney podcast
• Entertainment Writer & Moderator at DVDizzy.com
• Twitter - @aaronspod
Key
Special Edition
Posts: 891
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:53 am
Location: SoCal
Contact:

Post by Key »

I was reading reviews on http://www.amazon.com and this one fellow who lives in Burbank said that when he went to buy a copy, one of the peeps working there said that the people from Disney had come and bought out the stock of books and then... returned them.

What in the world was that about?
Wherever. Whatever. Have a nice day.
User avatar
Disney Guru
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3294
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 5:31 pm
Location: Utah

Hi

Post by Disney Guru »

I think I might just buy that book. It would be an interesting read.
"I have this tremendous energy. I just loved and love life. I love it today. I never want to die."
~Jayne Meadows Allen~
orestes.

Post by orestes. »

Here's an interesting article from IMDB yesterday...

Iger and Eisner Would Have Lost 'Lost'


According to the upcoming DisneyWar book by James Stewart, both Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Robert Iger were dubious that the series Lost, which had been championed by ABC Entertainment Television Group Chairman Lloyd Braun, would draw an audience. Iger originally called the series "a waste of time," adding, "It might work as a miniseries, but not as a series." According to the book, Braun defied Iger's "clear invitation" to kill it. Later Eisner asked Braun, "What have you picked up?" When he described Lost, Eisner reportedly frowned, then said, "That's never going to work." Even after its successful premiere (and after Braun had been fired), Lost continued to be damned by Eisner, who told Stewart, "Lost is terrible. ... The pilot was two hours; it was broken into two one-hour episodes. Then the show goes off a cliff. There's no more plane crash! Who cares about these people on a desert island?" Lost is currently ABC's second most popular TV series, behind Desperate Housewives. On Wednesday, it dominated the 8:00 p.m. hour, scoring an 11.6 rating and an 18 share, well above second-place CBS's 7.3/11 (60 Minutes Wednesday).


I love that show but it shows how much they know. :P
orestes.

Post by orestes. »

Oh and more cluelessness from IMDB...

Eisner Was Wrong About 'Nemo' Too, Says Book


Michael Eisner predicted in writing that Pixar's Finding Nemo would break the computer animation studio's string of hits, the upcoming James Stewart book DisneyWar reveals, according to the New York Daily News. The News revealed that latest tidbit from the highly anticipated book one day after the New York Times disclosed that Eisner had written off the potential of Lost, which, as it turned out, became one of ABC's biggest hits this season. Likewise, Finding Nemo earned close to $1 billion for the studio. The book cites a memo that Eisner wrote to the Disney board after he saw Nemo a second time. "This will be a reality check for those guys [Pixar]. ... It's OK, but nowhere near as good as their previous films. Of course, they think it's great. Trust me, it's not, but it will open." During a conference call with analysts following the release of Pixar's fourth-quarter results, Pixar chief Steve Jobs called Eisner a "loose cannon"
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

Right, I suppose I'll be labeled a brainless Eisner supporter, but I agree 100% with Eisner. If Nemo was shown to me, uncomplete or complete, I would predict it would do rather poorly at the box office, because its just the same of Pixar formula. Things get old, you know, and too me, Pixar's "Buddy movie" got old before Nemo.

Lets Examine Nemo in relation to other Pixar films:

Mismatched Buddies See also Toy Story/Monsters Inc (although Sully and Mike aren't that mis-matched to be honest)

Rescue Quest See also Toy Story/Monsters Inc

Child "kidnapped" to be saved see also Monsters Inc

"Delusional" Character who hampers Quest (Dory with her short-term memoary loss) See Toy Story (Buzz thinks he's "real")

"Scary" Group of characters who turn out to be OK (The Fish Tank gang) - See the Toys in Sid's Room in Toy Story

Scary Kid who abuses the main characters (but unknowingly) Darla at the Dentist (See Sid in Toy Story)

Add to this, the fact that the film is so episodic it could be shown as a series of 5 minute shorts and you can say I wasn't impressed.

As for Eisner missing the importance of some TV series, it happens to everyone. Nobody can be 100% in sync with the population. Things are passed over all the time, by Studios and also by the public themselves. Look at Sienfeld. It may not have been passed over, but nobody had any conviction it would work, and one of the most popular episodes (The waiting at the Restaurant) was held back because the management thought it would make people switch-off in their millions. Star Trek was run into the ground and cancelled becuase nobody at the TV station could care less about it at the time. Warners cancelled Angel, even though it was their highest rated program in the critical 15-35 year old male demographic (and they keep renewing Charmed for some odd reason :roll: )

Films too are passed from studio to studio. Nobody wanted to make The Lord of the Rings films, until New Line had the guts to do so. It's just life. You could blame Eisner for that too, being as Miramax were actively involved in the films at one point (and the Wienstiens are still on the closing credits).

Arguing that Eisner has to go because he potentially could have stopped some popular programs is scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
DDMAN26
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:51 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Post by DDMAN26 »

James Stewart author of Disney War appeared on the O'Reilly Factor. He was the last interview segment.
Most Anticpated: Watchmen Terminator Salvation Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Disney/Pixar Breakup

http://www.fool.com/news/commentary/200 ... 022403.htm

It's all so childish. And it's just as much Jobs and Eisner.
This is all about the breakdown of the personal relationship between Eisner and Steve Jobs. What I discovered is that the single incident that pushed Steve Jobs over the edge was when he believed, and I think he is right, that Eisner lied to him about blasting Apple Computer in congressional testimony. It is a pretty remarkable story, really, because Eisner went before Congress to talk about digital piracy, and in his unscripted comments, he ended up denouncing the big company that was responsible for the rip, mix, and burn advertising campaign. Of course this was Apple Computer, whose chairman happens to be Steve Jobs, also the chairman of Pixar.
So of talking about Digital Piracy - which, although I think is vastly overrated by the studios, it is a concern - Eisner wasn't supposed to commment on national adverts encouraging people to burn copies of music and films? Of course he's going to say something. It's why he was there?
Later, as Steve Jobs put it, that was really the straw that broke the camel's back, and he said, "How can I be a partner with someone like this?"
:? What did he expect? Does Jobs expect other studio distributors who he signs up with to have a different point-of-view?
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
ichabod
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4676
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:29 am
Location: The place where they didn't build EuroDisney
Contact:

Post by ichabod »

I think people are over reacting about Eisner. So he said that Finding Nemo and Lost wouldn't work! TV shows, films, songs and whatever are shown to executives from all companies every day. And it's true that some that are initially rejected or told that they won't work all the time!It's not just Eisner who is doing this! However these are the points that are prayed upon when it's "badmouth Eisner" time! And hey we all know that making someone out to look like a complete prat is a much better read than saying how great someone/thing is!

I'm not trying to say Eisner has never made a bad decision because there are things which I feel we all regret! I think it's fair to say that everyone was horrified when the 2d animation studio was closed, and no one more than I. but at the end of the day it has to be looked at from a business point of view! A traditional animated film on average has a budget of about $100,000,000+, that's the region where Treasure Planet, Brother Bear and Home on the Range were at. Whereas a CGI film like Shark Tale had a budget of $40,000,000. That's a big difference and at this current stage in history it's undeniable that people see CGI as superior to 2D. I have literally overherad people talking about Finding Nemo and Ice age and talking about what their favourite animated films are and when I say "What about Treasure Planet or Brother Bear?" their responses are "Yeah but they are different, they are for children!". So even though I was saddened I believe it was a logical decision to give 2D a rest for a while, I do admit though that complete closure was a bit of an overreaction.

It's true that Eisner has upset many with some decisions, myself included, but I think something that is almost always overlooked is how much good Eisner has done! In the early 1980s the Walt Disney compnay was really turned around, Eisner personally got really involved with some the stories like The Great Mouse Detective and really gave the company a kick up the bum, and it was this which gave the surge for the films which were released during Disney's renaissance!

Like I said, people and newspaper reports and books are never going to be written solely to just say "Look what Eisner's done, isn't he great". We all know what is going to sell more copies, A gritty story where Eisner is made to look like the tyrant who took over Walt's legacy and turned it into a crumbling empire!
orestes.

Post by orestes. »

As I've said before I would have thought someone like Eisner would be a better judge to see what has potential and what does not.

Sure Eisner started out good but I think over time he lost his "Disney magic" and now they need someone new and fresh to take his place.
MutantEnemy
Special Edition
Posts: 617
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:46 pm
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Contact:

Post by MutantEnemy »

I actually bought the book and am into the secong half of the book called "Disenchanted Kingdom", I LOVE THIS BOOK it is like being in a time machine, taken back to 1984 and watching history as it happens, also remembering the way you felt about certain things in disney history, so good.
sqrt[-1]
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 3:24 am

Book : "Disney War"

Post by sqrt[-1] »

Just noticed this: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684809931/ref=pd_sxp_f/103-5815433-8423046

And wondered if anyone here has read it. (Published in Feb, may have alreay been discussed)
User avatar
Son of the Morning
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 1:46 pm
Contact:

Post by Son of the Morning »

Actually, I'm reading that book now, and I'm really blown away by how fascinating and engrossing a read it is: I sure as hell didn't expect that from a corporate expose, even if it <i>is</i> The Walt Disney Company. Granted, I'm only about 1/3 of the way through it, but I'm finding it one of the most enjoyable books I've read this year.
User avatar
Pasta67
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1426
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: On The Forums... Duh!

Post by Pasta67 »

I really am interested about this book. I might get it, but first, I have to finish reading "The Magic Behind the Voices: A Who's Who of Cartoon Voice Actors". That's also quite an enjoyable read.
- John
Timon/Pumbaa fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3675
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by Timon/Pumbaa fan »

Meh I have no interest reading this book. I read parts of it on Save Disney.com and none of it is impressive. The internet has just as much information as this book!
User avatar
Raydawggie
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:21 pm

Post by Raydawggie »

DisneyFan 2000 wrote:Very interesting.

In my opinion Iger should NOT be Disney's next CEO. I'm hoping for a CEO that'll revive Disney's traditional animation department.
Word. They need to do something, because without Pixar, I don't know if they can remain successful.
Timon/Pumbaa fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3675
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by Timon/Pumbaa fan »

Raydawggie wrote:
DisneyFan 2000 wrote:Very interesting.

In my opinion Iger should NOT be Disney's next CEO. I'm hoping for a CEO that'll revive Disney's traditional animation department.
Word. They need to do something, because without Pixar, I don't know if they can remain successful.
Well I don't find that statement true at all. Sure Pixar have been given them alot of successes! But it's not like Disney hasn't has a few successes on their own. Look at Jerry Bruckheimer, he's given Disney a few hits like Pirates of the Carribean and National Treasure. In fact both of those films have sequels in the works since both were so popular. Also I think ABC is starting to get popular again. I mean Desperate Housewives is the third most popular t.v. show on air I can think of(The overrated American Idol is one of them and C.S.I which would've been Disney's in the first place!). Also never underestimate the power of the theme parks. With Disneyland's 50th anniversary kicking off, I think people have forgotten all about terrorist  attacks and are going to Disneyland!

And let's not forget, even though Pixar brings Disney great box office scores and great DVD scores, they also brought Disney alot of lawsuits! I mean I can think of three lawsuits that have been filed for Pixar. Even though none of them really went into court, they tend to drop Pixar's stock.

So even though Disney won't quite do as well without Pixar, I think Disney has some tricks up their sleeves from keeping Disney from absolute failure!
Last edited by Timon/Pumbaa fan on Sun Jun 26, 2005 3:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Raydawggie
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:21 pm

Post by Raydawggie »

Timon/Pumba fan wrote:
Raydawggie wrote: Word. They need to do something, because without Pixar, I don't know if they can remain successful.
Well I don't find that statement true at all. Sure Pixar have been given them alot of successes! But it's not like Disney hasn't has a few successes on their own. Look at Jerry Bruckheimer, he's given Disney a few hits like Pirates of the Carribean and National Treasure. In fact both of those films have sequels in the works since both were so popular. Also I think ABC is starting to get popular again. I mean Desperate Housewives is the third most popular t.v. show on air I can think of(The overrated American Idol is one of them and C.S.I which would've been Disney's in the first place!). Also never underestimate the power of the theme parks. With Disneyland's 50th anniversary kicking off, I think people have forgotten all about terrorist  attacks and are going to Disneyland!

And let's not forget, even though Pixar brings Disney great box office scores and great DVD scores, they also brough Disney alot of lawsuits! I mean I can think of three lawsuits that have been filed for Pixar. Even though none of them really went into court, they tend to drop Pixar's stock.

So even though Disney won't quite do as well without Pixar, I think Disney has some trick up their sleeves from keeping Disney from absolute failure!
True, but when I say Disney, what I really mean is their animation division. Disney has a lot of other ways to make money, but they're defined by their animation, and I'm not sure about how successful their future movies are going to be. Guess we'll have to wait and see how Chicken Little does.
Post Reply