Disney Males

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
User avatar
Flanger-Hanger
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3746
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Location: S.H.I.E.L.D. Headquarters

Re: Disney Males

Post by Flanger-Hanger »

Disney's Divinity wrote:Anyway, I wonder who he's based on? He doesn't exactly look like Joseph Gordon Levitt, although there is a similarity.
I don't see it myself ( :lol: ), but I'm curious too about who (or whom) he's based on.

Joseph's voice however is so perfect in my opinion for the part, just like Jodi Benson was for Ariel.
Image
User avatar
Escapay
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 12562
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Somewhere in Time and Space
Contact:

Re: Disney Males

Post by Escapay »

Disney Duster wrote:HEY Helene Stanley was also a live-action reference model for Cinderella! Did you watch the Mickey Mouse Club bonus feature on the Cinderella DVD...or watch the making of?
Don't know how I missed this. Honestly, I was just typing on auto-pilot and my brain associated Ilene Woods with live-action reference model without remembering that Helene Stanley did it. Also, I haven't watched the DVD for Cinderella as often as I have Sleeping Beauty, so I always remembered watching the 47-second clip of Stanley as Briar Rose as opposed to the "Mickey Mouse Club" excerpt where she sings "The Work Song" (which is ironic as it's one of my favorite bonuses in the Cinderella DVD). I think the last time I watched the Cinderella documentary was 2008.

albert
WIST #60:
AwallaceUNC: Would you prefer Substi-Blu-tiary Locomotion? :p

WIST #61:
TheSequelOfDisney: Damn, did Lin-Manuel Miranda go and murder all your families?
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

On sexuality, I agree with Goliath. Films are given PG-13 and R ratings, even though they have people being beaten, stabbed, beheaded, mutated, their faces removed, and horribly mutilated, but all it takes to get an R is a boob-something which even 6 yr old boys are aware of- and an NC-17 is bodily fluids, which we all discover in our early teens, even younger.

I like Jim Hawkins as a character. Maybe it's because I'm not too far from his age, but that movie is not nearly as bad as people say it is, IMO.
Image
Lazario

Post by Lazario »

Disney Duster wrote:Let's see. Goliath comes into a thread called Disney MALES.
Then he starts crying where are the females?
And then he re-posts a picture of an animated vagina in this thread about Disney males, instead of leaving the link to it alone.
It is hard for me to pinpoint if it is homophobia, insecurity, or closetedness.
Oh Duster, BE CAREFUL. Not even I go that far!

Some posters on this board just want equal representation. Of course, again, to get it they should not be afraid to start their own thing. So long as it's likely to promote actual discussion. Otherwise- send it to Polls & Games.

disneyboy20022 wrote:Sometimes...I think this forum needs this guy as a Ref or a mod on the forums... :P

<img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_JtqnQLlLUwk/S ... 60x491.jpg" width="300" height="225" border="0">

this...would be one of those sometimes... :P
Man - that was WAY too obvious.

Duckburger wrote:I choose hornyness :lol:
Is it too late to call a second vote on that?

Disney Duster wrote:going into gay threads to talk about how much you like lesbians
You've got a point there. It's either a mocking of the popularity of the thread or an expression of feeling excluded in some way. Oh and if it's not either of those things (which I'm doubtful of), then maybe some members should think about that before they click the Submit button.

Of course we also have to be careful of the word "homophobe." Even when it's directed toward people who threaten others with violence, sometimes it's overused. We need to expand our vocabularies here.

Disney's Divinity wrote:
Goliath wrote:I reposted it to protest the "won't somebody think of the children!!!!1!1"-attitude by Disney Duster.
Is that a bad thing though? I mean, I know you've joked about how people think violence is more acceptable than sex for children, but I personally think they can both be equally harmful for children to grow up around. Minimal exposure is a good thing, but I wouldn't agree with explicit sexuality in a film aimed towards children either. (Though I guess Mermaid doesn't really fall in that category, so I suppose I'm off-topic here; :P )
I know a lot of kids who were exposed to hardcore pornography at an early age and still turned out completely normal. :) I'm one of them.

But I never got straight porn, obviously. Even at 10 (or whatever I was), I just kept fast-forwarding through, waiting for something to happen. It was very boring. I actually thought it was a real movie and didn't think anything of the long shots with very few cut-aways.
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

I didnt start that until I was about 15, but I guess I had other things on my mind.
Image
Lazario

Post by Lazario »

ajmrowland wrote:I guess I had other things on my mind.
Didn't we all?
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

I think this image best represent this debate drama:

Image
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

Super Aurora wrote:I think this image best represent this debate drama:
A little red cross?
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

damn link broken. let me fixed that


Here were go:

Image
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
Post Reply