The Sword in the Stone SE DVD Discussion

271286 · Post by **271286** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:27 am

OMG! What's up with this cover? It's totally WRONG! The charaters are completely off model... It's so airbrushed it almost looks like CGI animation... and WHAT'S UP WITH THE LOGO?? It looks like a logo for World of Warcraft or something... TOTALLY wrong... and very untrue to the movie...

Lazario · Post by **Lazario** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:47 am

Widdi wrote:Is that really the cover art? The colors are wonderful but Arthur and Merlin are so off model it hurts! And nobody is on the spine? And what's with that weird new logo?

Completely agree.

As for the movie... If Fox and the Hound and The Aristocats deserve new discs, The Sword and the Stone does as well. As a kid, it was always one of my favorite movies. As an adult... Some of the songs are off, the squirrel sequence does nothing for me, and, well, is it me, or is Arthur's constant stream of "woah wu-wu woe-ooh a-oh woe!" really annoying? He does it once every 4 minutes. See for yourself, it's true. This is only corrected when he's turned into a bird.

merlinjones · Post by **merlinjones** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:30 am

Awful cover! Why can't they get these things right?

Ariel'sprince · Post by **Ariel'sprince** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:30 pm

Wow,the new cover is horrible

it looks a video tape from 20 years ago

.

Flanger-Hanger · Post by **Flanger-Hanger** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:03 pm

Lazario wrote: and, well, is it me, or is Arthur's constant stream of "woah wu-wu woe-ooh a-oh woe!" really annoying?

Ha! Your so right! It may have been just used allot to save money. But I think it's a good running gag. That and Wart's voice changing every four lines.

SwordInTheStone777 · Post by **SwordInTheStone777** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:28 pm

Flanger-Hanger wrote:

Ha! Your so right! It may have been just used allot to save money. But I think it's a good running gag. That and Wart's voice changing every four lines.

I never really noticed his voice changing until I watched it again back in 2005.

Maybe this DVD should have a featurette called The Many Voices of Wart

side not here: flanger is walle watching Hello Dolly in your banner?

SpringHeelJack · Post by **SpringHeelJack** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:39 pm

WALL*E loves "Hello, Dolly!". As well he should.

SwordInTheStone777 · Post by **SwordInTheStone777** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:48 pm

Hello Dolly isn't Disney, its 20th Century Fox!

Disneykid · Post by **Disneykid** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:10 pm

SwordInTheStone777 wrote:Hello Dolly isn't Disney, its 20th Century Fox!

And Belle loves Shakespeare, who has yet to have any of his stories adapted by Disney (Lion King notwithstanding). Do all Disney characters have to be fans of other Disney properties?

SpringHeelJack · Post by **SpringHeelJack** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:14 pm

SwordInTheStone777 wrote:Hello Dolly isn't Disney, its 20th Century Fox!

WHAAAAAAAAAAAT?!?!?!?

I'm glad they aren't using a Disney film. It'd look like a forced example of synergy.

Disneykid wrote:And Belle loves Shakespeare, who has yet to have any of his stories adapted by Disney (Lion King notwithstanding). Do all Disney characters have to be fans of other Disney properties?

Actually, on second thought, it would be kind of cool if Belle were a fan of, say, "The Black Cauldron". That'd be a great cross-promotion for an unloved Disney film. And maybe in "Bolt", the titular dog and his misfit friends can all enjoy quality ABC programming when in Hollywood, and maybe even stop for a day out at Disney's California Adventure to boost sagging sales.

...don't get any ideas, Disney.

TonyWDA · Post by **TonyWDA** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:25 pm

SpringHeelJack wrote:
SwordInTheStone777 wrote:Hello Dolly isn't Disney, its 20th Century Fox!
WHAAAAAAAAAAAT?!?!?!?

I'm glad they aren't using a Disney film. It'd look like a forced example of synergy.

Disneykid wrote:And Belle loves Shakespeare, who has yet to have any of his stories adapted by Disney (Lion King notwithstanding). Do all Disney characters have to be fans of other Disney properties?
Actually, on second thought, it would be kind of cool if Belle were a fan of, say, "The Black Cauldron". That'd be a great cross-promotion for an unloved Disney film. And maybe in "Bolt", the titular dog and his misfit friends can all enjoy quality ABC programming when in Hollywood, and maybe even stop for a day out at Disney's California Adventure to boost sagging sales.

...don't get any ideas, Disney.

Okay, guys, were getting off topic here. No offense, it's just this is about "The Sword in the Stone" SE DVD.

SpringHeelJack · Post by **SpringHeelJack** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:27 pm

You think that's bad, go see the "Beauty and the Beast" Academy Award topic.

P.S. I'm offended.

TonyWDA · Post by **TonyWDA** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:33 pm

SpringHeelJack wrote:You think that's bad, go see the "Beauty and the Beast" Academy Award topic.

P.S. I'm offended.

Well, I don't think it's as bad as that, lol.

P.S. Sorry.

It's just then this becomes a dumping place for just any conversation, not that it isn't interesting tough!

Flanger-Hanger · Post by **Flanger-Hanger** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:40 pm

SwordInTheStone777 wrote:
side not here: flanger is walle watching Hello, Dolly! in your banner?

Why not. Wall*E likes his musicals from the 60s.

TonyWDA · Post by **TonyWDA** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:45 pm

Flanger-Hanger wrote:
SwordInTheStone777 wrote:
side not here: flanger is walle watching Hello, Dolly! in your banner?
Why not. Wall*E likes his musicals from the 60s.

This is my point exactly...

Flanger-Hanger · Post by **Flanger-Hanger** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:58 pm

TonyWDA wrote:
This is my point exactly...

Because he just does it's his favorite movie to watch (he has a VHS which apparently still works 700 years from now and has the same picture quality as my current DVD copy.) That movie and the junk he finds while cleaning up are the only things he knows about humans. Why Pixar chose this movie I don't know but hopefully they will explain on the DVD. My theory is that it is an over-the-top musical that despite having no fantasy elements is still hugely unrealistic and still is a well known movie today so the audience would get the joke.

akhenaten · Post by **akhenaten** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:19 pm

i have this belief that all disney animated features should be pure of outside elements..heck even the inclusion of elvis songs in lilo irks me..but if hello dolly is the last remanining motion picture evidence on eath..i pity mankind.

as for the new cover...its sad disney is resorting to the current fad of king arthur and harry potter for the poster approach..but even back then alice had a psychedellic theme for the 60s flower power demograph

i wonder who's going to fart for the trailer this time around? im betting its sir ector.

TonyWDA · Post by **TonyWDA** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:40 pm

akhenaten wrote:as for the new cover...its sad disney is resorting to the current fad of king arthur and harry potter for the poster approach..but even back then alice had a psychedellic theme for the 60s flower power demograph

i wonder who's going to fart for the trailer this time around? im betting its sir ector.

Remember, that's NOT the final cover, this happens with almost every new release: it's just a draft.

akhenaten · Post by **akhenaten** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:05 pm

yeap i do realize that..but usually the final cover is 10% correction.if only theyd show us the draft for pocahontas dvd cover..the pocahontas PE (teeheehee) is the mother of all bad covers.

SpringHeelJack · Post by **SpringHeelJack** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:09 pm

TonyWDA wrote:P.S. Sorry. It's just then this becomes a dumping place for just any conversation, not that it isn't interesting tough!

I wasn't really offended, I was just j/king. Every topic here keeps shifting. C'est la vie.

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

The Sword in the Stone SE DVD Discussion