Sky-Sky wrote:So do I! I plan to re-read it when I'm done with Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (my fave of that series) again just because it's started to be a kind of tradition since the Summer of '04 when waiting for the film, and every Christmas since. I still like Christmas with the Kranks, my family seems to have it in high regard, for some reason, placing it in with Home Alone and Christmas Vacation, but I'll be damned if the book is not leagues better. In any case, long live Luther Krank!Escapay wrote: Whenever I feel like I'm losing the Christmas Spirit, I just pick up my worn-out copy of Skipping Christmas by John Grisham and read it until I feel Christmassy again.
albert
The book is definitely leagues better than the movie. The problem with the movie is that it tried to intentionally be a comedy with dramatic moments, rather than a drama with comedic moments. Had they done the latter (and perhaps got better leads), it could have easily become a timeless Christmas film. I hold the film in high regard mainly because I love train wrecks, and this is one of the biggest.
For the most part, the story elements are true to the book (we do lose a few throwaway scenes and characters, but other than that...). However, the entire theme and atmosphere of the book is lost for the reason I said above (it tries to be a comedy). The few and far between elements that were original (Luther's botox, Nora's search for ham, Marty being Santa, the burglar that Spike lets in the house, etc.) were stupid and rather unnecessary. I would have preferred seeing Luther's only supporter (Yank Slader) and the rejection of fruitcakes by the firemen.pap64 wrote:I never read the book so I can't say if the movie is true to the book
Also, Luther in the movie comes off as more heartless and selfless than he does in the book (where skipping Christmas is both an economical and personal decision).
albert

















