SWillie! wrote:Disney's Divinity is secretly David Kawena.


SWillie! wrote:Disney's Divinity is secretly David Kawena.
Well, if you ask me, they're just chickenpoop!Sotiris wrote:The reason Disney would never even consider this project is not because they've stopped producing hand-drawn animation but because they have a policy to never hear pitches from anyone outside the studio.After months working on it, with hundreds and hundreds of storyboards and concept art, the Disney Animation hand drawn studios closed its doors. So there was no point for us to even show that project
It's more about legal issues than being chickenpoop.TsWade2 wrote:Well, if you ask me, they're just chickenpoop!
I agree. It's clearly a matter of taste and the set of aesthetics one adheres to. Personally, I prefer hand-drawn animation to CG or stop-motion but I don't consider it superior to the others. Every animation medium has its strengths and limitations and ideally the medium chosen serves the nature of the story first and foremost.Disney's Divinity wrote:Besides, even if that were the case, he wouldn’t need approval to prefer one medium over another; there is such a thing as personal taste. Moreover, I think it's outrageous to call him a hypocrite because of it. As far as I know, he could care less about most live-action Disney films at all. I find you to be the hypocrite for dismissing someone just because he doesn't cater to your view of what a Disney fan should be, based on vague ideas taken from a deviant art account.
I do agree with this. I'm always one to discourage criticism before we have anything to go off of. That should apply here as well.Disney's Divinity wrote:@FH: As far as I know, we haven't been given any details about what story or otherwise they might have used the concept to tell, except that they were going for something that was "artistic, classy but very funny"; all we have is a title to go on. I find it hard to define whether it would be capable of having a logical and appealing movie narrative based on the nothing we've been given. Isn’t this what people usually profess around here to stifle criticism--you can’t judge anything until you see a final product? At least let’s be consistent and leave off criticizing a project that we haven’t been given any details on other than a couple of pieces of concept art and which will never see the light of day anyway.
But the basic plot and some ideas have been shown, which is what I've been criticizing. That's how most projects are first judged by the company when new ideas are presented.Disney's Divinity wrote:@FH: As far as I know, we haven't been given any details about what story or otherwise they might have used the concept to tell, except that they were going for something that was "artistic, classy but very funny"; all we have is a title to go on. I find it hard to define whether it would be capable of having a logical and appealing movie narrative based on the nothing we've been given. Isn’t this what people usually profess around here to stifle criticism--you can’t judge anything until you see a final product? At least let’s be consistent and leave off criticizing a project that we haven’t been given any details on other than a couple of pieces of concept art and which will never see the light of day anyway.
Oh, then I do agree with you.SWillie! wrote:No, I don't mean that. I just meant specifically with Rapunzel, given the history of the character and the film. The fact that he developed the story for so long in multiple versions, and the character herself is such a labor of love, and then he never got animate her the way he wanted to... I just think that if Rapunzel ever did have some sort of hand drawn cameo in something, it should be Glen. I'm sure there are others that could do it, but since Glen is gone now I'd love to see him come back for something like that.
also kh has original ideas and characters withvdisney ss backdrop.Flanger-Hanger wrote:As stand alone artwork for yourself or a small group of people, this stuff is fine and nice, but as a movie narrative that tries to have some logic and appeal to it beyond those who can name everyone featured, it's not very good.
It doesn't make sense (why does someone like Jessie want to be a "princess"?), it's not very creative and would just be another example of Disney cashing in on older ideas instead of creating new characters.
As merch or short clips it's OK, but I'm glad Disney didn't make a short movie or series out of it.
KH works because there's the added element of game play and participation on the part of the viewer and the cross-over element is more self contained to the different levels and less about seeing everyone at one all the time together. Theme park shows also work better because they're based more on spectacle than plot and again, the cross-overs are more limited in frequency and number.
ajmrowland wrote:also kh has original ideas and characters withvdisney ss backdrop.Flanger-Hanger wrote:As stand alone artwork for yourself or a small group of people, this stuff is fine and nice, but as a movie narrative that tries to have some logic and appeal to it beyond those who can name everyone featured, it's not very good.
It doesn't make sense (why does someone like Jessie want to be a "princess"?), it's not very creative and would just be another example of Disney cashing in on older ideas instead of creating new characters.
As merch or short clips it's OK, but I'm glad Disney didn't make a short movie or series out of it.
KH works because there's the added element of game play and participation on the part of the viewer and the cross-over element is more self contained to the different levels and less about seeing everyone at one all the time together. Theme park shows also work better because they're based more on spectacle than plot and again, the cross-overs are more limited in frequency and number.
No it's not. KH is a cluster fuck fanfic wet dream with a convoluted plot with generic bishie characters. Having western animation and Japanese integrate doesn't make something original, especially with crap contents in it.thelittleursula wrote:KH is pretty original.
Western animation and Japanese RPG don't usually team up.
you passionately hate so you clearly dont play the games. Thats just common sense. You cant claim to reallyknow that much about the series unless for some reason you actually care.Super Aurora wrote:No it's not. KH is a cluster fuck fanfic wet dream with a convoluted plot with generic bishie characters. Having western animation and Japanese integrate doesn't make something original, especially with crap contents in it.thelittleursula wrote:KH is pretty original.
Western animation and Japanese RPG don't usually team up.