Do you have a widescreen TV?

Any topic that doesn't fit elsewhere.
User avatar
Evil Genie Jafar
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1697
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:41 pm
Location: Humacao, Puerto Rico; there's more to PR than San Juan!

Do you have a widescreen TV?

Post by Evil Genie Jafar »

... and how does Disney movies look there?

I'm dying to get one. :( :evil:

I saw one at Sears for a bit more than $600.... if only I could make my family buy it.

At least I have a home theater... but.... I want a widescreen TV!! Meanwhile I have a flat screen one which make movies look very prsitine.
Image

"You're only second rate!"
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

Well, the Reader family must be unique. We're in the UK and we don't have a widescreen television. [gasp].

You don't really need one if your screen is big enough. We can do a vertical squeeze if we want to get the higher resolution of a widescreen enhanced disc.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
ThiagoPE
The Lion King
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 8:25 am
Location: SBRF - Recife/PE
Contact:

Post by ThiagoPE »

i don't have a widescreen tv, but my tv have a function that simulate the widescreen tv, so i still prefer my tv then an wide tv.
User avatar
RJKD23
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3314
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:45 pm

Post by RJKD23 »

I have a widescreen HDTV which has the settings of...

- normal (for Full screen formats, so there's black spaces on the left and right side of the picture :roll:)

- panorma (which I usually use if the format is full screen, this makes the picture fill the screen in a widescreen format without stretching out the pictures or making them look distorted. i guess this is why i wasn't complaning when i bought RoK and KoT! :lol:. And this is also the setting when I watch the T.V. shows on DVD (freakin full frame....:P))

- wide (for widescreen versions...obviously :P)

I'm not really a fan of full screen T.V. and full screen format :oops:
Evil Genie Jafar wrote:... and how does Disney movies look there?
I like the picture a lot :D. with widescreen t.v.'s, there's not so much black space on the top and bottom as opposed to a full screen t.v. (I mainly get the widescreen version for DVDs). and i believe you see more!...or at least a bigger, better picture on widescreen to widescreen compared to widescreen picture on full screen t.v.
2099net wrote:We can do a vertical squeeze if we want to get the higher resolution of a widescreen enhanced disc.
That still distorts the picture. :(

well, that's my share on widescreen. :)
Image R[APRIL.23]K: High School Sweethearts
User avatar
2099net
Signature Collection
Posts: 9421
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by 2099net »

RJKD23 wrote:
2099net wrote:We can do a vertical squeeze if we want to get the higher resolution of a widescreen enhanced disc.
That still distorts the picture. :(

well, that's my share on widescreen. :)
Not on our TV. It literally ups the horizontal line resolution, meaning nothing is lost. The top and bottom of the picture are just empty black lines.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
User avatar
Evil Genie Jafar
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1697
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:41 pm
Location: Humacao, Puerto Rico; there's more to PR than San Juan!

Post by Evil Genie Jafar »

RJKD23 wrote:I have a widescreen HDTV which has the settings of...
That's funny, my TV doesn't have those options but the DVD player does.

So how am I suppose to set it when I get my WS TV?

In 4x3 Standard... the movie looks like regular wide

In 4x3 Letterbox the image looks a little more wide

And in 16x9 wide it stretches the image... it almost looks full screen... is this all right? ; Actually it looks almost the same but the black bars are extremely thin. I checked with a particular scene to see if it looses something but I didn't see any loss. (and since my TV has a flat screen) It looks great
Image

"You're only second rate!"
User avatar
AwallaceUNC
Signature Collection
Posts: 9439
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 1:00 am
Contact:

Post by AwallaceUNC »

Don't put your DVD setting on widescreen if your TV is 4:3. I haven't tried it but I believe that will tell the DVD player that your TV is 16:9 and you won't see the black bars, but you won't see all of the picture, either. Am I right here?

I have a widescreen HD-TV and a widescreen Apple monitor. Disney flicks with proper treatment look incredible on them, as do any well-presented movies.

-Aaron
• Author of Hocus Pocus in Focus: The Thinking Fan's Guide to Disney's Halloween Classic
and The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom (Epcot coming soon)
• Host of Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Pod, the longest-running Disney podcast
• Entertainment Writer & Moderator at DVDizzy.com
• Twitter - @aaronspod
User avatar
Evil Genie Jafar
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1697
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:41 pm
Location: Humacao, Puerto Rico; there's more to PR than San Juan!

Post by Evil Genie Jafar »

awallaceunc wrote:Don't put your DVD setting on widescreen if your TV is 4:3. I haven't tried it but I believe that will tell the DVD player that your TV is 16:9 and you won't see the black bars, but you won't see all of the picture, either. Am I right here?
Well, I just took a picture of the same scene in the different settings and they look exactly the same. There's no loss at the sides or at the top/bottom.

--------------------------


I guess it varies from movie to movie. With Star Wars Episode 1 there was no loss. With Aladdin it made it look full screen, but in letterbox it looked the same way Star Wars did; more movie on screen without loss.

Or it could be that Episode I didn't have a letterbox option so selecting wide on the DVD player made that function.
Image

"You're only second rate!"
orestes.

Post by orestes. »

No but I'm about to buy one since we lost our 52 inch TV recently and the next bigest one is about to go.

The cheapest, biggest and best I can find is for $700 so I'm considering that. I must admit though I don't know enough about widescreen tvs. I thought it was all pretty simple until I got this lecture from someone whose uncle owned one and how bad it could be.

I think I'll read up on it myself.
Key
Special Edition
Posts: 891
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:53 am
Location: SoCal
Contact:

Post by Key »

awallaceunc wrote:Don't put your DVD setting on widescreen if your TV is 4:3. I haven't tried it but I believe that will tell the DVD player that your TV is 16:9 and you won't see the black bars, but you won't see all of the picture, either. Am I right here?
Yeah, you're right. My friend's DVD had been automatically set to 16:9 when her TV is 4:3 so all her widescreen DVDs came out as fullscreen and we didn't know wtf was going on. Then I figured it out and changed her DVD setting for her.

So faking a 16:9 on a 4:3 TV is actually worse than pan & scan as it only zooms in to the center of the picture and doesn't even attempt to focus on the action.


[EDIT: O nooo, I have no widescreen TV... yet.]
Last edited by Key on Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wherever. Whatever. Have a nice day.
User avatar
Just Myself
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3552
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: Pawnee, IN
Contact:

Post by Just Myself »

I have one, and let me tell you, anything looks good on there! :D :D :thumb:
Cheers,
JM :thumb:
User avatar
Disneykid
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 9:10 am
Location: Wonderland

Post by Disneykid »

We've got a 65 inch Hitachi HDTV, and it's gorgeous. Disney movies look absolutely splendid on it. Even the compression artifact-filled Beauty and the Beast still looks great. The TV has the following pictures modes:

4x3 standard (1.33:1 films shown in their true format with gaps on the sides)
4x3 expanded (this slices off only a slither of picture on the top and bottom and stretches only a bit of the sides, therefore making the picture look like widescreen)
4x3 zoom (the top and bottom are completely cropped off)
4x3 zoom 2 (even more)
16x9 standard (anamorphic films shown in their true format, 1.33:1 films are stretched)
16x9 zoom (anamorphic films have the top and bottom cropped off, 1.33:1 films are stretched and then cropped)

It also has a picture to picture mode and a screencap feature (which is kind of useless because you take the screencap, it's there, and then you exit. This isn't a computer, so you can't print it out or save it, but I guess it's neat to have, anyway). I love my HDTV. :D
User avatar
RJKD23
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3314
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:45 pm

Post by RJKD23 »

Evil Genie Jafar wrote:
RJKD23 wrote:I have a widescreen HDTV which has the settings of...
That's funny, my TV doesn't have those options but the DVD player does.

So how am I suppose to set it when I get my WS TV?

In 4x3 Standard... the movie looks like regular wide

In 4x3 Letterbox the image looks a little more wide

And in 16x9 wide it stretches the image... it almost looks full screen... is this all right? ; Actually it looks almost the same but the black bars are extremely thin. I checked with a particular scene to see if it looses something but I didn't see any loss. (and since my TV has a flat screen) It looks great
actually, it has 5 settings: normal, panorama, widescreen, zoom 1, and zoom 2.

on the t.v. remote, it's button is Aspect.

flat screens are best too :thumb: :D
Image R[APRIL.23]K: High School Sweethearts
orestes.

Post by orestes. »

This is the television I'm considering getting. I want a larger TV but if I spent anymore.... well it wouldn't be smart of me. :P

http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetai ... ptid=21344

So there it is. Now if anyone wants to check it out and tell me what you think.
User avatar
deathie mouse
Ultraviolet Edition
Posts: 1391
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 1:12 am
Location: Alea jacta est

4:3, 16:9, widescreens,letterbox, pillarbox, shoebox, redsox

Post by deathie mouse »

Ahhhhhhhhhhh you're all so confusing aaahh

my eyes they distooooorttttttt


:)


This subject is very connvoluted and difficult to explain in all of it's variables (just see how mixed up MGM consumers <a href="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/vie ... 55">are</a> :lol: )
I started to make a post twice and gave up in the middle of them. Too many variables.

Widescreen TVs theoretically are better cus:

A: Widescreen movies are taller on them (on 4:3 displays they are shrunk) while non widescreen movies and TV programs are still the same old height (comparatively). It's called the equal screen height principle. (Yes I know Scope type movies are still shrunk somewhat with their letterbozed black bars on 16:9 displays. That's why we need Ultra Wide 21:9 displays :P)

B: 16:9 coded widescreen DVDs can be shown with their full vertical resolution. That's what the 16:9 coding is for. Widescreen movies coded for 16:9 have 33% more resolution than the equivalent "letterboxed" or open matted 4:3 versions., cus those 4:3 versions ar shrunk to fit the squarer screen. (The open matted versions just show up to 33% more image that's not meant to be seen but the central widescreen rectangle image area meant to be seen is still shrunk :P)

On 4:3 TVs, 16:9 coded widescreen discs loose that extra 33% resolution when the DVD player throws it away to shrink the image to fit it on the 4:3 display* so there they look equivalent to regular 4:3 letterboxed discs

*(unless you have a 4:3 display with the vertical squeeze feature that James and Thiago have which squeezes the full 480 (or 576 PAL) pixels into shape without throwing part of them away)

If you don't have a widescreen display you can get an idea how much taller and sharper the image is by selecting the 16:9/Widescreen setting on the DVD player set up as some of you already have when xperimentin' :P Of course your TV set not being 16:9 wide will show the image squeezed onto it's 4:3 "box"

the DVD player Set up 4:3/Pan Scan setting is there to un-squeeze that full resolution image so it looks normal on a 4:3 tv , but of course, by expanding the width 33%, so you get 33% pan scaned image of the 16:9 image on your 4:3 display. That is, if the 16:9 coded DVD has a pan/scan flag or your player can override it if the DVD doesn't have it.

There's no difference on a 4:3 display betwen the 4:3 pan scan setting and the 4:3 letterbox setting if the DVD doesn't have the flag: Both settings will letterbox the 16:9 coded widescreen movie (unless your DVD player is one of those that likes you more than usual and overrides the absence of the flag for you ;) )

The only DVDs I have that seem to have the Pan scan flag seem to be PAL discs (of course i haven't gone and tested all of them im too busy watching them in their proper ratios :P)
For example, i have the PAL The Greatest Story Ever Told disc. This is a 16:9 coded disc of an UltraPanavision 2.75 wide movie. If I'm watching it on a 4:3 display with the 4:3 Letterbox setting the image is letterboxed less than half the height of the display. If I choose 16:9 Widescreen it becomes 33% taller but its distorted cus of the 16:9 coding (people are tall and thin cus they need the wider 16:9 display) Ahh but if I choose 4:3 PanScan which is meant to mantain the full height of a 16:9 coded movie on a 4:3 TV, the image widens (unsqueezes.) Now i get a pan scan of my movie (in this case since the movie was 2.75 i lose 33% so i end up with a 2.06 wide movie. I'm sure this disc has the Pan Scan flag because of its extreme wideness might been considered too extreme a letterboxing on a 4:3 display. :twisted:)

Which brings us to those other Widescreen movies :Scope
Scope movies being wider than 4:3 too, also benefit with the 16:9 coding extra resolution so that's why they are better in 16:9. But since Scope movies are even wider than the 16:9 frame (being from 2.00 wide to 2.75 wide), even on a 16:9 display they will have to be shrunk round 33% to fit the whole wide long image onto the 16:9 frame (for 4:3 tvs they are shrunk another 33%) so those will always be letterboxed on 4:3 displays AND 16:9 displays. (Unless you use a zoom feature to fill up the screen height by chopping off the sides.)

(Or they start using 21:9 coding and 21:9 displays. :P)



When you put 4:3 coded movie on a 16:9 display, the display should pillarbox the 4:3 DVDs square image to mantain correct proportion and get the full image and OAR. If your 4:3 disc has a letterboxed widescreen movie , or an open matte version of a widescreen movie, you can use the zoom function to enlarge the mage tll it fills the screen to your satisfaction but those movies wont looks as good as 16:9 enhanced movies cus they have less resolution/pixels. You can also zoom non widescreen 4:3 disc to your hearts content chopping the top and bottom or xperimenting with the strech-o function ;) If a 4:3 Full frame disc looks fine zoomed it was probably composed or protected for a wider presentation or its actually a widescreen movie in disguised open matte version ;) Or the cameraman was veeery bad and didnt know how to frame :twisted:

On HDTV from what I've seen 4:3 movies are coded in 16:9 with pillarboxed bars and the wider Scope movies are codded in 16:9 with letterboxed bars (unless the 4:3 are cropped head and feet, and the Scope are panscanned without their sides (the Super-35 Scopes open matted), all to 1.78 :roll: but that's another topic)

Also another topic would be if on HD Discs they could kept a 4:3 movie 4:3 coded and the Scope movies 21:9 coded (using the full 1080 x 1920 resolution for them too without pillarboxes or letterboxes) and the display or player resized the images for any size/shape display which would always give the best optimum quality for all film formats and display combinations. It could happen. Some day... Image


ok this one came shorter than the others.
Image
Maybe i should invite Jafar to the batcave and show him Aladdin in 16:9 to spoil him :twisted:
Last edited by deathie mouse on Sat Jan 29, 2005 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
orestes.

Post by orestes. »

Thank you for that informative post. I get everything but it's so much info that minor details seem to pass me by and never owning one of these televisions or reading too much into them I'm not 100% sure what to expect but I think you described it quite well.

I remember when buying a TV wasn't a chore. :) ......it's a fun chore however.
User avatar
Disney Guru
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3294
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 5:31 pm
Location: Utah

Widescreen TV

Post by Disney Guru »

I had bought a new Toshiba Widescreen HDTV in November, but It was defective, and I returned it and got a nother defective one. so I just got a Toshiba Full Screen tv, that I use as a widescreen by blowing up the size when I watch widescreen movies.
"I have this tremendous energy. I just loved and love life. I love it today. I never want to die."
~Jayne Meadows Allen~
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Re: Widescreen TV

Post by Luke »

Disney Guru wrote:so I just got a Toshiba Full Screen tv, that I use as a widescreen by blowing up the size when I watch widescreen movies.
:brick:
"Fifteen years from now, when people are talking about 3-D, they will talk about the business before 'Monsters vs. Aliens' and the business after 'Monsters vs. Aliens.' It's the line in the sand." - Greg Foster, IMAX chairman and president
Key
Special Edition
Posts: 891
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:53 am
Location: SoCal
Contact:

Re: 4:3, 16:9, widescreens,letterbox, pillarbox, shoebox, re

Post by Key »

deathie mouse wrote:Ahhhhhhhhhhh you're all so confusing aaahh

my eyes they distooooorttttttt


:)


This subject is very connvoluted and... Maybe i should invite Jafar to the batcave and show him Aladdin in 16:9 to spoil him :twisted:
Heeey, deathie, love, would you please direct yourself to this thread here and help us out? We need your knowledge of HD-DVDs/Blu-rays! :lol:
Wherever. Whatever. Have a nice day.
Jack
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2320
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 4:51 pm

Post by Jack »

I've been fortunate enough to purchase a widescreen TV - specifically a 36-inch Phillips HD-ready tube TV. Comparing it to better brands, like Toshiba or Sony, is pales somewhat, but its still a pretty good display. I purchased it at Costco for a very good price of $650.
Post Reply