Ha. Don't go there, Dusty. It's an important part of a very big overall picture. I just find the colors they changed that you showed me to be quite minor. You only showed me one dress after all. And the color was still brown, it's just the tone that's off. Yes, by a lot. But... to me, it's her working dress. And brown is still brown.Disney Duster wrote:Hm. I am finding it very hard to understand that you don't mind that some colors really are wrong. That they actually changed some colors mistakenly. But it isn't your most favorite film of all time, and I guess it's small to you, so...
You're smart. We both are. You know the key thing here is... me noticing. I care that you care. But if you're asking me a question, and you did, you're going to get my honest answer. I'm sorry you can't understand it. But it's incredibly simple. Don't get the wrong impression, I would care if Disney screwed up a lot of different colors. But I haven't heard about more than just the hair color and the dress you showed me. So... you can't really expect me to be more shocked than I am.
Well, again like the Cinderella colors thing- you're catching me on an impulsive reaction. If you want to know the truth, I hate things that feel repetitious. I find the formula of the 90's Disney animated classic film was pretty good while it lasted, but to me the Hunchback character is boring and the guy doing his singing is incredibly irritating. The music yeah feels like microwaved (and I hope you know what I mean by that - limp, mushy) leftovers from Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, Pocahontas. Whatever. You're right, I wasn't too keen on the lyrics. But I wasn't too keen on anything in that movie. Maybe a rewatch would change that. But until then... I can't just lie to you and say I dug it.Disney Duster wrote:And I can't believe you don't think the Hunchback score is good! Maybe the lyrics aren't the best, I don't know, but the music itself by Alan Menken is some of the most amazing powerful music in any film...
That's probably all for the best because, I don't care what anyone has to say about my comments on The Princess and the Frog.Disney Duster wrote:I didn't follow everything you were saying about The Princess and the Frog.
Oh yeah, I know that too. I was being sarcastic.Disney Duster wrote:Well, anyway...Disney probably won't make a gay character any time soon
Oh... I think families do. If the monster success of Nickelodeon's iCarly is any indication. And that version of Zack and Cody that takes place on a cruise ship. Not to mention that in the original version, Mr. Moseby is far from overly masculine. I know the actor is straight, but you get my meaning. There are several dozens of incarnations of the non-manly guy on television. It's broadcasters and sponsors who have no backbone. It's broadcasters and sponsors who in fact, have the agenda. Just look at Rupert Murdoch.Disney Duster wrote:Disney probably won't make a gay character any time soon until, as you suggested, it becomes a trend, it is seen as acceptable for openly gay characters in family fare. Of course it is perfectly acceptable, families just need to freakin' realize it is.
Oh you're sure right about that. But I decided to get the Special Edition first. I had to flip through over 25 listings of that Platinum Edition before I found a Special Edition I thought would be a sure thing. I'll upgrade in a year or so. But for now, I want the DVD I'm familiar with and I rented the bonus disc from Netflix last November, so I've decided there are too many bonuses missing from that set onto the Platinum that I like. I made sure to read UD's review of the Platinum Edition and I'm salivating over that new documentary yeah but I can wait.Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, that Sleeping Beauty Special Edition is a great buy, but the newest DVD shouldn't be that expensive either