Disney Duster wrote:This is still going? Anyway, sorry Goliath but you're still wrong. I didn't do what you're saying and the only way to rebutt it is to say your conclusion is wrong about me, you made a wrong saying about me. That's all I gotta do. Sorry dude, what you said is just is plainly not true. I already rebutted you much mroe before that and you shot back with the same wrong things.
Yeah, yeah, yeah... I'm "just" "wrong"... blah blah blah... Another magnificent response full of rationality, arguments, facts and sources brought to us by the Disney Essence of Disney Duster...
Jackoleen wrote:* If a buff, sexy, ripped man walked into a bar wearing only a Speedo, and some cruel woman slipped him a date rape drug, helped him into her car, took him to a hotel room, and raped him while he was half-conscious, would the same people who claim that "a WOMAN'S clothes do NOT send messages of sluttitude, or invite rape and attract sick men!" be saying that said MAN did NOT deserve to be raped, or would they be laughing, and saying, "Oooh, now THAT dumb Jock was ASKIN' for it! How STUPID he was! He brought it on all by HIMSELF, and to think that he could've dressed RESPECTABLY!"?
Of course I would say the same things about a man! Why should the gender of the person change anything?
Oh, and I don't care for your self-hatred --which is how I define your over-the-top hatred of powerful women who are in charge of their own bodies and minds and your constant confusion of female empowerment with "man bashing" (boo hoo, men have it so hard!). Because being a woman and still wanting to be treated as if 100 years of feminism have not existed, defines self-hatred to me. It's like if I was asking my boss to treat me the same way employees were treated in the 19th century, when they had no rights at all (jpanimation's favorite time).
Jackoleen wrote:* "The Baby Bump"/ "Pregnancy Worship"/ The invisibility of women who cannot have/ don't want children
* The idea that women should only be mothers, who must constantly think of nothing but protecting their children at all costs.
This, however, are two very rare spurts of sense in your otherwise incoherent rambling that I happen to agree with.
Thank you in advance for your reply. Feel free to blast me out of the water.
