Here's a review from a - lets say - obsessive Picture Quality nut. But it has some interesting screenshots. It compares the US Hunchback of Notre Dame with the German Release.
http://www.videophile.info/Review/Hunch ... ack_01.htm
As you can see, the R2 does look better.
All this time, I've been thinking it's the higher PAL resolution making the PAL disc look better. Perhaps European discs just get better transfers and encoding? (That's certainly true for Pocahontas).
Hunchback R1 vs R2 online comparison
Hunchback R1 vs R2 online comparison
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
Re: Hunchback R1 vs R2 online comparison
2099net wrote:Here's a review from a - lets say - obsessive Picture Quality nut.
Let's see what a portion of this movie's frames look blown up a billion times...
well, I´ve seen caps from the european transfer and, though it has better image quality but it has several dust and even I saw some "ants"

Last edited by PheR on Sun Oct 26, 2003 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'ts enough for this restless warrior just to be with you...
- BasilOfBakerStreet427
- In The Vaults
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 6:31 pm
- Location: 9764 Jeopardy Lane With Al,Peg,Kelly and Bud Bundy
Well, I won't deny the 4% speed-up exists, but I've never noticed it. Most PAL users can't (but I suspect this is because they've grown-up with the speed-up and treat is as normal - even if a NTSC version of the film is played immediately before, they just don't notice it).
As for PAL always being better - in theory it should be. But in practice it's not (lots of reasons from not spending for new transfers to poor encoding).
Disney Animated DVDs do seem to be much better in PAL though. The Beauty and the Beast suffers from the same artifacts as the R1 Hunchback, but the PAL version is much better. Even on discs like The Lion King which are near flawless on R1, the PAL looks better. Generally on my (laughingly called) home theatre system, there is no substantial difference on PAL and NTSC live action movies.
Odd, because in theory the extra resolution means that approximately 20% more disc space will be needed to store the video.
As for PAL always being better - in theory it should be. But in practice it's not (lots of reasons from not spending for new transfers to poor encoding).
Disney Animated DVDs do seem to be much better in PAL though. The Beauty and the Beast suffers from the same artifacts as the R1 Hunchback, but the PAL version is much better. Even on discs like The Lion King which are near flawless on R1, the PAL looks better. Generally on my (laughingly called) home theatre system, there is no substantial difference on PAL and NTSC live action movies.
Odd, because in theory the extra resolution means that approximately 20% more disc space will be needed to store the video.
Most of my Blu-ray collection some of my UK discs aren't on their database
- Loomis
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
- Contact:
I think it is because people who grew up on PAL are just naturally faster.2099net wrote: Well, I won't deny the 4% speed-up exists, but I've never noticed it. Most PAL users can't (but I suspect this is because they've grown-up with the speed-up and treat is as normal - even if a NTSC version of the film is played immediately before, they just don't notice it).
They have to play the things at a 4% speed-up to catch up with our natural speed.
It works in theory anyways...
Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter