Disney's "The Snow Queen" in 2013?
-
- Special Edition
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:48 am
i completely agree megustajake!
The only Disney movies in the early 2000's that made profit were Emperor's New Groove and Lilo & Stitch ... Both movies where completely original and ENG is one of my favorite Disney movies. I think KOTE & SQ both have a very interesting and strong story and I do believe Disney is going in the right track since BOLT was released. I do think the Wreck-it Ralph plot seems a bit bland and I pray this does well for Disney.
The only Disney movies in the early 2000's that made profit were Emperor's New Groove and Lilo & Stitch ... Both movies where completely original and ENG is one of my favorite Disney movies. I think KOTE & SQ both have a very interesting and strong story and I do believe Disney is going in the right track since BOLT was released. I do think the Wreck-it Ralph plot seems a bit bland and I pray this does well for Disney.

All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them. - Walt Disney
-
- Limited Issue
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:00 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Rough animation of the Russian cgi film snow queen:
<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dhJP090_0Do" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Behind the scenes/tour of the company inlay films:
<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PetWkEwiogs" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dhJP090_0Do" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Behind the scenes/tour of the company inlay films:
<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PetWkEwiogs" frameborder="0"></iframe>
fatcaketom.blogspot.com
- ajmrowland
- Signature Collection
- Posts: 8177
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
- Location: Appleton, WI
Harry Potter can still be considered above average cinema.Disney's Divinity wrote:Of course, I personally don't feel TP&TF was bland, but I still don't think the quality of a film really decides it's success/failure many times over. Otherwise the Twilight, Shrek, and Chipmunk films would be considered some of the best films of all time. *scared*

Don't you ever talk shit about Harry Potter.Disney's Divinity wrote:Of course, I personally don't feel TP&TF was bland, but I still don't think the quality of a film really decides it's success/failure many times over. Otherwise the HP, Shrek, and Chipmunk films would be considered some of the best films of all time. *scared* On the other hand, there are many films that are good that do well, so it's hard to explain.

- Disney's Divinity
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 16239
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
- Gender: Male
Sorry, the films are awful. Sort of like Transformers--all effects and no substance, though I would say the series picked up a little with HBP. But they are very nice effects. Well, that's exaggerating (
); only films 4 and 5 are awful. The rest are moderately good to great. Still, it’s a shame though. They have so many incredible actors, but nearly all of them are underused.
The Twilight films are horrible--I've unfortunately seen them because my mother loves the series--so I don’t mind the replacement. Although I’m thinking watching the films is the better option over reading the books, really.
Am I the only one who thinks the designs for that Russian film look bad? I know that's rough animation, but still.

The Twilight films are horrible--I've unfortunately seen them because my mother loves the series--so I don’t mind the replacement. Although I’m thinking watching the films is the better option over reading the books, really.

Am I the only one who thinks the designs for that Russian film look bad? I know that's rough animation, but still.

Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
- Super Aurora
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4835
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am
SWillie! wrote:Don't you ever talk shit about Harry Potter.Disney's Divinity wrote:Of course, I personally don't feel TP&TF was bland, but I still don't think the quality of a film really decides it's success/failure many times over. Otherwise the HP, Shrek, and Chipmunk films would be considered some of the best films of all time. *scared* On the other hand, there are many films that are good that do well, so it's hard to explain.
HP is overrated.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
- Sotiris
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 21073
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:06 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Fantasyland
July 08, 2011
Source: http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2011/ ... -road.htmlHonor Hunter wrote:Based on the current state of projects, a CG version of "Snow Queen" directed by Chris Buck is likely to see release sometime during the year. The story structure problems that popped up in the last hand-drawn version seem to be ironed out and storyboarding has moved forward with Chris' unique take on the material. And for those of you wondering if it'll be faithful to the original story? I can only say that it'll be as faithful to it as the Mouse was to "The Little Mermaid."
Last edited by Sotiris on Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- DisneyJedi
- Platinum Edition
- Posts: 3737
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:53 pm
- Gender: Male
- Dream Huntress
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere
This might turn out for the better. Snow Queen will probably turn out as good as Rapunzel for the most part.
But if we just saw this in hand drawn it would be more of the same. I don't know about you guys but I want a new idea for the next hand drawn movie, a non fairy tale. We just had a slew of them, so I don't think its unreasonable to want a bit of a break from that.
But if we just saw this in hand drawn it would be more of the same. I don't know about you guys but I want a new idea for the next hand drawn movie, a non fairy tale. We just had a slew of them, so I don't think its unreasonable to want a bit of a break from that.
- Disney's Divinity
- Ultimate Collector's Edition
- Posts: 16239
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:26 am
- Gender: Male
How is the film being CG make it any better than it would have been in 2D? You mean, just because it's in CG, it wouldn't be "more of the same" even though the last CG film they had was also a fairy tale?
What bs. Too bad the next HCA story they chose couldn't have been a 2D feature. At least there's The Little Match Girl.

The story structure problems that popped up in the last hand-drawn version seem to be ironed out

What bs. Too bad the next HCA story they chose couldn't have been a 2D feature. At least there's The Little Match Girl.

Listening to most often lately:
Taylor Swift ~ ~ "The Fate of Ophelia"
Taylor Swift ~ "Eldest Daughter"
Taylor Swift ~ "CANCELLED!"
-
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:47 am
- Location: UK
- Contact:
The designs don't look great, but it is a low budget production with not that great a many experienced or highly trained animator. It's obviously going to pale against the likes of Pixar, Disney or Dreamworks.Disney's Divinity wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the designs for that Russian film look bad? I know that's rough animation, but still.
- Prince Edward
- Anniversary Edition
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:23 pm
- Location: Trondheim, Norway
- Contact:
Major dissapointment that The Snow Queen won't be in 2D. A shame really to not make this Hans Christian Andersen fairytale in 2D. It would have been a great opportunity to showcase traditional animation. But it seems Disney have abandoned the medium, it's like they don't have any faith or believe in it anymore. If they market the movie well and if the movie is good, then the medium (2D or CGI/3D) should not make any difference regarding the financial success.
Favorite Disney-movies: Snow White, Cinderella, Alice in Wonderland, Sleeping Beauty, The Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, Pocahontas, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Hercules, Mulan, Tarzan, Tangled, Frozen, Pirates, Enchanted, Prince of Persia, Tron, Oz The Great and Powerful
- Candy-Bonita95
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:45 am
- Location: Toronto
True,what bs.Disney's Divinity wrote:How is the film being CG make it any better than it would have been in 2D? You mean, just because it's in CG, it wouldn't be "more of the same" even though the last CG film they had was also a fairy tale?![]()
The story structure problems that popped up in the last hand-drawn version seem to be ironed out![]()
What bs. Too bad the next HCA story they chose couldn't have been a 2D feature. At least there's The Little Match Girl.

Here's a list of other cancelled Disney films that were never fully explained.
1.Don Qixoute
2.The Kingdom of The Sun
3.Newt
4.Where The Wild Things Are
5.Walt's version of Beauty and the Beast
6.Fraidy Cat.
Apparently, Kingdom of the Sun was cancelled because it was too cliched and the story seemed to be taking itself too seriously, hence the addition of Mark Dandal as a director.Candy-Bonita95 wrote: Here's a list of other cancelled Disney films that were never fully explained.
2.The Kingdom of The Sun
3.Newt
4.Where The Wild Things Are
6.Fraidy Cat.
Newt was cancelled, because the story line was too similar to Rio.
I think Where the Wild Things Are was just a test on John Lasseter's part. The Brave Little Toaster was what he intended as his first feature and what ultimately got him fired from Disney.
Fraidy Cat was cancelled, because it was apparently not marketable enough, according to the Disney executives of the time.
"There are two wolves and they are always fighting. One is darkness and despair. The other is light and hope. Which wolf wins? Whichever one you feed." - Casey Newton, Tomorrowland
- Candy-Bonita95
- Gold Classic Collection
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:45 am
- Location: Toronto
Thanks for correcting me.But yikes!The Brave Little Toaster got Lasseter fired?That movie is a classic.I think Where the Wild Things Are was just a test on John Lasseter's part. The Brave Little Toaster was what he intended as his first feature and what ultimately got him fired from Disney.
Honor Hunter is right about everything he says about 99% percent of the time. It's pretty legit.

You have to agree that it's hard to believe!We don't know the problems the narrative had.I guess we will have to wait.The story structure problems that popped up in the last hand-drawn version seem to be ironed out
- Super Aurora
- Diamond Edition
- Posts: 4835
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am
Candy-Bonita95 wrote: Here's a list of other cancelled Disney films that were never fully explained.
1.Don Qixoute
2.The Kingdom of The Sun
3.Newt
4.Where The Wild Things Are
5.Walt's version of Beauty and the Beast
6.Fraidy Cat.
There were more than just that list on of ones that never got a chance to be develop
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif