What Movie Did You Just Watch? (Now Enhanced with FastPlay!)

Any topic that doesn't fit elsewhere.
User avatar
Karushifa
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:49 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Post by Karushifa »

AwallaceUNC wrote:I'm happy to see that you've watched it, Loomis (and apparently, I must note, on Easter). I think you've made a fair and reasonable analysis of the movie, even if I don't agree entirely. The violence is certainly abundant, but for Christians, I think justified. Christians I know often talk about their difficulty grasping the events of the Bible. It's not that they doubt that they really happened, but rather that they have difficulty comprehending it as real life rather than a story, because that's how it's been presented to many for their whole lives. So when a movie like <i>The Passion</i> comes along, it aids in making that connection. That said, if it were anyone but Jesus, I would agree that it's entirely too violent (but also wonder if it would have been criticized as much for its violence by the media). I, too, find it very difficult to return to and have actually never watched it a second time, precisely because of how simultaneously moving and draining the experience was. So I can see where it would certainly seem that way to non-believers or someone less familiar with Jesus' life. That's where the context of His life comes, which as you point out, is represented in a few poignant scenes but isn't a focus of the narrative by any means. I agree that more context would of course be helpful, but given that I've already said that the violence has its place, the movie was already long enough as it is. I've heard that Gibson plans on making movies with similar artisic sensibilities about Jesus' birth, life, teachings, etc., and perhaps even His return. (Anyone have any more info on those plans or if they are true?). If so, maybe we'll one day have Mel Gibson's <i>Passion</i>s: The Holy Trilogy and the film will be largely viewed inside a more balanced and perhaps even epic narrative. In the meantime, there's always the Bible, as Hollywood unfortunately hasn't produced a large number of movies that are both (a)well-made and (b)accepted by most Christians as representative of what they actually believe (most seem to fall into only one of these categories, a key reason to <i>The Passion</i>'s success, I think), making that context for His death that we both agree is very important to understanding and valuing the events depicted in <i>The Passion</i> less accessible.
I just thought I'd poke my head in this one as I happen to be Jewish and thus was supposed to be "offended" (!) according to some pundits, by this movie. I know there are a whole lot of Christians on this board, so I thought an outside perspective might be nice.

Aaron, your points are well taken regarding the gravity of this particular chapter of Jesus' life for Christians. When I saw this film, it seemed to me like it was made for Christians especially, who already know of other events in Jesus' life and perhaps don't need as much of a reminder of them for the story to still be affecting. I can say that this lack of context did bother me, however, not being totally Bible-literate and a rather objective observer (I did like the scene of the last supper confirming that it was a seder, though...the "bread" symbolizing the body appeared to be matzah, as far as I could tell). So in that sense I did want more justification for truly feeling something for this person being so brutally tortured, other than obviously not wanting to see ANYone go through that.

There were some things about the movie that I liked, but overall I would say that as a stand-alone film, I didn't take much away that I didn't already know as, let's say, a casual acquaintance of Jesus rather than a close, personal friend. Perhaps further films the the same vein would help. I will say that it wasn't as virulently anti-Semitic as some had been claiming...I mean, the ancient Hebrews don't come off particularly well, but pretty much anyone is capable of mob mentality. I didn't really see it as a Birth of a Nation-scale treatment or anything like that.

I didn't want to foster another huge argument, either, but from the looks of it such would be better than the knock-down, drag-out fight about The Passion that I had with someone on another board where the person was belittling me the whole way :roll: It's nice to see some people getting along relatively well here.
Oh, I'm sorry, you're all standing...here, let me make you a chair!

Karushifa's Random Top 5 of the Week: US National Parks/Sites:
1) Yosemite N.P.
2) Caribbean Nat'l Forest (Puerto Rico)
3) Death Valley N.P.
4) Cape Lookout Nat'l Seashore
5) Sequoia N.P.
Zoltack
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2528
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:15 pm

Post by Zoltack »

Lord of the Rings: Two Towers

Not as good as Return of the King mainly because ROTK is where it all adds up and all the pieces are put together. Better than Fellowship of the Ring because in TT the plot basically thickens and FOTR is just getting us started.

Then I watched Die Hard: With a Vengeance possibly the best Die Hard movie because of all the good actors in it.
Image
User avatar
Karushifa
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:49 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Post by Karushifa »

Zoltack wrote:Lord of the Rings: Two Towers

Not as good as Return of the King mainly because ROTK is where it all adds up and all the pieces are put together. Better than Fellowship of the Ring because in TT the plot basically thickens and FOTR is just getting us started.
Have you seen the extended cut of The Two Towers? There's a bit more exposition on some of the "outlier" characters, especially regarding the Ents and the relationship between Boromir, Faramir, and their wacky ol' dad Denethor (Boromir = Fortunate Son, Faramir = ....uhhh, who are you, again?). I suppose some of this stuff was cut to show more Helm's Deep action, but I thought it added more to the film than the zillionth time you see an orc/elf/man get hacked asunder.
Oh, I'm sorry, you're all standing...here, let me make you a chair!

Karushifa's Random Top 5 of the Week: US National Parks/Sites:
1) Yosemite N.P.
2) Caribbean Nat'l Forest (Puerto Rico)
3) Death Valley N.P.
4) Cape Lookout Nat'l Seashore
5) Sequoia N.P.
Zoltack
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2528
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:15 pm

Post by Zoltack »

No we don't have any of the EXE DVD's because my mom wanted to get them early and she's not as much of a movie nut as I am. I should probably get the EXE DVD's but I need money. ;)
Image
User avatar
Karushifa
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:49 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Post by Karushifa »

Zoltack wrote:No we don't have any of the EXE DVD's because my mom wanted to get them early and she's not as much of a movie nut as I am. I should probably get the EXE DVD's but I need money. ;)
Yeah, those EEs are pretty heavy on movie-buff material...production stills, making-of docus, even interactive maps of Middle Earth, not to mention meatier versions of the films (Return of the King EE clocks in at something like 4 hours 30 minutes). For the casual fan, such over-abundance of extras would indeed be staggering.

Over at www.deepdiscountdvd.com, they have the uber-sets with the EE DVD set PLUS the miniature (varies depending on which movie you get...ROTK has a very cool Minas Tirith box) for $22.49. These are the same sets that places like FYE are still selling for $50 or more. So, if you can free up about $20 a pop, I definitely think they would make good investments :D
Oh, I'm sorry, you're all standing...here, let me make you a chair!

Karushifa's Random Top 5 of the Week: US National Parks/Sites:
1) Yosemite N.P.
2) Caribbean Nat'l Forest (Puerto Rico)
3) Death Valley N.P.
4) Cape Lookout Nat'l Seashore
5) Sequoia N.P.
brownie
Special Edition
Posts: 773
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:34 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Post by brownie »

This weekend I watched The United States of Leland, Matilda, Mulholland Drive, The Flintstones, and Walk the Line (<3!!!).
Timon/Pumbaa fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3675
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by Timon/Pumbaa fan »

The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King: Well I actually didn't see all of it, but since there is enough material in that "movie" for 20 different movies, I consider it a 2nd viewing. :wink: :D

Overall, bad movie. The worst of the trilogy imo. There like 20 scenes that didn't belong. Why did that hobbit sing for that guy? Why did Frollo leave at the end. Speaking of the end, it ended a freakin 20 times!

I don't understand how it won 11 oscars. Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark and E.T. along with many other were a SO much better than this snooze fest. By the way how did it get an oscar for editing! THEY DIDN'T DO ANY!!!

But then again, the academy hasn't given out the "Best Picture" to the best movie in a long time, which almost everyone agrees, except Prince Eric.

Overall since I'm generous, I'll give it 5/10! Worst of the trilogy by far.

Well at least it's better than King Krap, err, King Kong (directed by, the same director lol)
Last edited by Timon/Pumbaa fan on Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Karushifa
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:49 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Post by Karushifa »

Timon/Pumba fan wrote:Overall, bad movie. The worst of the trilogy imo. There like 20 scenes that didn't belong. Why did that hobbit sing for that guy? Why did Frollo leave at the end. Speaking of the end, it ended a freakin 20 times!

I don't understand how it won 11 oscars. Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark and E.T. along with many other were a SO much better than this snooze fest. By the way how did it get an oscar for editing! THEY DIDN'T DO ANY!!!

But then again, the academy hasn't given out the "Best Picture" to the best movie in a long time, which almost everyone agrees, except Prince Eric.

Overall since I'm generous, I'll give it 5/10! Worst of the trilogy by far.

Well at least it's better than King Krap(directed by, the same director lol)
Hmmm...I'm guessing you haven't read the books, because if they had included everything in them, the movies would have been about 6 or 7 hours long apiece...

If you were watching it just for the action scenes then, yeah, it can come across as really boring. But if you pay attention, there is a reason behind everything that happens. For example, Pippin ("that hobbit"), as shown in the extended cut of the film, builds up a rapport with Faramir, the guy who rides out on basically a suicide mission just to please his insane dad Denethor. When Pippin is ordered to sing for Denethor, who doesn't even seem to be showing any concern that his last son may be riding off to die, he is really singing a song of mourning for the doomed riders, which is why he, you know, cries when he's done. It sorta signifies the weakness and frailty of the World of Men and all that crap.

As for Frodo, he leaves at the end because - and again, you have to pay attention with this one - various characters keep dropping hints through the whole trilogy that "the quest will claim his life". So, okay, you're thinking, well that means that Frodo is gonna die. But what actually happens is that the burden of the ring, which almost drives him mad with lust for power, fundamentally changes who he is, and he eventually realizes that he can't carry on a normal life as he once did. Thus he gets on the boat with his uncle to go to a place where he can start anew.

It's all so complicated, I know, but unless you have read the books, the LOTR movies aren't going to immediately make sense on the first viewing. But I found that the more I watched all three films, the more I really liked them, since I realized something new every time that I didn't see before.
Oh, I'm sorry, you're all standing...here, let me make you a chair!

Karushifa's Random Top 5 of the Week: US National Parks/Sites:
1) Yosemite N.P.
2) Caribbean Nat'l Forest (Puerto Rico)
3) Death Valley N.P.
4) Cape Lookout Nat'l Seashore
5) Sequoia N.P.
User avatar
The Little Merman
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1849
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 8:07 am

Post by The Little Merman »

Boys Don't Cry

An absolutley enthralling film. Startlingly emotional - Hilary Swank gives one of the best female performances I've ever witnessed.

Superb in every sense of the word.

*tlm
User avatar
Loomis
Signature Collection
Posts: 6357
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia ... where there is no Magic Kingdom :(
Contact:

Post by Loomis »

All the President's Men (1976)

Taut drama, makes me want to be an investigative reporter. Remember the days when people used to investigate the news, rather than simply report it? So relevant today, when there is so much suspicion about government activity, so few facts available and many many non-denial denials. Excellent. A+
Behind the Panels - Comic book news, reviews and podcast
The Reel Bits - All things film
Twitter - Follow me on Twitter
memnv
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2699
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:14 pm
Location: Carson City
Contact:

Post by memnv »

Watched Bad Santa
Dark Knight Rulez
User avatar
Robin Hood
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1825
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Robin Hood »

Went to see Scary Movie 4 on opening day.
- Jonathan
Timon/Pumbaa fan
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3675
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by Timon/Pumbaa fan »

Karushifa wrote: Hmmm...I'm guessing you haven't read the books, because if they had included everything in them, the movies would have been about 6 or 7 hours long apiece...

If you were watching it just for the action scenes then, yeah, it can come across as really boring. But if you pay attention, there is a reason behind everything that happens. For example, Pippin ("that hobbit"), as shown in the extended cut of the film, builds up a rapport with Faramir, the guy who rides out on basically a suicide mission just to please his insane dad Denethor. When Pippin is ordered to sing for Denethor, who doesn't even seem to be showing any concern that his last son may be riding off to die, he is really singing a song of mourning for the doomed riders, which is why he, you know, cries when he's done. It sorta signifies the weakness and frailty of the World of Men and all that crap.

As for Frodo, he leaves at the end because - and again, you have to pay attention with this one - various characters keep dropping hints through the whole trilogy that "the quest will claim his life". So, okay, you're thinking, well that means that Frodo is gonna die. But what actually happens is that the burden of the ring, which almost drives him mad with lust for power, fundamentally changes who he is, and he eventually realizes that he can't carry on a normal life as he once did. Thus he gets on the boat with his uncle to go to a place where he can start anew.

It's all so complicated, I know, but unless you have read the books, the LOTR movies aren't going to immediately make sense on the first viewing. But I found that the more I watched all three films, the more I really liked them, since I realized something new every time that I didn't see before.
No, I haven't read the books, just watched the movies. :P

Anyway, thanks for those explinations. I just don't see the hype for the film. I mean, I think ROTK should've at least explained stuff so non-readers would understand. In fact, that's also a problem I have with the last two Harry Potter films.

Anyway, I do like the first two installments, but why couldn't they make ROTK AT LEAST 30 minutes shorter? Way too long!

Anyway, today I saw Home on the Range: I even liked it more than the first time.

I'm a little confused why people say it only has crude jokes. Yes, it has them, but there is much more than that.

Good Alan Menkan music, beautiful animation and a lot of great voice actors(except Roseanne :P).

Overall: 7/10
User avatar
Karushifa
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:49 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Post by Karushifa »

Timon/Pumba fan wrote:No, I haven't read the books, just watched the movies. :P

Anyway, thanks for those explinations. I just don't see the hype for the film. I mean, I think ROTK should've at least explained stuff the non-readers wouldn't understand. In fact, that's also a problem I have with the last two Harry Potter films.

Anyway, I do like the first two installments, but why couldn't they make ROTK AT LEAST 30-20 minutes shorter?
Incdidentally, I haven't read the books either. I've skimmed through the "cliff notes" appendices at the end of Return of the King which includes a handy timeline of most of what happens in the trilogy, but when I actually tried to read the text, I found it to be extremely dense. Maybe I'll really sit down and read it some day, but after having been forced to read countless mediocre, wordy books in high school, I'm loathe to willingly read a huge work of fiction . Give it time.

If you listen in on the uber-nerd community out there, a lot of them complain with a passion that the movies were actually dumbed down somewhat. But a good number of them do fault P.J. for the 40-minute ending to ROTK, and some say that the movie should have ended at the coronation, perhaps with the fly-over of the map of Middle Earth fading into the credits. Unfortunately, Jackson's editing eye didn't get any keener with King Kong, which unlike ROTK was stretched to over 3 hours with red herring instead of actual plot.
Oh, I'm sorry, you're all standing...here, let me make you a chair!

Karushifa's Random Top 5 of the Week: US National Parks/Sites:
1) Yosemite N.P.
2) Caribbean Nat'l Forest (Puerto Rico)
3) Death Valley N.P.
4) Cape Lookout Nat'l Seashore
5) Sequoia N.P.
memnv
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2699
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:14 pm
Location: Carson City
Contact:

Post by memnv »

Just watched Clash of the Titans and Dukes of Hazzard - Unrated
Dark Knight Rulez
User avatar
Karushifa
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:49 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Post by Karushifa »

I watched X2: X-Men United on FX last night. I must say, they've done a really good job with these X-Men movies thus far, probably the best of all the recent comic book movies IMO. I mean, for starters, you've got a villain who manages to subdue both Magneto AND Professor X, and it's really anyone's guess as to how he's going to be defeated with that sort of power (not to mention that villainess with the adamantium nails...). Plus, you've got Nightcrawler (BAMF!) who can teleport AND has a tail. And, really, how can you go wrong with a movie that has Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart, and Ian McKellen? It more than makes up for Academy Award Winner (TM) Halle Berry's non-acting :D
Oh, I'm sorry, you're all standing...here, let me make you a chair!

Karushifa's Random Top 5 of the Week: US National Parks/Sites:
1) Yosemite N.P.
2) Caribbean Nat'l Forest (Puerto Rico)
3) Death Valley N.P.
4) Cape Lookout Nat'l Seashore
5) Sequoia N.P.
NarniaDis
Special Edition
Posts: 596
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 3:09 pm
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

Post by NarniaDis »

So far this week I have watched...

NARNIA!!!
Pirates of the C.
Chicken Little
Spiderman
Yours, Mine & Ours (2005)
Leage of Extraordinary Gentlemen

Tomorrow...
Spiderman 2
The Pacifier

I have a friend down visiting for the week, and I have a bunch He hasn't seen :lol:
Im a riding on cloud Nine.
memnv
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2699
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:14 pm
Location: Carson City
Contact:

Post by memnv »

Watched True Lies
Dark Knight Rulez
Lazario

Post by Lazario »

Demons
Cat O' Nine Tails (again)
User avatar
The Little Merman
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1849
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 8:07 am

Post by The Little Merman »

Just yesterday I watched L.A. Confidential.

*tlm
Locked