I doubt it, they said at the D23 Expo that the Hawaiian doll would be called Lulu, so I guess it's a female character.blackcauldron85 wrote:Either that article or one linked to it mentions Keanu Reeves playing a 2-3 inch tall character; maybe he's playing the "paper doll Hawaiian keychain nurse?"
Source: https://insidethemagic.net/2017/07/d23- ... doll-lulu/A making-of video shown to the crowd of fans revealed a glimpse of new paper doll-like character Lulu, and some scattered others.
Will the "biggest cinema moment in history" really be her death? She was more or a less a cameo role. So, I don't know if she would carry emotional gravity like Buzz and Woody. And why would they add her back in only to kill her off?
Source: https://superbromovies.com/2019/01/19/e ... adventure/While fans wait for the first full trailer, we have some news that should wet their appetite. We have some juicy plot details for Toy Story 4 to get you prepared for how the highly-anticipated sequel will follow up the near perfect third film.
After being given away by Andy to toddler Bonnie at the end of the last film, our favorite toys including Woody and Buzz Lightyear are having as much fun as ever taking care of their new kid. The gang is still there and fans will love seeing them together again. A problem arises when a new toy called “Forky”, voiced by Tony Hale, arrives at Bonnie’s room and throws their happy existence into chaos. He consists of a spork with pipe cleaners and isn’t by any means a regular toy. In fact, he doesn’t see himself as one at all. That doesn’t matter to Bonnie though, as he is thrown into the group for her enjoyment.
When the toys decide to go on one last trip to the outside world together, along with Forky, they meet new characters at a carnival. These new toys include prizes “Ducky” and “Bunny,” voiced by Keegan-Michael Key and Jordan Peele respectively. As they embark on their entertaining yet emotional journey, they will find out what it truly means to be a toy. It’s basically an existential crisis through the eyes of a toy and knowing Pixar it will likely be one to remember for years to come.
Although many were satisfied with Toy Story 3, there might be a story worth telling in the fourth installment. Knowing it’s likely the last time we’ll see the gang together is already enough to pull at the heartstrings so it becomes all that much more difficult to imagine how people will react when the credits start to roll.
Sounds like a concept related to breaking the 4th wall, but instead of staring at the audience or realizing they are in a movie, they becomes self aware of what they are. (I referred to this trend in this post: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32748)As they embark on their entertaining yet emotional journey, they will find out what it truly means to be a toy. It’s basically an existential crisis through the eyes of a toy
Source: https://toystoryfangirl.com/2019/01/22/ ... #more-1623“Surprisingly, my character is in it for a second. And they showed me the mock up of what they had – which is a little flashback, and it’s in the very beginning of the movie – and it made me cry.”
I wasn't (and I'm still not) too confident about this movie, but this sounds... intriguing. What it truly means to be a toy and how would they make me care for it?Sotiris wrote:they will find out what it truly means to be a toy
They've announced no such thing have they? I was under the impression they were done with those for now.Sotiris wrote:Well, those shorts are going to continue as well.Sky Syndrome wrote:I'd rather have shorts about the toys living at Molly's. Hawaiian Vacation is cute.
I don't agree. Barbie in toy story 2 versus in toy story 3 is a good example of a design that says early CG. I don't read that from bo. It says vintage like you say. Which is not the same thing as vintage CG. just an old porcelain figure.disneyprincess11 wrote:Her old design screams outdated. There's something about the shapes and the angle of her eyes and smile that reveals that this was designed when CGI was brand new. Her grayish skin doesn't help either. That being said, her old look is also vintage since her eyes are definitely painted and that detail is loss in the new design. I do agree with the Barbie doll comment.
They could have updated her design a bit without going this far as they've done with the rest of the characters over the years.disneyprincess11 wrote:In my opinion, however, Bo's old look would not hold up today. Her old design screams outdated.
They are. That was an old post. I assume that when Toy Story 4 went into production they decided to stop making more Toy Story Toons to build up anticipation and increase demand for the characters.Kyle wrote:They've announced no such thing have they? I was under the impression they were done with those for now.
Couldn't agree more.Kyle wrote:I don't read that from Bo. It says vintage like you say. Which is not the same thing as vintage CG. Just an old porcelain figure. Woody's design doesn't look modern either, you gonna redesign him as well? They updated him but only where it made sense but they changed nothing so drastically that he couldn't be posed to look like more or less like he did in the first two movies. This time with Bo she looks like a different toy altogether. Like some different toy company picked up the rights and made their own sculpt. If this is indeed the same Bo in our Toy Story canon she should not have been changed this much.
Why do you think they did that though? Perhaps Barbie doesn't appear in the 4th one and thus needed to make Bo more conventionally pretty and modern to sell dolls. 
