Tangled (formerly Rapunzel) Discussion - Part II
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
You are correct, sir. It is fan made. It is based on the picture from Disney FAN magazine that I drew for fun, because I think Rapunzel is cute just like my sister-in-law, Stephanie, and Flynn Rider is handsome like my brother, Nick.robster16 wrote:I think that isn't official concept art but fanmade... just my opinion...
The New Disney's Rapunzel from Disney FAN

Ladies and gentlemen. BEHOLD, the new Disney's Rapunzel from Disney FAN. I arranged it for fun.
They would think that but I dont see how it would flop as a result of that. This film has three things going for it that TPatF didnt from a profit standpoint: celebrity voices, less girl centric, and probably more adult appealing jokes and humorPolizzi wrote: Good News: I can still see the movie.
Bad News: I hate to say this, I would probably find it a flop...maybe (hopefully not). People would probably say that it is a parody to "Shrek," "Hoodwinked," and "Happily N'ever After" put together, except that it focuses on one fairy tale.
And there's the fourth thing of course: IT'S A CGI COMEDY.
Now if it still plans to compete with Harry Potter come November...then I can see the flop potential.
- Disney's Divinity
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 16349
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
- Gender: Male
I'm not sure who would qualify as more of a celebrity than either Keith David, Oprah, John Goodman, or Jennifer Lewis. Mandy Moore is pretty well-known, but I'm not sure if she would be a positive (girly). And Zachary Levi? I honestly didn't know who he was before this movie.celebrity voices
Is it really? Or are the commercials only less girl-centric?less girl centric
To me, it has several things going against it: 1. It's Disney. 2. Harry Potter - The Last Movie, part 1 ("It's gonna be big"). And, which I think will ultimately have less impact than the other two, 3. The title and advertisements, which I'm expecting to be downright terrible (TP&TF's were, and it ended up being a good movie to me in the end). We'll see. Can't say I'm rooting for it, but it'll do what it'll do.

Listening to most often lately:
Christina Aguilera ~ "Cruz"
Sombr ~ "homewrecker"
Megan Moroney ~ "Beautiful Things"
- supertalies
- Special Edition
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 6:11 am
- Location: The Netherlands
GOD, I LOVE THAT ART! I SAW THAT ON DEVIART! TO HELL WITH THAT WORD, "TANGLED!" BRING THAT NAME, "RAPUNZEL," BACK AT ONCE, OR YOU ALL SHALL BE A DISGRACE TO WALT DISNEY, FOREVER, AND EVER, AND EVER! AND SHALL FALL TO DREAMWORKS ANIMATION AS WELL, INCLUDING THEIR NEXT MOVIE STARRING WILL FARRELL, "MEGAMIND!"sotiris2006 wrote:
Last edited by Polizzi on Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What, Tangled?

This is a fan art I created, courtesy to Disney's 50th animated movie, "Rapunzel (I strongly recommend that name besides, "Tangled")." This will also be a tribute to Rodrigo Yborra, who created that art. And sotiris2006, who uploaded that art.
-
MutantEnemy
- Special Edition
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:46 pm
- Location: West Palm Beach, FL
- Contact:
Sorry friend. I just don't have the taste buds on that new title, "Tangled." As a result, I make fun of it.MutantEnemy wrote:I have gone through such conflicting emotions on this name change!!!
At first I was all "This Sucks!!!", then I was all "Alright Fine!!!", now I'm all "Son of A Bitch, F*** This Noise!!!"
Anyone else bipolar on this issue???
I mean ultimately it's quality that matters but this is the 50th film!!!
- Elladorine
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4372
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
- Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
- Contact:
I'll most certainly take that as a compliment!Goliath wrote:Really? I always thought we were of the same age --and that's a compliment.enigmawing wrote:I guess I didn't spell it out but I'm 34
You're right about The Disney Afternoon of course. I loved the earlier shows but stopped watching in the late 90's, not because I'd lost interest in Disney, but because the new shows weren't nearly as good or ground-breaking as the older set.
Thanks.Polizzi wrote:How did you do that? It looks really cool.
w00t! What site are these coming from, by the way? I tried to look it up but had no luck.sotiris2006 wrote:New Tangled pics!!
I'll probably have trouble with the doll portion but I'll see what I can do.sotiris2006 wrote:enigmawing, could you once again work your magic on these images?
- Elladorine
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4372
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
- Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
- Contact:
Ah, thank you!sotiris2006 wrote:I've found these images on this blog: http://disneyfanmagazine.blogspot.com/
Ok, here's my shot at them . . . I left all the ones Disney put in out of laziness . . . not sure what was up with the silver heart but left that there too.


-
robster16
- Special Edition
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:09 pm
- Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Those two pics are godawfull! Especially the top picture. She looks deformed. I don't even have to know the real Rapunzel to know that these are incredibly bad drawings and VERY off model! Yikes!sotiris2006 wrote:New Tangled pics!!
enigmawing, could you once again work your magic on these images?
I can see the potential but this tells me absolutely nothing.












