You can't miss what you don't have.Rudy Matt wrote:
The problem is that you're happy with what you have -- when you don't know what you're missing.

Besides, there is absolutely nothing wrong with being happy with what you have.
Rudy Matt wrote:
The problem is that you're happy with what you have -- when you don't know what you're missing.
I'm not sure. I don't have HD cable - the only high definition stuff I get is the local channels (ABC, NBC, FOX, you know what I mean)... and for now that's enough as my TV actually doesn't suck at upscaling, so normal analog cable looks pretty good as-is. (I'm sure it can be better, but I watch DVDs more than TV anyway, so not a big deal)The Armageddon thing is odd. Is the version airing on HDTV an actual HD broadcast, or upscaled to HD? I know sometimes, some channels will do this.
Yes, some of us are odd that way-- We're actually content with what we're having. Since when is that a bad attitude? I was raised on that concept: "be happy with what you have". I was taught not to throw my money away by buying frivolous gadgets or other stuff I didn't need. I know what I'm "missing", I just decided I don't want it. Because I don't need it. (And yes, I do need a cell phone, but no, I don't need the latest $300 dollar iPhone which comes with camera, wireless internet and 200 new games.)Rudy Matt wrote:The problem is that you're happy with what you have -- when you don't know what you're missing.
Beware. Last time I said something like that, he accused me of pretending to be more noble than anyone else and he called me a communist.Chernabog_Rocks wrote:Now if we changed the scenario to where I was rich (god how I wish this was my situation) and could easily afford it, I still wouldn't buy it. At the moment it's a luxury item and I'd honestly rather spend the money on something more important like donating it to Wildlife Charities, or any Charity for that matter that needs it.
Looks like you've got competition then for the "Who's More Noble" contest, better get out your hypothetical rich person wallet and start donating to those charities!Goliath wrote:
Beware. Last time I said something like that, he accused me of pretending to be more noble than anyone else and he called me a communist.
The only truly Noble person is Donna. She was, after all, the most important woman in the universe. Without her...reality as we know it...gone in the blink of an eye (and special effects).Cherny wrote:Looks like you've got competition then for the "Who's More Noble" contest, better get out your hypothetical rich person wallet and start donating to those charities!Goliath wrote:
Beware. Last time I said something like that, he accused me of pretending to be more noble than anyone else and he called me a communist.
Just as long as during that blink there's no weeping angels aroundEscapay wrote: The only truly Noble person is Donna. She was, after all, the most important woman in the universe. Without her...reality as we know it...gone in the blink of an eye (and special effects).
albert
Agreed.Goliath wrote:Yes, some of us are odd that way-- We're actually content with what we're having. Since when is that a bad attitude? I was raised on that concept: "be happy with what you have". I was taught not to throw my money away by buying frivolous gadgets or other stuff I didn't need. I know what I'm "missing", I just decided I don't want it. Because I don't need it. (And yes, I do need a cell phone, but no, I don't need the latest $300 dollar iPhone which comes with camera, wireless internet and 200 new games.)Rudy Matt wrote:The problem is that you're happy with what you have -- when you don't know what you're missing.
Beware. Last time I said something like that, he accused me of pretending to be more noble than anyone else and he called me a communist.Chernabog_Rocks wrote:Now if we changed the scenario to where I was rich (god how I wish this was my situation) and could easily afford it, I still wouldn't buy it. At the moment it's a luxury item and I'd honestly rather spend the money on something more important like donating it to Wildlife Charities, or any Charity for that matter that needs it.
True, I had forgotten about Romana! However, if RTD is to be believed, she left E-Space and was President of Gallifrey during the Time War. Thank god it was never really addressed in the series, I'd love for Romana to return one day.netty wrote:But don't forget Escapay, Romana was the "Noblest Romana of them all" when she elected to stay in E-Space (wordplay on a Shakespeare quote).![]()
i agree and it's also not so bad to have the chance to sale the movies on two plattforms i guess. Also there are still titles which are only get released on dvd and not on blu ray. I agree, these are mostly not the most important releases, but still dvd isn't forgotten.Escapay wrote: Anyway, to remain on topic, Disney won't be done with DVD until they stop manufacturing them.![]()
albert