What sequels would you like to see?

Isidour · Post by **Isidour** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:43 pm

A "home in the range" one...
I really doubt that they could do any worse this alsready creepy movie

....well, who knows, Disn er Corp. has that magic touch for all the sequels

Robin Hood · Post by **Robin Hood** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:48 pm

Robin Hood 2
The Aristocats 2

Say no to DTV.

Escapay · Post by **Escapay** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:13 pm

Alan wrote:
Robin Hood wrote: Please tell me you are kidding!
Well, I want to see what happened after their marriage. It doesn't have to be a DTV.

Disney finished the movie about halfway through the original Perrault story, so a sequel, inane as it is, is possible for Sleeping Beauty.

IIRC, the second half of the Perraut story features the prince always going "hunting", when in reality he visits his new wife, and eventually they have two children (son and daughter). At that point he decides to tell his family about his other family, and brings them to live at his castle. But his mother is an ogress or something, and when the prince goes to fight a battle, she decides to eat her grandchildren, so she sends the cook to take them and prepare them for a dish. The cook saves the children (and eventually the princess, as the ogress wants to eat her too), and when the prince comes back, the ogress tells him his family was killed (I think). And somehow they all live happily ever after when they find out the family is alive, and the ogress ends up dying in a vat of snakes or something.

Uh..never mind. I don't think I'd like to see a Sleeping Beauty sequel after all...

Escapay

Robin Hood · Post by **Robin Hood** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:43 pm

Timon/Pumba fan wrote:But the real tragedy wasn't Eva Gabor, but John Candy! He was subpurb as Wilbur! R.I.P!

No offense, but that was kind of rude.

dvdjunkie · Post by **dvdjunkie** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:03 am

I just wanna repeat what MickeyMouseBoy said - "NO MORE SEQUELS!!"

The only way I would even think about a sequel is if they took their time and did it right and then put it in the theater first. No theater, no sequel. Sequels are just a poor excuse for laziness for the writers.

Originality be damned!! Let's do a sequel!! I think not. I can't think of one animated sequel besides "The Rescuers Down Under" that was really worth having in my collection. (Looks around and then.........) I have two or three and that is it. And I don't think they get played that much.

There are too many stories to be made into movies for them to turn to making a sequel of a movie for the sake of big bucks.

memnv · Post by **memnv** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:14 am

I am looking Forward to Toy Story 3 and I wouldn't mind more of the Incredibles

Enchantress · Post by **Enchantress** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:01 am

I'd rather that Disney didn't make any more sequels, but then again, Disney is a company, so they will only make sequels if they make more money back from it than they put in, so if everyone stopped buying them, we probably wouldn't get half as much. I don't really mind though, i don't want to see it, i don't buy it

Isidour · Post by **Isidour** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:44 pm

If only all people could think like you...

I wonder if in the future would be any kid who have seen a Classic Disney movie without even being interested in all the sequels...

Timon/Pumbaa fan · Post by **Timon/Pumbaa fan** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:11 pm

Robin Hood wrote:
Timon/Pumba fan wrote:But the real tragedy wasn't Eva Gabor, but John Candy! He was subpurb as Wilbur! R.I.P!

No offense, but that was kind of rude.

Oh sorry. I didn't mean Eva Gabor dying wasn't sad, in fact I like Eva Gabor, however I felt a little more sad for John Candy since I liked his voice recordings for Wilbur a little more than Eva Gabor's that's all. I'm sorry if you(or anyone else) got offended.

dvdjunkie wrote: O I can't think of one animated sequel besides "The Rescuers Down Under" that was really worth having in my collection.

How about Fantasia 2000? I loved it! Almost as much as the original.

However I agree that we really don't need sequels. I personally think they should stop making sequels to Walt's movies. I mean Fantasia 2000 was an exception because Walt HAD plans for a sequel, but they got cancelled when Fantasia flopped.

However, aside from that, Walt admitted that he HATED sequels. I mean he said that if the audiences wanted a sequel to Snow White, he'd rerelease it in theaters, and make the original Snow White the sequel. He did make a sequel to "The Three Little Pigs", however he did say, "How can you top pigs with pigs"?

I think if he really hated sequels so much, than why does Disney keep insulting Walt with these sequels, oh yeah I forgot, it's all about $$$!

As for Disney's animated movies after Walt, I wouldn't mind sequels if thought and hard work goes through into making these movies like "Down Under". But if Disney has to rely on their Television market to make these sequels, I can only hope Pixar will get back with Disney to make sequels.

Robin Hood · Post by **Robin Hood** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:14 pm

Timon/Pumba fan wrote:Oh sorry. I didn't mean Eva Gabor dying wasn't sad, in fact I like Eva Gabor, however I felt a little more sad for John Candy since I liked his voice recordings for Wilbur a little more than Eva Gabor's that's all. I'm sorry if you(or anyone else) got offended.

Oh sorry, I thought you meant something else.

anger is pointless · Post by **anger is pointless** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:39 pm

NO MORE SEQUElS PLEASE

there cant be another sequel to the rescuers cause two of the voice actors are gone now and no one can take thier place ever

dvdjunkie · Post by **dvdjunkie** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:37 am

"Fantasia 2000" was not a sequel. While it included some of the music from the original, it still was created with new music and animation and not supposed to be a sequel, but rather an update of "Fantasia". I own the Fantasia Box set and consider it to be a 'lost' treasure nowadays.

I don't think "Fantasia" or "Fantasia 2000" were ever really, truly appreciated.

Isidour · Post by **Isidour** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:29 am

at least not as cartoon movies because of the "Disney concept" would be for the normal people, but as a lightly artistic job.

idobelieveinfairiesido · Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:00 pm

personally i havnt really liked any sequels!! there are never as good or near as good as the film!

Timon/Pumbaa fan · Post by **Timon/Pumbaa fan** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:11 pm

dvdjunkie wrote:"Fantasia 2000" was not a sequel. While it included some of the music from the original, it still was created with new music and animation and not supposed to be a sequel, but rather an update of "Fantasia".

Then could you please give your definition of a seqeul? I mean you seem to think Fantaisa 2000 isn't a sequel because it updates the original. Well the films "Dumb and Dumberer", "Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle", "Son of the Mask" "Cinderella 2: Dreams Come Ture" and "2 Fast 2 Furious" all update the original but yet nobody likes those movies.

Aside from, "The Sorcerer's Apprentice" everything about F2000 is different. It still keeps the idea of Fantasia, but yet it has different segments and different music choices. So Fantasia 200 is a sequel.

Aladdin from Agrabah · Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:19 pm

What I have to say about sequels is; MORE MORE MORE MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ARE YOU PEOPLE BLIND?????DON'T YOU GET IT? IF SEQUELS DIE, THEN THE 2-D ANIMATION IS DEAD FOR EVER!!!!!! DEAD DEAD DEAD!! D-E-A-D!!! IF YOU LIKE WATCHING MOVIES LIKE SHREK OR BARBIE RAPUNZEL FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE, THEN GO AHEAD!!!
Disney is not going to produce any other 2-d original motion pictures!!! The only hope for us 2-d animation lovers are-which is terrible, but still our last hope-the sequels!!!

If you ask me I'd like to see Ursula's beautiful daughter falling in love with Triton's missing only-son, and also the only heir to the throne of Atlantica. Ariel tries to protect her family from the new "threat", but then she realises that she was wrong, as the children are really in love.Which means ... THE LITTLE MERMAID 3: FOREVER UNDER THE SEA.
Oh, and for those who don't like this idea, remember what Thumper's father used to say; If you don't have anything good to say, don't say anything at all.

Disney-Fan · Post by **Disney-Fan** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:24 pm

Sorry to disappoint, but apparently Disney have decided to close Toon Studios anyway....

TashieGirl · Post by **TashieGirl** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:42 pm

Personally, I don't mind if they make sequals to post-wait era such as The Aristocrats, Robin Hood, and so on but when they make sequals to Walt's own flims, that where I draw the line. I intend to ignore sequlas like the rest of the public. For example, everyone remembers The Jungle Book as one of Walt's greatest flims but do they remember The Jungle Book 2? What about Cinderella 2? Peter Pan 2? 101 Dalmations 2? I don't think so. Trust me, you can't get rid of Disney sequals forever by yelling "STOP MAKING SEQUALS. THEY RUIN THE CLASSICS". Just ignore them. It really works.

Enchantress · Post by **Enchantress** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:10 pm

Aladdin from Agrabah wrote:What I have to say about sequels is; MORE MORE MORE MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ARE YOU PEOPLE BLIND?????DON'T YOU GET IT? IF SEQUELS DIE, THEN THE 2-D ANIMATION IS DEAD FOR EVER!!!!!! DEAD DEAD DEAD!! D-E-A-D!!! IF YOU LIKE WATCHING MOVIES LIKE SHREK OR BARBIE RAPUNZEL FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE, THEN GO AHEAD!!!

As much as i love 2D animation, compared to 3D. iId rather see a well made CGI movie than a cheap and shoddy 2D sequel anyday.

Anyway, i agree with what Tim Burton said in an interview on rotten tomatoes.com, he said 'no kind of animation ever dies, it will come back one day, and people will be interested in it again' (or along those lines anyway

)
So i'll just have to wait for that day to come.

I don't want annoy you Aladdin from Agrabah, and i don't want it to seem that way, if you like sequels, cool. but personally i don't, it's just a matter of opinion

.

Escapay · Post by **Escapay** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:22 pm

Aladdin from Agrabah wrote:What I have to say about sequels is; MORE MORE MORE MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ARE YOU PEOPLE BLIND?????DON'T YOU GET IT? IF SEQUELS DIE, THEN THE 2-D ANIMATION IS DEAD FOR EVER!!!!!! DEAD DEAD DEAD!! D-E-A-D!!! IF YOU LIKE WATCHING MOVIES LIKE SHREK OR BARBIE RAPUNZEL FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE, THEN GO AHEAD!!!
Disney is not going to produce any other 2-d original motion pictures!!! The only hope for us 2-d animation lovers are-which is terrible, but still our last hope-the sequels!!!

Whoa...

I highly recommend decaf.

Anyways, sequels from 1994-2004 have so far been pretty forgettable and detracts from the original. But some people enjoy them and I can't stop them from watching them just because I personally don't like them.

I wouldn't mind sequels for movies where a sequel is possible. Alice in Wonderland, Sleeping Beauty, The Black Cauldron, The Great Mouse Detective for example.

AiW is derived from two books, so there are many more stories to be told. Perhaps Disney's Feature Animation department could do a continuation of Alice. Not a sequel, not a remake. Just other Alice stories. It doesn't have to be related to the 1951 original. Like how the miniseries Scarlett isn't necessarily related to Gone With the Wind. It's a continuation of the story, but no one ever said it had to be canon to the 1939 movie. A second Alice movie would be a continuation of the stories, but not necessarily related to the 1951 feature.

As for Sleeping Beauty, the story is quite grim (as I posted earlier). But it is a continuing story that is ripe for telling on a less...scary tale.

The Black Cauldron could do well as a live-action feature series by Disney or perhaps if they started from scratch and did the first of the 3 books of the Chronicles of Prydain.

The Great Mouse Detective screams sequel at the end. 'nuff said.

Escapay

DVDizzy Forum

Latest Movie Reviews

🎬 DVDizzy Top Stories️️

What sequels would you like to see?