The Little Mermaid III Discussion

wrestling_stat · Post by **wrestling_stat** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:29 am

Ariel'sprince wrote:
Vermin Friends wrote:Ariel gave up her life for love, and Melody gave up... well, nothing for a dream. I'm hoping they handle the plot well.
Good point,Ariel had a dream and made if come true but Meldoy... didn't do anything,she didn't even made her dream come true (she wasn't a mermaid like she wanted,she's just made the merpeople and humans be togather again,what they'll do anyway after Morgana died).
Anyway i think that The Little Mermaid II is a stupid movie.

Now please let me know if I am incorrect because I haven't seen the 2nd movie for a while but was Meldoy's dream to be one with the sea. She never understood why the wall was up and why she couldn't go swim in the sea when it was so much part of her. And now she can go into the sea when ever she wants. She doesn't have that restriction that she had before.

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:40 am

wrestling_stat wrote:
Ariel'sprince wrote: Good point,Ariel had a dream and made if come true but Meldoy... didn't do anything,she didn't even made her dream come true (she wasn't a mermaid like she wanted,she's just made the merpeople and humans be togather again,what they'll do anyway after Morgana died).
Anyway i think that The Little Mermaid II is a stupid movie.
Now please let me know if I am incorrect because I haven't seen the 2nd movie for a while but was Meldoy's dream to be one with the sea. She never understood why the wall was up and why she couldn't go swim in the sea when it was so much part of her. And now she can go into the sea when ever she wants. She doesn't have that restriction that she had before.

She wanted to be a mermaid and she wasn't a mermaid in the end.

Vermin Friends · Post by **Vermin Friends** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:08 am

Ariel'sprince wrote:
wrestling_stat wrote: Now please let me know if I am incorrect because I haven't seen the 2nd movie for a while but was Meldoy's dream to be one with the sea. She never understood why the wall was up and why she couldn't go swim in the sea when it was so much part of her. And now she can go into the sea when ever she wants. She doesn't have that restriction that she had before.
She wanted to be a mermaid and she wasn't a mermaid in the end.

I believe you (wrestling_stat) are correct. While she did want to be a mermaid, as Ariel'sprince mentioned, I think she loved the sea, and wanted to be able to share that passion with her mother, more than she wanted to be a mermaid.

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:49 am

Amazon just posted this as the artwork:

It's really bad (and why do they use that Ariel clipart if that sence was re-done?) but i think it's not the final cover art (it's just seems like a poster).
Anyway i hope we'll get a different and better cover (Cinderella III had a different cover art kinda similar to first and then it was changed),Enchanted allready had a bad cover art.

UmbrellaFish · Post by **UmbrellaFish** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:52 am

Yeah, it's not very good. It's just a poster, though, I think.

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:56 am

I think the same thing (also why they should use that Ariel clipart if that sence re-done?).

UmbrellaFish · Post by **UmbrellaFish** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:02 am

We don't have any real proof the scence has been changed, but I sure hope so. I agree, though, that if the scene's been changed it makes no sense to use the clipart of Ariel from that scene on the cover. I have faith Disney will change it by the time we get real cover art.

UmbrellaFish · Post by **UmbrellaFish** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:04 am

Sorry, double post.

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:31 am

UmbrellaFish wrote:We don't have any real proof the scence has been changed, but I sure hope so. I agree, though, that if the scene's been changed it makes no sense to use the clipart of Ariel from that scene on the cover. I have faith Disney will change it by the time we get real cover art.

Even if the sence didn't changed this clipart is just ugly.
Me too

i think we'll see a better cover and Ariel clipart (a clipart from the marchandise i hope,like the Cinderella clipart from the Cinderella III cover).

Vermin Friends · Post by **Vermin Friends** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:54 pm

I'm pretty sure it's just a poster, as UmbrellaFish said. The logo is too small, and since The Little Mermaid II's posters and cover arts are similar to posters and cover arts of the original film, I'm sure they'd at least attempt to follow the tradition, especially if this is going to be the last direct-to-video sequel from Disney.

supertalies · Post by **supertalies** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:15 am

yes, I agree, it's just a poster !
Here is another one, from the arisocats dvd.
Everybody probably has seen it already ,but here it is again.
The only new thing is the inclusion of 3 (forgot the names) other sisters.

suddenly I realise, what if....This is the new cover!!!

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:50 am

Nah,it's not.
And actually only Andrina was on the cover,Arista,Attina and Adela wern't,the other sister on the poster and website was Aquata.
The final will have a different Ariel clipart.

Vermin Friends · Post by **Vermin Friends** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:12 pm

I'm almost sure that this isn't the cover. Just another poster. Still, it looks great!

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:18 pm

And you're right,it's not the cover,it's just another ad (for exmaple-Cinderella II ad and Ratatouille ad looked like this ad and their cover arts were very different).

supertalies · Post by **supertalies** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:58 pm

Ariel'sprince wrote:And you're right,it's not the cover,it's just another ad (for exmaple-Cinderella II ad and Ratatouille ad looked like this ad and their cover arts were very different).

I know, I was just joking!
And if this becomes the Cover..I am going to kill the people at disney that desing covers..(after the princess and the frog offcourse!)

gumby17 · Post by **gumby17** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:15 pm

apparently there will be a trailer on the Hannah Montana: One in a Million DVD!

UmbrellaFish · Post by **UmbrellaFish** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:32 pm

gumby17 wrote:apparently there will be a trailer on the Hannah Montana: One in a Million DVD!

That's just another example of Disney's cruel way of making Disney fans buy Hannah Montana DVDs.

Sky Syndrome · Post by **Sky Syndrome** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:00 pm

UmbrellaFish wrote:
gumby17 wrote:apparently there will be a trailer on the Hannah Montana: One in a Million DVD!
That's just another example of Disney's cruel way of making Disney fans buy Hannah Montana DVDs.

Yep, there's a LM III trailer mentioned in UltimateDisney's review of the DVD. I hope it shows more new footage than old!

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:25 pm

gumby17 wrote:apparently there will be a trailer on the Hannah Montana: One in a Million DVD!

What? that's cruel thought i guess that's the only way that lots of people will buy those DVDs?.

singerguy04 · Post by **singerguy04** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:36 pm

Ariel'sprince wrote:
gumby17 wrote:apparently there will be a trailer on the Hannah Montana: One in a Million DVD!
What? that's cruel thought i guess that's the only way that lots of people will buy those DVDs?.

Well, not to be mean to anyone but... if you waste your money on a DVD you don't want to get in order to see a trailer that you can wait a week and see on youtube for free... then you're pretty dumb.

On a side note, a lot of people are buying Hannah Montana DVD's because she actually is one of Disney's hottest products, so it's only logical to put this trailor on this DVD.

I don't mean to be a debby downer or anything, i think it's probably just because I have about 5 more hours of homework left and it's already midnight where I am...

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

The Little Mermaid III Discussion