You're right with that last sentence. But there *is* a difference. I will always continue to challenge myself -and invite others to challenge me- on topics like politics, current events, interpreting history, art, literature, music, etc. None of the beliefs I currently held on those, and many other, subjects, are set in stone.Disney Duster wrote:As for what you said about you being right about certain things and certain things being undeniable...
It is nice, it is nice to believe it's not just opinion and you know the truth and what's right. And you can, we should believe that the good things are right. But someday some of the things you thought were right may be proven wrong. After all, you have not believed all the same exact things your whole life.
But I do drawn the line at some key things I listed above. That's because on all those issues, the jury is out on them. Just because a tiny minority still questions them, doesn't mean that 99% of professionals working in those areas (scientists, researchers, scholars etc.) aren't agreeing on them. Because they are. And you're completely right when you say: "that mght change someday". But we've had that discussion before, and that's just the way science works. We have now a 99% consensus by all the experts on those issues and until that changes, it stands. And I'll stand by it.
As for the last point about cultures: I'm not one to say our Western culture is perfect. Far from that; I think people on this board know about that. I'm not like some populist politicians you see in increasingly more Western countries who declare 'our culture' off-limits for criticism. But I dare anybody to debate me that democracy, equal rights for all people, and freedom of speech is *not* better than dictatorship, no human rights, and censorship (as imperfect as they are in our societies).








