Beverly Hills Chihuahua - 'Art Of' Book now Available!!

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
magicalwands
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2099
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:24 am
Location: Gusteau's Restaurant

Post by magicalwands »

Prince Edward wrote:This looks stupid. Why does Disney use time and money on making such movies when they could have concentrated their efforts on quality movies that may become classic? Stupid, greedy Disney.
It takes too much effort to make classics so they go for what audiences want. But with this movie, it goes against that belief.
Image
User avatar
Mr arrow
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 163
Joined: Fri May 09, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: venus

Post by Mr arrow »

After seeing the new trailer I am a hundred times more optomistic about this movie... Disney animal comedies (and dramas) are nearly as much a part of studio legacy as animated classics. Though I personally cant really take to talking computer generated BABE style animal movies. This one actually looks like it could be a lot of fun. Disney failed as far as Im concerned with the remake of That Darn Cat....Im hoping that this one will be marginally better. Im sure it has to be a lot more entertaining than watching near adult individuals on you tube with nothing more creative to do with their time than thumb their noses at what is essentially a childrens film.
katemonster
Special Edition
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Post by katemonster »

That's a good point- Disney does have a really impressive track record with animal comedies. I thought the theatrical trailer was funny and the more news I hear about the film, the more I like it. I realize there is a lot of criticism out there but I am going to check out the film and decide for myself , plus the cast is really impressive and I don't think Jamie Lee Curtis, Drew Barrymore, Andy Garcia and George Lopez would all sign on to something that wasn't funny.
User avatar
Paka
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 11:38 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Paka »

Apparently Disney has even engaged a viral marketing campaign for this film...

http://heel.la/

http://dreamdogsart.typepad.com/art/200 ... y-get.html

Interesting I must admit, especially the poster art design. What a ridiculous waste of resources. :roll:
Life often leaves us standing bare, naked and dejected with a lost opportunity. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residues of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: "Too late."

~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
User avatar
musicradio77
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Contact:

Post by musicradio77 »

I've seen the trailer back in May right before "The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian" started. Juniorfan89 on YouTube made his own reaction to the upcoming film. Why not check this video out. There is also an old trailer to "Angels in the Outfield" which was at the end of the video.

WARNING: This video contains some foul language.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdTC1fI0ZtM

"Beverly Hill Chihuahua" is the film that I wouldn't look forward to see it.
User avatar
kbehm29
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1184
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:49 am
Location: Too Far Away from Disney
Contact:

Post by kbehm29 »

katemonster wrote:That's a good point- Disney does have a really impressive track record with animal comedies. I thought the theatrical trailer was funny and the more news I hear about the film, the more I like it. I realize there is a lot of criticism out there but I am going to check out the film and decide for myself , plus the cast is really impressive and I don't think Jamie Lee Curtis, Drew Barrymore, Andy Garcia and George Lopez would all sign on to something that wasn't funny.
Exactly. The new trailer makes the movie make much more sense and is appealing as a family comedy. This is not going to be that big of a disaster. I actually laughed a few times during the trailer. Big name stars would not sign on if they knew a bomb was coming on. I will be there to see it opening day weekend with my kids.
Disneyland Trips: 1983, 1992, 1995, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2016, Aug 2018
Walt Disney World Trips: 1999, 2007, 2011, 2014, 2016, ~Dec 2018~, ~Apr 2019~
Favorite Disney Movies: Peter Pan, 101 Dalmatians, Tangled, The Princess and the Frog, Enchanted, FROZEN
katemonster
Special Edition
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Post by katemonster »

Yeah I am going to see it opening weekend. A friend of mine who actually has a cute little dog that he spoils LOL wants to see it too. We were watching Ocean's 11 and I just love Andy Garcia in that movie- I can't wait to hear him doing a voice over in Beverly Hills Chihuahua. I love that Disney gets actors - I know there will be some humor that I can appreciate with that cast.
dvdjunkie
Signature Collection
Posts: 5613
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:05 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Post by dvdjunkie »

In my own opinion, this movie is going to rank right down there with "Epic Movie", "Date Movie", and "Disaster Movie" as one of those you wait for to come to DVD and then use your Rent-One-Get-One-Free and make sure that it's the free one. I hate to say this, but I have seen all three different trailers and nothing has shown me that this is going to anything more than a movie for kids 8-12. My nine-year-old granddaughter was with me when we saw the second trailer, and she looked at me and said, "Another stupid movie to make people spend money!". I think she hit the nail on the head.

:D
The only way to watch movies - Original Aspect Ratio!!!!
I LOVE my Blu-Ray Disc Player!
User avatar
pap64
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Post by pap64 »

dvdjunkie wrote:In my own opinion, this movie is going to rank right down there with "Epic Movie", "Date Movie", and "Disaster Movie" as one of those you wait for to come to DVD and then use your Rent-One-Get-One-Free and make sure that it's the free one. I hate to say this, but I have seen all three different trailers and nothing has shown me that this is going to anything more than a movie for kids 8-12. My nine-year-old granddaughter was with me when we saw the second trailer, and she looked at me and said, "Another stupid movie to make people spend money!". I think she hit the nail on the head.

:D
Call it a hunch, but I expect "Chihuahua" to be funnier than any of the "_____Movies" combined.

(Not expecting anything great out of BHC, but the parody movies are so bad I doubt they end up being better than BHC)

Off topic, but your icon is too big, DVDjunkie. Plus the hosting side took it down.
ImageImageImageImage

Image
User avatar
Siren
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3749
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Siren »

I saw this graphic on an anti-puppy mill website....priceless!

Image
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

:lol:.
Image
katemonster
Special Edition
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Post by katemonster »

That's kind of ridiculous. Disney does a lot for animal rights - have you seen their Bolt Across America tour to benefit the ASPCA?

Ultimately I think the individual should take responsibility for their actions - like look at Lassie or Homeward Bound. I mean really, is no studio allowed to make an animal film?
I think getting a pet you can't handle is unfortunate but again the blame falls on the person who gets the chihuahua without being prepared.
User avatar
Siren
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3749
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Siren »

katemonster wrote:That's kind of ridiculous. Disney does a lot for animal rights - have you seen their Bolt Across America tour to benefit the ASPCA?

Ultimately I think the individual should take responsibility for their actions - like look at Lassie or Homeward Bound. I mean really, is no studio allowed to make an animal film?
I think getting a pet you can't handle is unfortunate but again the blame falls on the person who gets the chihuahua without being prepared.
Unfortunatly too many people are really stupid in this world. And they impulse buy.

Also Disney does NOTHING for animal rights. Disney has done SOME stuff for animal welfare. There IS a BIG difference. And they have only what they have because of pressure from animal welfare groups who have had letter writing campaigns about their movies like 101 Dalmations and all its remakes and sequels. Statistically speaking, dalmation sales went up dramatically after every 101 Dalmations movie. 6 months to 1 year later, dalmation abandonment in rescues and shelters went up dramatically.

Think of it this way....when someone preforms a stunt, they say "don't try this at home, we are professionals". Animal welfare groups have been pressure Disney for years to add a similar disclaimer stating to do research before acquiring the breed. Disney started such a thing with the 102 Dalmations DVD where the parrot tells kids about different breeds. Then Eight Below contained a small pamphlet about Siberian Huskies from the AKC.

Is it Disney's responsibility to educate the audience about breeds? No. Would it be nice if they at least tried to since the evidence shows that movies about specific breeds directly effect the market for that breed and then the ultimate abandonment of it? Yes.


Also, that add wasn't attacking Disney. I felt it was trying to get people to ADOPT rather than buy a chihuahua.
User avatar
pap64
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Post by pap64 »

Ariel'sprince wrote::lol:.
Um, I know humor is subjective, but the topic of animal cruelty and shelters is a serious one, and the image speaks of awareness of these issues. Its not meant to be taken lightly.

And frankly, I understand your point Siren, but I think its EVERYONE'S responsibility not just Disney's. Animal shelters and adoption agencies should inform the potential owners about the pet they are about to adopt. If its confirmed that they want a pet because they liked a particular movie its part of their job to tell them that their decision might not be a good one.

Also, part of the responsibilities lies in the hands of the parents. This sort of thing impacts children more than adults. Adults know and understand the responsibilities that come with a pet, but children don't. All they see is that a movie they liked has an animal they think its cute.

So if we are going to point fingers and say who should be responsible then everyone is guilty and everyone takes part of the blame.

EDIT: Ariel'sPrince, sorry if I sounded harsh. Its just that I take animal cruelty issues VERY seriously and believe its nothing to be made light of.
ImageImageImageImage

Image
User avatar
Siren
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3749
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Siren »

I agree, parents know a pet means responsibility, but that doesn't mean an automatic know-how in specific breed behaviors.
Sure, those dalmations are really smart and wow...so well behaved in the movie.
Little do they know, 3-6+ dalmatians play just ONE character, because they are each taught a different series of tricks. Not one dog in that movie played its entire part from start to finish. Dalmatians aren't stupid per say, but they are stubborn. They are also often born deaf, which makes training more difficult. And they are also super high energy and get bored easily when left home alone, and boredom leads to destructive behavior. I remember seeing a documentary about domestic dogs and a woman was on there with a dalmatian. They put a hidden camera in her house and saw just what the dog did when she left...bad separation anxiety (something many dalmatians have, so its not a learned behavior, its genetically programmed) and it actually ripped up her couch to the point of exposing the springs.
That's a dalmatian. That is not ALL dalmatians, but that is MANY of them.

Now chihuahuas...my grandmother had one for 14 years. I got to know the breed well.
They are very nippy. Very prone to bite. And those that aren't biters, tend to be scared of everything. And the best part with chihuahuas (and many toy breeds) they are exceedingly difficult to housebreak. No movie shows you those things. No breeder does either. Rescues and shelters are more likely to educate prospective owners. But the best thing to do is for people to research the breeds themselves.

Unfortunatly, parents don't always do this. They knows dogs require shots, and walking, and playtime, but not all breeds are suitable for all people. And even the usual top pics for family pets are the worst picks. Like labradors. High energy dogs, who can be destructive like the dalmations. Cockers are another popular family pet choice, many of them are very aggressive. I wish more movies would focus on the plights of shelter dogs and less on these purebreds that are shown to be perfect angels and very intelligent and the perfect family pet.
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

pap64 wrote:
Ariel'sprince wrote::lol:.
Um, I know humor is subjective, but the topic of animal cruelty and shelters is a serious one, and the image speaks of awareness of these issues. Its not meant to be taken lightly.

And frankly, I understand your point Siren, but I think its EVERYONE'S responsibility not just Disney's. Animal shelters and adoption agencies should inform the potential owners about the pet they are about to adopt. If its confirmed that they want a pet because they liked a particular movie its part of their job to tell them that their decision might not be a good one.

Also, part of the responsibilities lies in the hands of the parents. This sort of thing impacts children more than adults. Adults know and understand the responsibilities that come with a pet, but children don't. All they see is that a movie they liked has an animal they think its cute.

So if we are going to point fingers and say who should be responsible then everyone is guilty and everyone takes part of the blame.

EDIT: Ariel'sPrince, sorry if I sounded harsh. Its just that I take animal cruelty issues VERY seriously and believe its nothing to be made light of.
No no,I wasn't laughing on animale cruelty,I was laughing about the characters from the film gets to a shelter,I also don't think that animale cruelty is funny and I think it's sad,sorry if it looks that way.
Image
User avatar
Siren
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3749
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Siren »

Did you laugh when Lady went to the pound? :?
User avatar
Ariel'sprince
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3244
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:07 am
Location: beyond the meadows of joy and the valley of contentment
Contact:

Post by Ariel'sprince »

No,but I laughted because I knew people hate the film so they send the character there,all alone :P.
Anyway I realized it's not funny.
Image
User avatar
Paka
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 11:38 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Paka »

Hehe - hey Siren, did you see this (somewhat half-assed) disclaimer text that Disney put on the bottom of the page at the film's website? Don't ask me why I was there - I don't know either. ;)

Owning a pet is a major responsibility. Dogs require daily care and constant attention. Before bringing a dog into your family, research the specific breed to make sure it is suitable for your particular situation. Learn about and be willing to undertake the serious responsibilities of dog care. Always consider adoption from a reputable shelter or rescue program.

These sorts of gentle reminders won't do a whole hell of a lot to prevent breed fads. Call me cynical, but all I see is Disney covering their butts legally on the issue. :roll:
Life often leaves us standing bare, naked and dejected with a lost opportunity. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residues of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: "Too late."

~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
User avatar
Siren
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3749
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Siren »

Paka wrote:Hehe - hey Siren, did you see this (somewhat half-assed) disclaimer text that Disney put on the bottom of the page at the film's website? Don't ask me why I was there - I don't know either. ;)

Owning a pet is a major responsibility. Dogs require daily care and constant attention. Before bringing a dog into your family, research the specific breed to make sure it is suitable for your particular situation. Learn about and be willing to undertake the serious responsibilities of dog care. Always consider adoption from a reputable shelter or rescue program.

These sorts of gentle reminders won't do a whole hell of a lot to prevent breed fads. Call me cynical, but all I see is Disney covering their butts legally on the issue. :roll:
Oooo...that will REALLY help :roll:

Remember the days of Benji? When a professional trainer adopted a mutt, trained it, made movies with it, and then did countless interviews on how the little mutt came from the shelter and look what a fantastic animal actor he was.
It still happens today. A few articles talking about Fang from Harry Potter...the principal dogs used in the movie was actually a rescued junkyard dog. A dog you would assume would be one mean SOB, turned out instead, he was a lovable mush who was easy to train.

Too bad Disney wouldn't do the same and pay animal trainers to adopt the dogs from shelters and rescues, train them, and then when all the interviews start, sit the dogs down and say what rescues they came from.
Post Reply