Tangled (formerly Rapunzel) Discussion - Part II
- Elladorine
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4372
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
- Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
- Contact:
At the risk of derailing this topic just a little further, how old are some of you complaining that people think Disney is for little kids? I only ask because Disney was like the coolest thing ever when I was in high school, back in the early 90's. I don't remember one single teenager (usually the most vicious of these groups) brushing off Disney as being for babies or teasing anyone for being too old for it, in fact Aladdin was a popular date movie, Beauty and the Beast was a big discussion topic in several classes, The Little Mermaid was adored, and just about everyone wanted to see The Lion King multiple times in the theater. Not to say that everyone was a Disney geek, but I was never looked down upon for being one myself.
Disney managed to change that mindset at least once since the early 80's and it looks like they need to figure out how all over again.
Disney managed to change that mindset at least once since the early 80's and it looks like they need to figure out how all over again.
- SmartAleck25
- Special Edition
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:02 pm
- Location: The U.S.
- Elladorine
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4372
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
- Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
- Contact:
I've always had the general feeling I'm about ten years older than a lot of people on this board.
But yeah, I can totally see a change in mindset, and it's a real shame. 
I recall something I'd heard years ago about Disney in the early 80's, that they interviewed people (I'm guessing in order to figure out how to increase ticket sales for both the films and the parks) and one young man (I'm guessing late teens/early 20's) said he absolutely loved Disney and couldn't wait until he had kids of his own so he'd have an excuse to go enjoy them once again.
Looks like we're facing the same issues today?
As I was saying, when I was a teen Disney was not only accepted, but was considered cool. A lot of cartoons in general were, now that I think about it. Way back when the Simpsons still aired on Sunday nights, everyone would be talking about the latest episode on Monday. Our drama class actually studied the themes in Beauty and the Beast, our art teacher was just as interested in Animaniacs as we were, we still loved the Disney Afternoon shows, and getting to bring in a Disney VHS (like Aladdin) to watch during class was actually exciting for everyone. I'm guessing a lot of that excitement peaked with the release of The Lion King . . . I'm not saying Pocahontas or the latter films were bad, but I don't think they had the same mass appeal as what we were given in the early 90's.
I was occasionally able to take my nieces to the theaters in the mid/late 90's for movies like Mulan. A few years later, I asked one of them if she'd be interested in going to see Treasure Planet, and she looked at me as if I was utterly insane. Maybe she wasn't interested in that particular film but I'm willing to bet she thought any Disney movies were for babies at that point. Whoops, guess she was too old and cool for Disney at the ripe old age of 12.
But to get back on topic, I'm wondering if a film like Tangled can help bring that "coolness" back to the Disney image.
I recall something I'd heard years ago about Disney in the early 80's, that they interviewed people (I'm guessing in order to figure out how to increase ticket sales for both the films and the parks) and one young man (I'm guessing late teens/early 20's) said he absolutely loved Disney and couldn't wait until he had kids of his own so he'd have an excuse to go enjoy them once again.
Looks like we're facing the same issues today?
As I was saying, when I was a teen Disney was not only accepted, but was considered cool. A lot of cartoons in general were, now that I think about it. Way back when the Simpsons still aired on Sunday nights, everyone would be talking about the latest episode on Monday. Our drama class actually studied the themes in Beauty and the Beast, our art teacher was just as interested in Animaniacs as we were, we still loved the Disney Afternoon shows, and getting to bring in a Disney VHS (like Aladdin) to watch during class was actually exciting for everyone. I'm guessing a lot of that excitement peaked with the release of The Lion King . . . I'm not saying Pocahontas or the latter films were bad, but I don't think they had the same mass appeal as what we were given in the early 90's.
I was occasionally able to take my nieces to the theaters in the mid/late 90's for movies like Mulan. A few years later, I asked one of them if she'd be interested in going to see Treasure Planet, and she looked at me as if I was utterly insane. Maybe she wasn't interested in that particular film but I'm willing to bet she thought any Disney movies were for babies at that point. Whoops, guess she was too old and cool for Disney at the ripe old age of 12.
But to get back on topic, I'm wondering if a film like Tangled can help bring that "coolness" back to the Disney image.
Last edited by Elladorine on Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
polish_princess
- Member
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:18 pm
I'm 32 and I think the original Disney movies (not counting sequels, prequels, etc) are much more for "older" viewers than the young. There are just so many subtleties (sp?), dark images, analogies, etc. that young viewers don't catch them all. Plus, my father adored Disney all the way to passing away at 75. He so wanted to be a Disney animator, but lost his depth perception in the Korean War
I think the "kiddie" movies part comes from the merchandising (I can barely find adult wares with princesses on them) and from the toned down sequels, Enchanted Tales, etc.
- Scarred4life
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 12:18 pm
-
yukitora
- Special Edition
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:01 am
- Location: at home apparently
- Contact:
I agree. My favourite Walt quote was something along the lines that he makes the film not necessary for children, but for the children in us all. So the target audience in mind was really everyone, not just adults nor children.polish_princess wrote:I'm 32 and I think the original Disney movies (not counting sequels, prequels, etc) are much more for "older" viewers than the young. There are just so many subtleties (sp?), dark images, analogies, etc. that young viewers don't catch them all. Plus, my father adored Disney all the way to passing away at 75. He so wanted to be a Disney animator, but lost his depth perception in the Korean WarI think the "kiddie" movies part comes from the merchandising (I can barely find adult wares with princesses on them) and from the toned down sequels, Enchanted Tales, etc.
So yeh in a way Disney's animation (though not necessary other companies) have been designed to reignite childhood fantasies, whether bright and bubbly or significantly darker (I mean gosho childhood is a nightmare).
I agree with you though all this merchandising and marketing makes it much harder to interest adults.
why would lack of depth perception affect ones ability to draw/animate? he might not have been able to view movies with 3d glasses, but if his vision was clear I dont see how it would have stopped him.polish_princess wrote: my father adored Disney all the way to passing away at 75. He so wanted to be a Disney animator, but lost his depth perception in the Korean War![]()
-
polish_princess
- Member
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:18 pm
There might have been more to it (I heard these things in my childhood), but I just know he couldn't draw as well after that.Kyle wrote:why would lack of depth perception affect ones ability to draw/animate? he might not have been able to view movies with 3d glasses, but if his vision was clear I dont see how it would have stopped him.polish_princess wrote: my father adored Disney all the way to passing away at 75. He so wanted to be a Disney animator, but lost his depth perception in the Korean War![]()
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
-
robster16
- Special Edition
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:09 pm
- Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
The brazilian version of the teaser trailer for "Tangled", dubbed in portugese, has hit the internet and surprise surprise, they gave the movie the title: "RAPUNZEL"...
http://www.planetadisney.net/noticia/ex ... e-tangled/
http://www.planetadisney.net/noticia/ex ... e-tangled/
-
PatrickvD
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5207
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
- Location: The Netherlands
only the US will get Tangledrobster16 wrote:The brazilian version of the teaser trailer for "Tangled", dubbed in portugese, has hit the internet and surprise surprise, they gave the movie the title: "RAPUNZEL"...
http://www.planetadisney.net/noticia/ex ... e-tangled/
So Brasil and France are confirming this as Rapunzel. The rest of the world will probably call it that as well.
Man, what a mess.
- disneyboy20022
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 6868
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:17 pm
Actually France I thought was getting Princess Rapunzel..PatrickvD wrote:only the US will get Tangledrobster16 wrote:The brazilian version of the teaser trailer for "Tangled", dubbed in portugese, has hit the internet and surprise surprise, they gave the movie the title: "RAPUNZEL"...
http://www.planetadisney.net/noticia/ex ... e-tangled/![]()
So Brasil and France are confirming this as Rapunzel. The rest of the world will probably call it that as well.
Man, what a mess.
and yes it is quite a mess...a very Tangled Mess
Want to Hear How I met Roy E. Disney in 2003? Click the link Below
http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
http://fromscreentotheme.com/ThursdayTr ... isney.aspx
- UmbrellaFish
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 5741
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
- Gender: Male (He/Him)
It's funny how much influence TPATF is having over Rapunzel. In America, TPATF didn't do very well, so they completely drop the protagonist's name from the title. In France, where TPATF took Avatar's spot at number one, I believe, it's name is being changed to Princess Rapunzel. You could probably predict Rapunzel/Tangled/Princess Rapunzel/Girl With Really Long Hair's title in the UK based on the grosses it made there.PatrickvD wrote:
only the US will get Tangled![]()
So Brasil and France are confirming this as Rapunzel. The rest of the world will probably call it that as well.
Man, what a mess.
Ohhh boy that would be so spectacular. We should boycott the American version of the home release and all import "Rapunzel" from somewhere else!Julian Carter wrote:I'm praying that the film will retain its original title too in the UK, as that's where I get my DVDs. And if it does, Americans with region-free capabilities can import the UK disc later on (if they're bothered with the "Tangled" title).
- schoollover
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:12 pm
- Location: manhaten, New York
Seeing the teaser trailer in the cinema literrally took my breath away ..... that was the magic and wonder of Disney coming alive again for me. I mean, I adored PatF ... but this was just pitched to the audience in a different way, and it certainly spoke to me.
Whether it be Tangled or Rapunzel, nothing will stop me from seeing this movie !!
Whether it be Tangled or Rapunzel, nothing will stop me from seeing this movie !!









