More than concept art, that's more like a 3-D still that rotated around and showed all dimensions and sides! That's no mere sketch, that's what a finished film still would look like. 3-D CGI that looks like a painting.
I agree, if they just made the film exactly like that, it'd be perfect in look.
Tangled! (The Artist Formerly Known As Rapunzel)
-
Disney Duster
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 14024
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: America
-
ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
Re: Rapunzel
Not even close. It'd be way too much on such a production.Disney Duster wrote:More than concept art, that's more like a 3-D still that rotated around and showed all dimensions and sides! That's no mere sketch, that's what a finished film still would look like. 3-D CGI that looks like a painting.
I agree, if they just made the film exactly like that, it'd be perfect in look.
-
Disney Duster
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 14024
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: America
Rapunzel
BUT that is what Glen Keane always intended! For the film's animation to look exactly like that finished still!
Re: Rapunzel
what i don't understand is with all the technology we have, you'd think we' just be able to tell computers to make it look that way.. you know?ajmrowland wrote:Not even close. It'd be way too much on such a production.Disney Duster wrote:More than concept art, that's more like a 3-D still that rotated around and showed all dimensions and sides! That's no mere sketch, that's what a finished film still would look like. 3-D CGI that looks like a painting.
I agree, if they just made the film exactly like that, it'd be perfect in look.
-
Super Aurora
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4835
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am
Re: Rapunzel
Our technology is not THAT advance yet.nomad2010 wrote:what i don't understand is with all the technology we have, you'd think we' just be able to tell computers to make it look that way.. you know?ajmrowland wrote: Not even close. It'd be way too much on such a production.
-
blackcauldron85
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 16691
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:54 am
- Gender: Female
- Contact:
-
Rumpelstiltskin
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 9:05 pm
- Gender: Male
What I don't understand is why they have decided to use the Disney animation from the 50's as an inspiration. This style has already inspired the look of The Princess and the Frog. Somewhere in the future, we could hopefully have a movie based on the style from the peak of the 40's.
As it has already been quoted in this thread:
“The design of (this) film will try to put … a fresh twist on a 1950s retro vibe. “Byron and I are such huge fans of Disneyland, and of Fantasyland in particular,” Nathan says. “The architecture of Fantasyland is nostalgic 1950s Fantasyland. There’s real appeal and style that are used in films like Cinderella, so we’re doing research on that style …”
As it has already been quoted in this thread:
“The design of (this) film will try to put … a fresh twist on a 1950s retro vibe. “Byron and I are such huge fans of Disneyland, and of Fantasyland in particular,” Nathan says. “The architecture of Fantasyland is nostalgic 1950s Fantasyland. There’s real appeal and style that are used in films like Cinderella, so we’re doing research on that style …”
I've said some negative things about this movie before, but if the finished product manages to look anything like that third pic (which is only concept art, I presume), I'm gonna have to eat my words.
Is Kristin Chenoweth still the voice of Rapunzel? Because it seems they based the character's looks off of her.
Is Kristin Chenoweth still the voice of Rapunzel? Because it seems they based the character's looks off of her.
-
KubrickFan
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:22 am
I don't think there's any news on that, only rumors. Apparently, according to IMDb David Schwimmer and Peter Sallis (Wallace from the claymation films) are also in this. I don't know whether there's any truth to that, but it would be good.Mooky wrote: Is Kristin Chenoweth still the voice of Rapunzel? Because it seems they based the character's looks off of her.
-
goofystitch
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 1:30 pm
- Location: Walt Disney World
-
Jules
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4623
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Malta, Europe
- Contact:
Is this an authentic David Schwimmer Facebook page? Or is it fanmade? It's difficult to tell with these celebrities ...
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id= ... ref=search
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id= ... ref=search
-
singerguy04
- Collector's Edition
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:40 pm
- Location: The Land of Lincoln
That's definitely fake. Besides, I doubt he'd use a publicity photo for his profile pic... Nobody's that vain.Julian Carter wrote:Is this an authentic David Schwimmer Facebook page? Or is it fanmade? It's difficult to tell with these celebrities ...
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id= ... ref=search
-
Disney Duster
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 14024
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: America
Rapunzel
Yes, and it's all superbly beautiful, pretty perfect. I love it.
And look, instead of that plain tower in the clouds in the concept we got with the prince scaling the tower, they used the original, better, more beautiful tower with the roomier, house-on-top-of-the-tower-like structure. The OLD one on the left is the original, the NEW one on the right is based close to it:
I admit, I prefer the original's even roomier housier version, but it's nice that it's there at all...
But notice how in the original OLD one on the left, the painting is more detailed, rich, buttery, and rococco, the Fragonard look Glen Keane was going for? I hope they keep that, and don't make it just "painterly" like the new one makes me fear.
And look, instead of that plain tower in the clouds in the concept we got with the prince scaling the tower, they used the original, better, more beautiful tower with the roomier, house-on-top-of-the-tower-like structure. The OLD one on the left is the original, the NEW one on the right is based close to it:
I admit, I prefer the original's even roomier housier version, but it's nice that it's there at all...
But notice how in the original OLD one on the left, the painting is more detailed, rich, buttery, and rococco, the Fragonard look Glen Keane was going for? I hope they keep that, and don't make it just "painterly" like the new one makes me fear.
Re: Rapunzel
all of them:
if the whole movie looks like this.. or at least close (because obviously these are concept art) this will be disney's most beautiful movie (at least of the modern ones) without a doubt.
if the whole movie looks like this.. or at least close (because obviously these are concept art) this will be disney's most beautiful movie (at least of the modern ones) without a doubt.
-
Rumpelstiltskin
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 9:05 pm
- Gender: Male