Disney Duster wrote:Whoops. And with no sarcasm, I say thanks for telling me!

I missed it first time!
Don't worry, it was my fault. I should've replied in a separate post to make sure you saw it.
Disney Duster wrote:D82, thank you for showing me that picture! I bet they really did do that intentionally!
You're welcome.

I'm glad you also think that.
JeanGreyForever wrote:Yes, the pirates are pretty negative in Swiss Family Robinson but they're basically 80% racial stereotypes from what I remember. At least the pirates in Peter Pan were not racially stereotyped from what I remember. Even so, Swiss Family Robinson and Peter Pan are the two most dated films that Walt made imo. Both are full to the brim with sexism and racism.
Yeah, when people of other races were featured in movies back then they were usually very stereotyped.
JeanGreyForever wrote:In Mulan's case I'd say that making an entire race the villain with absolutely no nuance and even dehumanizing them is pretty bad. Especially since we've seen how China deals with races they consider beneath them like the Uighurs who are being locked in concentration camps and killed off like the Jews during the Holocaust but just like back then, nobody is doing anything to save them.
I actually never thought about that before, but I think you're right. Thankfully, in the remake it seems they're going to make them more human and give their leader a personal reason for going to war with the Chinese.
JeanGreyForever wrote:Keep in mind that they don't know much about babies and Tramp has to educate them a lot because he's a lot more wordly and knowledgable about human matters than they are so I always took it as Jock and Trusty have such privileged backgrounds with every whim catered to by their owners that for them, they can't imagine not being able to marry Lady and take her home. They'd have no idea that their human owners wouldn't be receptive to that.
That makes sense. I guess you're right about that.
JeanGreyForever wrote:It makes sense why Alice in Wonderland did that but I don't see why Peter Pan and The Wizard of Oz had to use those same endings since Oz and Neverland were always real in the books.
Well, in
Alice in Wonderland it's clearer it's a dream, whereas in
Peter Pan and
The Wizard of Oz they leave it more ambiguous. But if in the books the worlds were real, they should've respected that. Personally, I don't like when they leave it open to interpretation. I prefer them to make it clear whether it's all real or not.
blackcauldron85 wrote:Wait, I thought because Mr. & Mrs. Darling & Nana see the pirate ship at the end, that it wasn't a dream?!?!?
Yes, but the ship at the end seems made of clouds, so we can't be sure if it's Peter Pan's ship or just a cloud that happens to have that shape. I've always hated that, I wish it had been made clear it was the real ship.
blackcauldron85 wrote:I wonder, too, about how "What Makes the Red Man Red" has been unaddressed by Disney! I wonder if they would put a disclaimer on it (like HBO Max did with GWtW), or if they'd actually edit it.
I don't think it should be edited, but a disclaimer would be nice.