I wouldn't classify that scene as cynical. The humor is just zany, anachronistic, and out there like it is in The Emperor's New Groove. I don't see Hades as cynical either; he's just being a villain and Pegasus is jealous of the attention Herc gives Meg. Meg and Phil are cynical, but it works for the characters considering what they've been through. I don't see the movie as this cynical, anti-fairytale/fantasy film like Shrek, Chicken Little or even Tangled.farerb wrote:I saw this film again the other day and it made me realize that this film is extremely cynical and I never really noticed this before, what comes to my mind is the scene where Meg goes to the woods and then woodland creatures appear as if they came from Snow White or Sleeping Beauty, then they start talking as if they are from Loony Toons and then it turns out to be Pain and Panic. It stood out to me cause that's something that Walt would have never done in his films, but there were other moments, but overall most of the characters are cynical: Hades, Meg, Phil, Pegasus.
It would be a stretch to say they were forced to direct Hercules. They chose Hercules themselves among a list of many other projects. No one imposed it on them. Yes, they wanted to do Treasure Planet, but they wanted to do that ever since The Great Mouse Detective. So, unless you believe they were forced to direct Aladdin too saying that about Hercules is inconsistent as they went through the exact same selection process for both.Mooky wrote:Perhaps because Musker and Clements were basically forced into making it, their heart wasn't really in it and that shows up in the final project? It's just a strange product in itself, interesting but still strange, where all the ingredients that make it are so mismatched (source material, visual design, celebrity/pop culture humor, gospel music) yet they still somehow work.
In regards to the music, it was their idea to do Gospel, even though Menken initially wanted something more traditional and classic like "Candide". The visual style was their doing as well. They wanted to go more stylized on Aladdin too but Katzenberg wouldn't let them. He wanted designs closer to the Disney house style. His successor Peter Schneider let them push the envelope in that area on Hercules like they wanted.
To me, it was very clear from the trailers that Hercules was based on the "dim-witted but kind-hearted jock" archetype. Nothing like Gaston.The early trailers portrayed Herc as something of a bumbling, self-absorbed egotistical type hero having comic misadventures, and I was really looking forward to that type of portrayal, a "Gaston who learns a lesson" if you will.
This wouldn't have worked. Hercules isn't street-smart like Aladdin who could have outwitted or tricked the Titans or Hades into defeat.The plot point of him losing his powers could have been a great way to explore this, forcing Hercules to save the day on his own merits instead of his god-given gifts.
Disney's Divinity wrote:The ultimate focus of the plot is on how being a hero is what the motivation is (and possibly the sacrifices you're willing to make), not really whether you solve the problem with brain or brawn.
Yes, and I believe the film succeeds in getting that message across.
That's true. Ariel, Belle, Jasmine, Nala, Pocahontas, Esmeralda all improve the men in their lives. It was a nice change of pace to see the reverse happen in Hercules.Disney's Divinity wrote:That was actually a common Renaissance trope, of men being "enlightened" by a female character. It's actually interesting to see it in reverse with Megara being changed and overcoming her faults because of Hercules.